Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Books Every Student Should Read in College
HUMAN EVENTS ^ | Week of June 2, 2003 | 28 distinguished scholars and university professors

Posted on 05/30/2003 11:45:30 AM PDT by Remedy

The editors of HUMAN EVENTS asked a panel of 28 distinguished scholars and university professors to serve as judges in developing a list of Ten Books Every Student Should Read in College.

To derive the list, each scholar first nominated titles. When all the nominations were collected-they amounted to more than 100 titles-HUMAN EVENTS then sent a ballot to the scholars asking each to list his or her Top Ten selections. A book was awarded ten points for receiving a No. 1 rating, 9 points for receiving a No. 2 rating, and so on. The ten books with the highest aggregate ratings made the list. We have also compiled an Honorable Mention list.

Interestingly enough, the No. 1 book our judges decided every college student should read is a volume that has been virtually banned in public schools by the United States Supreme Court.

1. The Bible

Score: 116
Written: c. 1446 B.C. to c. A.D. 95

The Bible, the central work of Western Civilization, defines the relationship between God and man, and forms the foundation of faith in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Yet, today it is virtually banned in America's public primary and secondary schools-meaning many American students may not encounter the most important book of all time in a classroom setting until they reach college.

2. The Federalist Papers

Score: 106
Authors: Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison
Written: October 1787 to May 1788

Written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, The Federalist Papers first appeared in several New York state newspapers as a series of 85 essays published under the nom de plume "Publius" from the fall of 1787 to the spring of 1788.

The purpose of The Federalist Papers was to garner support for the newly created Constitution. At the time the states were bound together under the Articles of Confederation, but the weakness of the Articles necessitated the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Once the Constitution was drafted, nine states were required to ratify it, so Hamilton, Jay, and Madison took up the effort to persuade skeptics. Because Hamilton and Madison were both members of the Constitutional Convention, their writings are instructive in divining the original intent of those who drafted the Constitution.

According to the Library of Congress, the first bound edition of The Federalist Papers was published in 1788 with revisions and corrections by Hamilton. A bound edition with revisions and corrections by Madison published in 1818 was the first to identify the authors of each essay.

3. Democracy in America

Score: 80
Author: Alexis de Tocqueville
Written: 1835

A left-leaning Frenchman who visited America in 1831, de Tocqueville produced an incisive portrait of American political and social life in the early 19th Century. He praised the democratic ideals and private virtues of the American people but warned against what he saw as the tyrannical tendency of public opinion. Visiting during the heyday of slavery, de Tocqueville foresaw the troubles racial questions would pose for the country. He also was early in observing that judicial power had a tendency to usurp the political in the United States. He also wrote of the difficulties inherent in the egalitarian sentiment then gaining strength in America. "However energetically society in general may strive to make all the citizens equal and alike, the personal pride of each individual will always make him try to escape from the common level, and he will form some inequality somewhere to his own profit," he said.

4. The Divine Comedy

Score: 57
Author: Dante Alighieri
Written: A.D. 1306-1321

One of the most frequently cited poems of all time, this epic allegory is an amalgam of Dante's views of science, theology, astronomy, and philosophy. In it Dante recounts his imaginary journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Paradise, during which he realizes his hatred for his sin and becomes a changed man by the grace of God.

The work contains three sections-"Inferno," "Purgatorio," and "Paradiso." In "Inferno," Dante journeys through Hell, led by the soul of the Roman poet Virgil. He describes Hell as a funnel-shaped pit divided into nine circles, each one a place for those people guilty of a particular sin, with suffering increasing as he descends to the bottom where Satan himself dwells.

In "Purgatorio," Dante travels with Virgil up the Mount of Purgatory. Ten terraces make up the Mount and the process of purification for its occupants is arduous as they climb from terrace to terrace. When Dante and Virgil pass the final terrace, they glimpse Paradise where Beatrice, Dante's first love, awaits and Virgil is forced to depart.

In "Paradiso," Beatrice guides Dante through the various levels of Paradise. At the highest level, Empyrean, where God, Mary, and many of the angels and saints abide, Dante views the light of God, which leaves him speechless and changed.

5. The Republic

Score: 55
Author: Plato
Written: c. 360 B.C.

The Republic is likely the most important work of the most important and influential philosopher who ever lived. The writings of Plato, a disciple of Socrates in ancient Athens, provide the foundation of abstract thought for all of Western Civilization, and The Republic contains expositions of various theories of justice, the state and society, and the soul. Is justice a matter of being helpful to those who help you and harmful to those who harm you? Or is it simply the "interest of the stronger," defined by those who govern the rest of us, as post-modern leftists would have it? How should society be organized? How is the human soul structured? How may we arrive at truth? The first author in history to deal with such questions in systematic rational argument, Plato contrasts the ideal society with reality in a way later echoed in the City of God (No. 7) by St. Augustine-who explored his own soul in his Confessions (No. 9). Plato describes the first totalitarian utopia as part of his argument, the first of many thinkers to do so. Ralph Waldo Emerson said, "Out of Plato come all things that are still written and debated among men of thought."

6. The Politics

Score: 54
Author: Aristotle
Written: Fourth Century, B.C.

Aristotle, the most famous student of Plato, is one of the few men who managed to be highly appreciated both in his own time (he was hired to tutor Alexander the Great) and by posterity. His philosophy continues to form the backbone of Western thought. Much of his writing was lost for centuries, but its recovery helped Thomas Aquinas, in the 13th Century, and later political philosophers, develop the concept of natural law that became central to the Anglo-American understanding of just and limited government. Both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson cited Aristotle as an inspiration for the Declaration of Independence.

In the Politics, Aristotle examines the formation and composition of civil society more simply and effectively than perhaps anyone since. Beginning with a complete accounting of the elements in the basic unit of society-the oikos or family home-the philosopher expands outward to discuss the larger unit of human existence, the city-state-or polis-in the same terms.

7. Nicomachaean Ethics

Score: 52
Author: Aristotle
Written: Fourth Century, B.C.

The Ethics is a collection of notes from Aristotle's lectures, taken by his student Nicomachus. The Ethics' elegant inductive arguments, developed hundreds of years before the Christian era, proved that man can indeed understand the basic concepts of good and evil without the aid of Divine Revelation-a fact that many leftists are unwilling to accept in their quest to destroy respect for objective rules of right and wrong.

Unlike today's secularists, Aristotle saw clearly that all human beings have a built-in need to pursue happiness through behaving properly. Aristotle analyzes why not all human actions lead to happiness, and reveals how a man's daily choices between good and evil result in the habits of virtue or vice. Virtuous action, he concludes, makes men happy, whereas vice does not.

7. City of God

Score: 52
Author: St. Augustine of Hippo
Written: A.D. 413-426

The City of God ranks as history's most influential writing by a theologian. Augustine, the cultured bishop of an ancient Roman city in North Africa, created a philosophy of history that answered the argument of pagans who blamed the decline of Rome on the rise of Christianity. (Rome had first been sacked in 410.) Augustine explained human history in terms of Divine Providence and asserted that the Church would bring human history to its final consummation. At that consummation, the two "cities" that remained intermingled on Earth-the pure, virtuous city of God and the sinful, flawed city of man-would be separated into two. Augustine argued that the sinful practices of the pagan Romans helped prompt God to allow the Eternal City's capture by barbarians. Augustine firmly implants teleology-the Aristotelian idea that all things have an ultimate purpose-into history just as previous Christian thinkers had adopted teleology to explain God's plan for individual human beings. For Augustine, all of human history points toward a divine purpose.

9. Confessions

Score: 47
Author: St. Augustine of Hippo
Written: c. A.D. 400

The Confessions is Augustine's spiritual autobiography. Addressed to God, the book bares the author's soul. Here Augustine explains the history of his life in terms of Divine Providence, much as in the City of God he explained the history of Rome. He owns up to the sins that pulled him away from faith despite the exertions of his intensely devout mother, St. Monica. In the course of describing both his exterior and interior life, Augustine reiterates the Christian philosophy of the human person expounded by St. Paul in his epistles. He describes the interplay among passion, will, and reason and attempts to explain why men do evil when they know better.

10. Reflections on the Revolution in France

Score: 44
Author: Edmund Burke
Written: 1790

An Irish-born British politician of the late 18th Century, who was popular in America because of his opposition to taxing the colonies, Burke holds a prominent place in the history of English-speaking conservatives. Indeed, in The Conservative Mind, Russell Kirk singled him out as the first modern conservative intellectual.

Burke's early and energetic disapproval of the French Revolution proved prophetic in light of the Reign of Terror that followed. A champion of the inherent wisdom of long-settled traditions, Burke argued that by violently ripping up their nation's institutions root and branch, the French had assured themselves years of chaos.

If changes had to be made in France, he argued, could not the tried-and-true be kept and only the bad discarded? "Is it, then, true," he asked, "that the French government was such as to be incapable or undeserving of reform, so that it was of absolute necessity that the whole fabric should be at once pulled down and the area cleared for the erection of a theoretic, experimental edifice in its place?"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: books; federalistpapers; highereducation; humanevents; readinglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-253 next last
To: justshutupandtakeit
Ayn Rand is to literature as WJC is to ethics.

And you, of course, are the supreme judge of everything.

I've read Atlas Shrugged probably six times by now. It's an incredibly great novel by a woman of remarkable perception. Just the idea of writing about an "Equalization of Opportunity Bill" and an "Anti-Dog-Eat-Dog Bill" in the 50's is amazing to me. The book is sufficiently complex that I notice something new each time I go back to it. Maybe it overwhelmed you?

ML/NJ

101 posted on 05/30/2003 1:04:22 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gavriloprincip
Federalists were generally those who had actually fought for
Independence. Their core was the officers who surrounded Washington and formed the Society of the Cincinnatti. It was precisely their experience with the miserable efforts of the states in providing for the Army which determined them to form a stronger government.

The only choice was to watch the Union dissolve or form a new government to perfect it. There was no real government for the nation when the constitution was being written and ratified. Chaotic political activity and economic collapse were the background it was written against.

Protection of private property and minority rights were the principle aims of the writers. Hardly radical "hippies." In fact, many historians consider the constitution part of the counter-Revolution. Federalists were certainly to the right of their opponents who regularly pushed the states to declare debts expunged and threatened property in a number of ways.
102 posted on 05/30/2003 1:04:35 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
"Then again, why go to college when you can buy these books on Amazon for $350? That's a savings of $55,650 off the MSRP..."

Eggsactly Batman!

My dear ole grandpappy was one smart cookie...

He had a saying: "If you want a degree, go to college... If you want an education, go to the library."

103 posted on 05/30/2003 1:04:55 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
If you don't know the difference between knowledge and bias, look em up. And if you think knowledge precludes bias, you need more help than a dictionary can give.

Anti-Federalist Papers

104 posted on 05/30/2003 1:08:56 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
A.S. was fine as a polemic but a terrible novel about as well written as Danielle Steel. Rand's characterizations are flat and predictable, never once do you believe they are real people. I have no argument with the point of the book but it is not significant enough to even consider on a list like this.

Look at the skill difference between Orwell and Rand. No comparison imo. And G.O. says it all in 1/3 the length.
105 posted on 05/30/2003 1:09:04 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Add Skinner's Walden II.

I haven't read that. Thanks for the tip.

106 posted on 05/30/2003 1:10:57 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Walden II is #3 with Brave New World #1 and and Nineteen Eighty-Four #2. Get the whole set.
107 posted on 05/30/2003 1:13:37 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
"(Yes, I'm an engineer!)"

Mmm Hmmm... we shall see!!!!

I have a project I want you to do!

1. I want it "Fast"

2. I want it "Cheap"

3. I want it "Right"

Your response please.

108 posted on 05/30/2003 1:13:52 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Pick any two.
109 posted on 05/30/2003 1:15:17 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
For good reason.

Shalom.
110 posted on 05/30/2003 1:15:30 PM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
True, but it was still better than the book.

Shalom.
111 posted on 05/30/2003 1:16:03 PM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
"Pick any two."

We have a Winner here!

112 posted on 05/30/2003 1:16:04 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
For sheer entertainment, there is Galileo ...
You bet. Siderius Nuncius should have received Honorable Mention for presaging philosophy's subjective turn and the scientific enlightenment.
113 posted on 05/30/2003 1:16:07 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
...Your gun as an honorable mention?

No. The tag line serves to let people know that I'm a vet, and to show my respect for the 2nd amendment. I get asked that question all the time.

5.56mm

114 posted on 05/30/2003 1:16:27 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
bump for file and reading later
115 posted on 05/30/2003 1:18:06 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (chuck <truth@YeshuaHaMashiach>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
These guys don't seem to be fans of any books written in the last two centuries, do they?

It really takes a minimum of a century or two in order to really be able to identify works that are going to be of lasting and significant importance. A better approach might have been to rank the top three-to-five works written prior to 1800 in each of a number of major disciplines.

116 posted on 05/30/2003 1:19:59 PM PDT by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
I would replace one of the Top Ten with "The Richest Man in Babylon."

Of course, Adam Smith's master work is a must read!

117 posted on 05/30/2003 1:20:37 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonghornFreeper
I agree with you, that it should be read, but only in conjunction with the letters and epistles of the Church Fathers, as an antidote to the errors of Luther.
118 posted on 05/30/2003 1:22:19 PM PDT by RomanCatholicProlifer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I have read all her novels of which I am aware. The best is Fountainhead and even it is not worthy of consideration on such a list. A.S. is a ham-handed polemic with one-dimensional characterizations. Compared with truly great writers' literature: Dickens, Doestoevski, Flaukner, even Steinbeck, Melville, Austin and dozens of others it looks amatuerish. Now compared to Stephen King, Danielle Steel, Erica Jong, Harold Robbins, Leon Uris, Zane Grey, or Loius L'Amour it is adequate.

You are wasting your time re-reading such a book when there are hundreds of more significant ones out there. Maybe thousands.
119 posted on 05/30/2003 1:22:22 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
"The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" - Edward Gibbon.
120 posted on 05/30/2003 1:22:28 PM PDT by Hack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Aristotle remains the premier philosopher of the Western world. I know it is simplistic, but maybe the difference between Christendom and Islam is that the West honored the Philosopher while Islam abandoned him.
121 posted on 05/30/2003 1:23:55 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Never said anything to indicate otherwise. Bias is generally opposed to knowledge however and prevents its acquisition.

And I certainly know the difference between the greatest leaders America ever produced: Washington, Hamilton, Adams, Madison, Marshall and their trivial opponents whose names will become more obscure as the ages and the glory of their antagonists progress.

Hamilton and Madison were so far above the antis it is laughable. The document they produced and implemented is the greatest political work ever conceived by man. Federalist is the greatest work of policical science in the last millenium at least, no, make it the last two millenia.
122 posted on 05/30/2003 1:30:41 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
I was very old before someone pointed out to me that one needs to read his metaphysics in conjunction with his logic. Much of the difficulties of his essentialism went away when I did this.
123 posted on 05/30/2003 1:30:46 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Better work in Aristotle, Locke and Hume, since they built on these philosophers.
124 posted on 05/30/2003 1:33:39 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

to show my respect for the 2nd amendment

The Emerson case had extensive research about 2nd amendment, that needs to be universally promulgated.

125 posted on 05/30/2003 1:35:16 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
...the hippies of the 1960s did understand something. They were right in fighting the plastic culture, and the church should have been fighting it too... More than this, they were right in the fact that the plastic culture - modern man, the mechanistic worldview in university textbooks and in practice, the total threat of the machine, the establishment technology, the bourgeois upper middle class - is poor in its sensitivity to nature... As a utopian group, the counterculture understands something very real, both as to the culture as a culture, but also as to the poverty of modern man's concept of nature and the way the machine is eating up nature on every side.

-Francis Schaeffer, Pollution And The Death of Man

126 posted on 05/30/2003 1:36:19 PM PDT by FoxPro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
gee, you forgot the most important.

<\sarcasm>

127 posted on 05/30/2003 1:39:05 PM PDT by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Aristotle remains the premier philosopher of the Western world.
I still think so, the blurb under The Republic notwithstanding ("The Republic is likely the most important work of the most important and influential philosopher who ever lived").
[M]aybe the difference between Christendom and Islam is that the West honored the Philosopher while Islam abandoned him.
LOL : ) Maybe, maybe ...
128 posted on 05/30/2003 1:39:14 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Yes, they did but Publius adapted them to their time and place and made those philosophies practical.
129 posted on 05/30/2003 1:39:28 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons
the list says "10 Books" not philosophers. Tolstoy is listed as a philosopher on some lists, though I don't think he belongs there.
130 posted on 05/30/2003 1:42:23 PM PDT by aardvark1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Anti-federalists were opposed to a nation and a federal government so they walked. They were irrelevent to history anyway and their leaving didn't matter maybe helped. They thought that would torpedo the CC but didn't count on Washington, Madison and Hamilton's genius.

Um, exsqueeze me? You only demonstrate that the anti-Federalist papers *should* be required reading, because you're hugely ignorant of how our nation was formed.

If it weren't for the anti-Federalists, we would not have a Bill of Rights. No Second Amendment, no First Amendment, no Tenth Amendment...

The Constitution would be a list of broad powers granted to the federal government, with no explicit "hands off" areas spelling out what government may *not* do with respect to the rights of individuals.

And in fact, many of the anti-federalist papers read like a litany of modern conservative essays about how the Constitution has failed or been subverted for lack of proper safeguards in the original language, such as:

Anti-federalist #11: UNRESTRICTED POWER OVER COMMERCE SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT (warnings about the expansion of federal power under the commerce clause)

Anti-federalist #12: HOW WILL THE NEW GOVERNMENT RAISE MONEY? (warnings about the inability of the fedgov to raise sufficient funds via impost taxes, foreshadowing the problem of spiraling income taxes and other kinds of taxes)

Anti-federalist #17: FEDERALIST POWER WILL ULTIMATELY SUBVERT STATE AUTHORITY (title speaks for itself)

Anti-federalist #23: CERTAIN POWERS NECESSARY FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE, CAN AND SHOULD BE LIMITED (more concerns about the loss of state control of local events, powers, and monies. Sample excerpt: "These powers taken in connection, amount to this: that the general government have unlimited authority and control over all the wealth and all the force of the union. The advocates for this scheme, would favor the world with a new discovery, if they would show, what kind of freedom or independency is left to the state governments, when they cannot command any part of the property or of the force of the country, but at the will ofthe Congress.")

Anti-federalist #26: THE USE OF COERCION BY THE NEW GOVERNMENT (foreshadowing the unrestrained abuses of the IRS. Excerpt: " The excise officers have power to enter your houses at all times, by night or day, and if you refuse them entrance, they can, under pretense of searching for exciseable goods, that the duty has not been paid on, break open your doors, chests, trunks, desks, boxes, and rummage your houses from bottom to top. ")

Anti-federalist #32: FEDERAL TAXATION AND THE DOCTRINE OF IMPLIED POWERS (warnings of the unrestricted ability of the fedgov to raise taxes without limit. Excerpt: "Second. We will next inquire into what is implied in the authority to pass all laws which shall be necessary and proper to carry this power into execution. It is, perhaps, utterly impossible fully to define this power. The authority granted in the first clause can only be understood in its full extent, by descending to all the particular cases in which a revenue can be raised; the number and variety of these cases are so endless, and as it were infinite, that no man living has, as yet, been able to reckon them up.")

Anti-federalist #46: WHERE THEN IS THE RESTRAINT? (powers of Congress defined too broadly. Excerpt: "Under such a clause as this, can anything be said to be reserved and kept back from Congress? Can it be said that the Congress have no power but what is expressed? "To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper" - or, in other words, to make all such laws which the Congress shall think necessary and proper")

Anti-federalist #51: DO CHECKS AND BALANCES REALLY SECURE THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE? (warnings about the corruption of Congress and the lack of sufficient controls on it)

Anti-federalist #78: THE POWER OF THE JUDICIARY (warnings on the lack of checks and balances on the Supreme Court. Excerpt: "The supreme court under this constitution would be exalted above all other power in the government, and subject to no control. The business of this paper will be to illustrate this, and to show the danger that will result from it. I question whether the world ever saw, in any period of it, a court of justice invested with such immense powers, and yet placed in a situation so little responsible.")

And so on.

The anti-federalists foresaw and warned about almost every weakness and loophole in the US Constitution which today's conservatives bemoan. Far from being "irrelevant", history has shown them to have been right on the money on the issues of how certain parts of the US Constitution were not sufficiently protected against abuse, or openly invited abuse. Far from being the work of the "genius" of Hamilton et al, who trusted too much to the good will and wisdom (*cough*) of those in power, the US Constitution would have been a far better document had the concerns of the anti-federalists been heeded and addressed.

Even in their own time, however, they managed to win an important victory which has immeasurably improved the US Constitution -- imagine what our government would be like today without it:

Anti-federalist #84: ON THE LACK OF A BILL OF RIGHTS (Excerpt: "This principle, which seems so evidently founded in the reason and nature of things, is confirmed by universal experience. Those who have governed, have been found in all ages ever active to enlarge their powers and abridge the public liberty. This has induced the people in all countries, where any sense of freedom remained, to fix barriers against the encroachments of their rulers.")

131 posted on 05/30/2003 1:43:20 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Don't forget that Dr. Locke was the leading publicist of the Whigs and most of his political writings are propoganda for their cause.
132 posted on 05/30/2003 1:43:59 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Bump
133 posted on 05/30/2003 1:44:31 PM PDT by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Are there Cliff Notes available for The Bible? Or maybe "Idiot's Guide To Christ", etc. I HATE reading. I recognized a few of the texts on the list but have read none of them. I can read, of course, I just HATE reading. I like to listen.
134 posted on 05/30/2003 1:46:14 PM PDT by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Here's an interesting site with an extensive set of links to online "greatest books":

http://books.mirror.org/gb.titles.html

135 posted on 05/30/2003 1:47:25 PM PDT by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
I agree, but not too many college students can handle the disalogue between the two sides. Too many think the Constitution is a sacred text/dusty old document. The idea that brilliant could becomes so engaged in its issue is beyond all buy the two per cent. who are able to think in historical terms.
136 posted on 05/30/2003 1:48:27 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
That is soo cool!
137 posted on 05/30/2003 1:49:49 PM PDT by gavriloprincip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
I'm glad Anthem put you to sleep. TYou were probably a good student. It was designed to be as simple a statement as possible and is often recommended for children. She wrote it for the express purpose of reaching semi-literate people who she felt needed to start somewhere. Of her fiction, Atlas Shrugged is the most on-point of her philosophy.

Yes she is not religious and does not try to mask that to gain a broader audience. Many of us are not religious but that does not detract from what she has to say about objectivism

138 posted on 05/30/2003 1:50:54 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
great thread bump
139 posted on 05/30/2003 1:51:31 PM PDT by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
.
140 posted on 05/30/2003 1:51:52 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (In those days... Every man did that which was right in his own eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
I have started a new thread for children's books:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/920480/posts

141 posted on 05/30/2003 1:52:26 PM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter; ABG(anybody but Gore); Angelwood; arazitjh; b4its2late; backhoe; bamafour; ...
If you have a moment, check out this thread.

5.56mm

142 posted on 05/30/2003 1:57:15 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Socialism by Von Mises
Theory of Money and Credit By Von Mises
The Sword of Imagination by Russel Kirk
Roots of American Order by Russel Kirk
Memoirs of a Revolutionist by Peter Kropotkin
Everythning by Dostoyevski
the list goes on and on
143 posted on 05/30/2003 1:58:18 PM PDT by erinjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

And I certainly know the difference between the greatest leaders America ever produced: Washington, Hamilton, Adams, Madison, Marshall and their trivial opponents whose names will become more obscure as the ages and the glory of their antagonists progress.

Hamilton and Madison were so far above the antis it is laughable. The document they produced and implemented is the greatest political work ever conceived by man. Federalist is the greatest work of policical science in the last millenium at least, no, make it the last two millenia.

I agere with all except the underlined statements, which reveal extreme and unwarranted predudice. Would the Federalist papers be the great work that they are without having to deal with anti-fed arguments. Would there even be a BILL OF RIGHTS WITHOUT HENRY?

Rights: Patrick Henry, Virginia Ratifying Convention

A Bill of Rights is a favourite thing with the Virginians, and the people of the other States likewise. It may be their prejudice, but the Government ought to suit their geniuses, otherwise its operation will be unhappy. A Bill of Rights, even if its necessity be doubtful, will exclude the possibility of dispute, and with great submission, I think the best way is to have no dispute. In the present Constitution, they are restrained from issuing general warrants to search suspected places, or seize persons not named, without evidence of the commission of the fact, &c. There was certainly some celestial influence governing those who deliberated on that Constitution:--For they have with the most cautious and enlightened circumspection, guarded those indefeasible rights, which ought ever to be held sacred. The officers of Congress may come upon you, fortified with all the terrors of paramount federal authority.--Excisemen may come in multitudes:--For the limitation of their numbers no man knows.--They may, unless the General Government be restrained by a Bill of Rights, or some similar restriction, go into your cellars and rooms, and search, ransack and measure, everything you eat, drink and wear. They ought to be restrained within proper bounds. With respect to the freedom of the press, I need say nothing; for it is hoped that the Gentlemen who shall compose Congress, will take care as little as possible, to infringe the rights of human [Volume 1, Page 471] nature.--This will result from their integrity. They should from prudence, abstain from violating the rights of their constituents. They are not however expressly restrained.--But whether they will intermeddle with that palladium of our liberties or not, I leave you to determine.

NARA | Exhibit Hall | The Founding Fathers

The original states, except Rhode Island, collectively appointed 70 individuals to the Constitutional Convention, but a number did not accept or could not attend. Those who did not attend included Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Samuel Adams and, John Hancock.

In all, 55 delegates attended the Constitutional Convention sessions, but only 39 actually signed the Constitution. The delegates ranged in age from Jonathan Dayton, aged 26, to Benjamin Franklin, aged 81, who was so infirm that he had to be carried to sessions in a sedan chair. You can also read a general biographical overview of the delegates.

Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry, lawyer, patriot, and orator, was a living symbol of the American struggle for liberty and self-government. From the day in 1760 when he appeared in Williamsburg to take his attorney's examination before Robert Carter Nicholas, Edmund Pendleton, John and Peyton Randolph, and George Wythe, Patrick Henry's story is inseparable from the stream of Virginia history.

OFFICES HELD: Delegate, Virginia House of Burgesses, 1765-1775; Member, Virginia Committee of Correspondence, 1773; Delegate, Continental Congress, 1774-1775; Delegate, Virginia Convention, 1776; Governor of Virginia, 1776-1779, 1784-1786; Delegate, Virginia Constitution Ratification Convention, 1788

MISCELLANEOUS: Patrick Henry was one of the most outspoken opponents of the Stamp Act. On May 29, 1765, he introduced seven radical resolutions in the Virginia House of Burgesses. Five of the seven resolutions were adopted on May 30, though one was reconsidered the next day (after Henry's departure) and removed.

In May 1774, a message from the Massachusetts Committee of Correspondence informed Virginians of the closing of the port of Boston. The Virginia House of Burgesses set aside June 1, 1774, as a day of "Fasting, Humiliation, and Prayer" in support of the citizens of Boston. Governor Dunmore dissolved the assembly, but 89 of the Burgesses gathered at the Raleigh Tavern and, under Henry's leadership, proposed that all the colonies meet in a Continental congress.

In April 1775, shortly after news reached Virginia that American colonists had clashed with British troops in Lexington, Massachusetts, Henry learned that Governor Dunmore had seized gunpowder from the Magazine in Williamsburg. Henry collected the militia of Hanover County and marched toward Williamsburg. He sent a message to the governor demanding that the gunpowder be returned to representatives of the colony. Governor Dunmore paid the Virginians money equal to the value of the powder, then issued a proclamation outlawing "a certain Patrick Henry" for disturbing the peace of the colony.

 

144 posted on 05/30/2003 1:58:33 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
all are available online in ebook format. Check www.blackmask.com for ebooks for free.

I would add

The illiad and the oddessy (I just like them)

1984
Animal Farm
Brave New World
(it just fits with the EU right now)

Why only 10?
145 posted on 05/30/2003 1:59:22 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tuna_battle_slight_return
If that photo included her broom, it would be a good Halloween read.
146 posted on 05/30/2003 2:06:31 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
How About having them all read the Constitution then they could read the books that made it possible
147 posted on 05/30/2003 2:08:42 PM PDT by erinjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Stranger and a Strange Land
by Heinlein

very good entertaining book

Its about a Martian named Smith.
148 posted on 05/30/2003 2:08:45 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Why don't you post some of the nutball titles, too? Not just those which SOUND reasonable. I don't oppose reading these essays merely believe putting them in the exalted status of the Federalist is ridiculous.

As far as the BoRs goes the best thinkers of that day: Hamilton and Madison, claimed it was unnecessary because the constitution didn't give the fedgov the power to violate those rights anyway. However, knowing that it was necessary to prevent the propagandists from defeating the constitution they both agreed to amendment the document after passage.

#11 was falacious since the Commerce clause was not abused until the 1930s. At any rate Hamilton always said no constitution could survive evil men if the population was somnambulent.

#12 was shown to be wrong almost immediately as the fedgov ran surpluses until Jefferson's foreign policy destroyed the revenue base.

#17 Federal power has not subverted state power any more than it should have. It is amusing to find those trying to defend state power when it has invariably been used or not used far less appropriately than federal. Look at your state legislature and tell me with a straight face it is better than Congress. Federal power has grown precisely because of the incompetence, corruption and lamebrainedness of the state governments.

#23 Indicates a lack of awareness of what Federalism means.

#26 More BS. Warrants are required for legal searches and even before the 4th the fedgov did not have those powers nor were they ever proposed.

#32 Not only did the constitution specify the powers and limits of taxation but the USSC declared extensions of that power to be unconstitutional.

#46 More falsehood. The implied powers gives Congress no ability to violate either the letter or spirit of the constitution.

#51 Checks and balances have worked well over the centuries. Compare that to an government which consisted only of Congress with no power.

#78 The Court has performed its constitutional role very well over the years. It does not control the other branches and, in fact, Congress can limit what it even considers.

That list illustrates why the antis were Losers. Hamilton ripped them to shreds, as he did anyone who tried to stand against him.

149 posted on 05/30/2003 2:10:16 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Animal Farm got honorable mention.

Why only 10?

Frivolous Courses Pervasive at Top American Colleges Despite the failure of Karl Marx's economic theories, courses devoted to him curiously abound in literature, sociology, anthropology and a host of other areas that Marx paid very little attention to while he was alive. A sampling of courses that students can choose from include Amherst's "Taking Marx Seriously," Duke's "Marxism and Society," UC-Santa Barbara's "Black Marxism," Rutgers's "Marxist Literary Theory," and Wisconsin's "Marxism and the Black Experience." Marx's theories may be dead in Eastern Europe, but they are alive and well on American college campuses.

Bizarre Classes Proliferate on America's 'Elite' Campuses Marxism, environmentalism, homosexuality, multiculturalism, and feminism now dominate the curricula of many elite colleges and universities. Critics contend that these areas of study are often intellectually vacuous, politically-charged, or both.

Pedophilia 101 at Cornell Students at Cornell University are used to courses like "Spike Lee Films," "Concepts of Race and Racism," "Whose Families? Whose Values?," "Domestic Television," "Music and Queer Identity," and "Introduction to Sexual Minorities."

Indeed, as Campus Report has chronicled, even the most cursory perusal of the Ithaca, New York school's course catalog reveals a burgeoning curriculum of frivolous, politically-charged, and downright bizarre classes. The university's administration, engaged in an indefatigable crusade for "diversity," has given free reign to the faculty to incorporate its every radical whim and every extreme agenda into the classroom. The results have been striking. There are courses at Cornell that artfully breach every imaginable-and many unimaginable-standard of most students.

One recent offering, however, has crossed the threshold from the merely absurd to the potentially dangerous.

The syllabus for "The Sexual Child" reads like a veritable who's-who of pro-pedophilia academics and activists. Among the authors presented in the course are Theo Sandfort, formerly on the board of directors of Paidika, a pro-pedophilia magazine based in Amsterdam; Daniel Tsang, the author of AIDS Taboo, purports to deliver an "academic" analysis of pedophilia; Pat Califia, a self-proclaimed "sexual outlaw" and author of the essay "The Age of Consent: The Great Kiddy-Porn Panic of '77" and the book Macho Sluts; and Havelock Ellis, author of "The School Friendships of Girls" and a reputed eugenicist.

150 posted on 05/30/2003 2:15:02 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson