To: uvular; runningbear
"Why, for instance, would a transcriber or anyone else who may have had contact with this amendment to the autopsy, conclude as Dan did, that it could possibly be a noose and make it sound like someone had purposely strangled and stabbed Connor?
This really strikes me odd. Why in the world would this information have been an AMENDMENT?
It would seem to me this would have been one of the first things put in an autopsy report.
posted on 05/30/2003 7:35:46 AM PDT
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
Why in the world would this information have been an AMENDMENT?
The Geragos Road Map.
I'm not clear what the deal is with this amendment, either. Per Geraldo, it is 10 pages long, with text, chart, and an appendix-and I believe he also said included pics (according to my notes that I wrote down yesterday!) Wasn't the initial autopsy report just one page?
At any rate, Geraldo also said the amendment part was just given to attorneys on Monday. The lateness of receiving it, was due to some 'error'; attorneys should have gotten it sooner than Monday apparantly.
posted on 05/30/2003 8:29:01 AM PDT
I think that is a typo word...addendum
posted on 05/30/2003 11:15:51 AM PDT
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson