Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon
On the contrary, it appears your position is the one that's currently lacking in evidence from empirical science (although I've joined this thread late -- if you posted some earlier which I've missed, please let me know).

Haha. I'm not the one who uses "empirical science" as my basis in fact. Since neodarwinists do, therefore, when they go outside of empirical science, as you have done here, you are contradicting your own scientific epistemology. Can't you see that?

578 posted on 06/09/2003 2:40:26 PM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]


To: exmarine
Since neodarwinists do, therefore, when they go outside of empirical science, as you have done here, you are contradicting your own scientific epistemology. Can't you see that?

So? How many times do you have be told that science is not built upon philosophy?

584 posted on 06/09/2003 3:20:18 PM PDT by balrog666 (When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson