Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Y Chromosomes Sketch New Outline of British History
NY Times ^ | May 27, 2003 | NICHOLAS WADE

Posted on 05/27/2003 3:49:55 PM PDT by Pharmboy

History books favor stories of conquest, not of continuity, so it is perhaps not surprising that many Englishmen grow up believing they are a fighting mixture of the Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Vikings and Normans who invaded Britain. The defeated Celts, by this reckoning, left their legacy only in the hinterlands of Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

A new genetic survey of Y chromosomes throughout the British Isles has revealed a very different story. The Celtic inhabitants of Britain were real survivors. Nowhere were they entirely replaced by the invaders and they survive in high proportions, often 50 percent or more, throughout the British Isles, according to a study by Dr. Cristian Capelli, Dr. David B. Goldstein and others at University College London.

The study, being reported today in Current Biology, was based on comparing Y chromosomes sampled throughout the British Isles with the invaders' Y chromosomes, as represented by the present-day descendants of the Danes, Vikings (in Norway) and Anglo-Saxons (in Schleswig-Holstein in northern Germany).

The survey began as a request from the British Broadcasting Corporation to look for genetic signatures of the Vikings in England, later broadened to include the Danes and Anglo-Saxons. Dr. Goldstein said that not enough money was available to study two other invaders, the Romans and the Normans, but that he felt that their demographic contribution had probably been small.

He assumed the original inhabitants of Britain could be represented by men living in Castlerea, in central Ireland, a region not reached by any foreign invader. In a study two years ago Dr. Goldstein and colleagues established that Y chromosomes of Celtic populations were almost identical with those of the Basques.

The Basques live in a mountainous refuge on the French-Spanish border and speak a language wholly unrelated to the Indo-European tongues that swept into Europe some 8,000 years ago, bringing the agricultural revolution of the Neolithic period. Hence they have long been regarded as likely remnants of the first modern humans to reach Europe some 30,000 years ago, during the Paleolithic.

By this chain of reasoning, the Celtic-speaking men, since genetically very close to the Basques, must also be drawn from the original Paleolithic inhabitants of Europe, and probably represent the first modern human inhabitants of Britain who settled the islands some 10,000 years ago, Dr. Goldstein said. These original Britons must later have adopted from Europe both the Celtic culture, evidence of which appears from some 3,000 years ago, and the Celtic language, which is a branch of the Indo-European language family.

Having identified Y chromosomes assumed typical of the original Britons, Dr. Goldstein and his team could assess the demographic impact of the invaders. They found that the Vikings left a heavy genetic imprint in the Orkneys, the islands off the northeast coast of Scotland, which were a center of Viking operations between A.D. 800 and 1200. Many men in York and east England carry Danish Y chromosomes. But surprisingly, there is little sign of Anglo-Saxon heritage in southern England.

"One tends to think of England as Anglo-Saxon," Dr. Goldstein said. "But we show quite clearly there was not complete replacement of existing populations by either Anglo-Saxons or Danes. It looks like the Celts did hold out."

The Y chromosome measures only the activities of men. In a survey reported two years ago, Dr. Goldstein and colleagues examined British mitochondrial DNA, a genetic element inherited through the mother. Surprisingly, the British maternal heritage turned out to be more like that of northern Europeans than British Y chromosomes are.

To explain that finding, it is not necessary to assume Britain was invaded by an army of Amazons, Dr. Goldstein said, or that the Celts had suddenly decided to replace their Celtic wives with women from the Middle East. More probably, since Celts in Britain remained in contact with those in Europe, there were continual exchanges that included women. As in many cultures, the Celtic men stayed put while women moved to their husbands' villages.

So over time, Britain's female population would gradually have become more like that of Northern Europe, Dr. Goldstein suggested.

British historians have generally emphasized the Roman and Anglo-Saxon contributions to English culture at the expense of the Celtic. A recent history of Britain, "The Isles" by Norman Davies, tried to redress the balance. The Celts were ignored, he noted, in part because no documentary histories remain, the Celts having regarded writing as a threat to their oral traditions. Generations of historians saw British history as beginning with Roman invasions of the first century A.D. and indeed identified with the Romans rather than the defeated Celts.

"So long as classical education and classical prejudices prevailed, educated Englishmen inevitably saw ancient Britain as an alien land," Dr. Davies writes. The new survey indicates that the genetic contribution of the Celts has been as much underestimated as their historical legacy.

Dr. Davies said in an interview that "traditionally, historians thought in terms of invasions: the Celts took over the islands, then the Romans, then the Anglo-Saxons."

"It now seems much more likely that the resident population doesn't change as much as thought," he continued. "The people stay put but are reculturalized by some new dominant culture."

The Y chromosome is a useful way of tracking men because it is passed unchanged from father to son, escaping the genetic shuffle between generations that affects the rest of the genome. Also, all men carry the same Y chromosome, a surprising situation derived from the fact that in the ancestral human population some men had no children or only daughters, so that in each generation some Y chromosomes disappeared until only one was left.

This one and only Y has the same sequence of DNA units in every man alive except for the occasional mutation that has cropped up every thousand years so and is then inherited by all that individuals' descendants. Geneticists can draw up family trees based on these mutations as branching points and then assign specific lineages to historic events or locations, like the entry of Neolithic farmers into Europe.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Unclassified; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: archaeology; basques; britain; celts; cymraeg; cymru; cymry; dna; europeanhistory; genetics; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; history; invasions; turass; unitedkingdom; wales; welsh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Some mighty interesting stuff in here...if you're interested in this sort of thing. I am and I know soem other Freepers are too.
1 posted on 05/27/2003 3:49:55 PM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam; aculeus; jennyp; PatrickHenry; thefactor
*Anthropology Ping* (and tell all your Celtic friends...)
2 posted on 05/27/2003 3:54:45 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Yes, it's an interesting article. And not all that surprising, really. The majority of the population at most times consisted of peasants and serfs, and there's no reason to think they would have all been killed or ousted when new conquerors moved in.

Some French historians of the annales school have pointed out that there's more continuity over the centuries when you look at peasants' huts and villages than there is in manors and castles, because invaders usually go after the manors and castles. The fighting takes place mainly within the fighting classes, which are the nobility and gentry. Peasants get killed, but there's no particular incentive to wipe them out as there would be with competing nobility.
3 posted on 05/27/2003 3:57:32 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Genetic SPOTREP
4 posted on 05/27/2003 4:02:56 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Wonderful!! More, please sir, more.
5 posted on 05/27/2003 4:04:40 PM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The Celtic inhabitants of Britain were real survivors. Nowhere were they entirely replaced by the invaders and they survive in high proportions, often 50 percent or more, throughout the British Isles ...

Well of course they do.

Just Remember Andy Capp

He was never politically correct, but he sure was realistic.

So9

6 posted on 05/27/2003 4:06:57 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
majority of the population at most times consisted of peasants and serfs, and there's no reason to think they would have all been killed

The 'serf' survival strategy is still with us today in the form of bureaucracies. The key to success is to never stand out amongst the rest ie the even hedge theory. Only the top level players win or lose.

7 posted on 05/27/2003 4:07:29 PM PDT by Snerfling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
Or better here

Andy Capp

So9

8 posted on 05/27/2003 4:09:28 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Good article , thanks.

" In a study two years ago Dr. Goldstein and colleagues established that Y chromosomes of Celtic populations were almost identical with those of the Basques.

Is anyone suprised?

My favorite theory is that most Europeans are descendents of the refugees from the flood of the Black Sea (Noah's Flood?) in 5,600BC.
Linguists have traced the origins of all the Indo-European languages to that region. (Traced mainly through words used by farmers)

However, Cheddar Man does not fit into that scheme.

9 posted on 05/27/2003 4:21:15 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Ancestry Of Europeans Traced To Middle East
10 posted on 05/27/2003 4:25:32 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Looks to me like those Celtic men had the last laugh. It also looks like they had an (understandable) hankering for those Scandanavian babes.
11 posted on 05/27/2003 4:26:04 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Vote Democrat! Vote for national--and personal--suicide! It's like being a suicide bomber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Archaeologists Find Celts In Unlikely Spot: Central Turkey
12 posted on 05/27/2003 4:28:11 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Highly interesting and informative article. Please post more here, when you can.

I'd love to get my Y chromosomes tested.
13 posted on 05/27/2003 4:29:05 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Unions and Marxists say, " Workers of the world unite!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Pharmboy
Unearthed: The Prince Of Stonehenge
15 posted on 05/27/2003 4:33:55 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA; Jim Robinson
I'd love to get my Y chromosomes tested.

That might not be a bad business to start: "Get to know your origins, men! Give us a bit of your inside cheek (the scraping won't hurt a bit) and we'll tell you what's in your background! Perhaps a bit of a Dutchman or a Swede, an Italian or a Mede! A Slav, or a Jew, a Moor or Bantu!

I'm just being silly, but maybe we can start an internet Freeper business doing this--whatcha think, Jim?

16 posted on 05/27/2003 4:40:42 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
And you do know, of course, that the Romans never fought in Ireland 'cause they feared those crazy Celts! ('Tis true!)
17 posted on 05/27/2003 4:42:18 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
And you do know, of course, that the Romans never fought in Ireland 'cause they feared those crazy Celts! ('Tis true!)

Well, it makes a good story. If the Romans had not had internal trouble they would have conquered the Picts and the Irish wouldn't have been far behind..

So9

18 posted on 05/27/2003 4:46:27 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
Another good story goes down for the truth (you sound like you know more about this than I do, mate).
19 posted on 05/27/2003 5:11:50 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Brit bump!
20 posted on 05/27/2003 5:13:36 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson