Skip to comments.
MISSING OUT: Poor families face the reality of no tax rebate
The Grand Rapids Press ^
| Wednesday, June 04, 2003
| Ted Roelofs
Posted on 06/04/2003 4:47:05 PM PDT by FourPeas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: FourPeas
U.S. Rep. Vern Ehlers, R-Grand Rapids: "Since the purpose is to help people with children, then it makes sense to be sure it applies to everyone who has children."
Huh? Is this a joke? Oh, I forgot; logic doesn't matter -- it's for the children!
21
posted on
06/04/2003 5:06:45 PM PDT
by
Fraulein
To: Xenalyte
and Palmer also gets a federal subsidy to pay most of her rent. The taxpayers are already giving her free housing, I would bet she's getting food stamps, WIC, Medicaid, school lunches, energy assistance and lots of other free things ----she pays no taxes so shouldn't get a refund for something she didn't give ----$15,000 spending money wouldn't be too bad. Over $1200 a month just to buy non-essentials?
22
posted on
06/04/2003 5:06:58 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: Fraulein
Ehlers is one of the biggest jokes. I cringe every time I see the 'R' behind his name.
23
posted on
06/04/2003 5:08:12 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
To: basil
They need to call it what it is: A HANDOUT because they feel guilty.
24
posted on
06/04/2003 5:09:12 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: TheDon
Apparently it's back.
Isn't this a TAX HIKE for us??????
25
posted on
06/04/2003 5:10:10 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: spodefly
Just so I am sure I understand the purpose of the Federal Government...The tone and slant of this article expertly panders to the Lowest Common Denominator mentality. And, as sad as it is, this is from a newspaper in a decidedly conservative Republican part of the country.
26
posted on
06/04/2003 5:10:12 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
To: FITZ
The taxpayers are already giving her free housing, I would bet she's getting food stamps, WIC, Medicaid, school lunches, energy assistance and lots of other free things ----she pays no taxes so shouldn't get a refund for something she didn't give ----$15,000 spending money wouldn't be too bad. Over $1200 a month just to buy non-essentials? I thought people making $15K/year were ineligible for most of the handouts available to those making $0/year. Does anyone have specifics?
27
posted on
06/04/2003 5:12:08 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: FITZ; All
huband? HAH! And I wonder how many guys it took to produce the six little bastards. Where is their contributin? I think this should fall in the category of "you made your bed, you 'ho -- now lie in it."
To: FourPeas
Why not give these people a 10%, 20% or 30% tax cut?
Since they don't pay tax they won't be getting anything but the sound bites will be great.
29
posted on
06/04/2003 5:22:27 PM PDT
by
Vinnie
To: FourPeas
If you gave a wedding reception, and the caterer overcharged you and you called him on it, I guess it's okay if the caterer just hands the refund to a guest or who looks needy, or gives an equal amount to each of your guests.
No, it should go back to you, the person who paid the bill. If you want to keep it, invest it, or give it away, that is for you to decide.
30
posted on
06/04/2003 5:24:30 PM PDT
by
Montfort
To: FourPeas
If you pay taxes, you get a tax cut. If you don't pay taxes, you don't get a tax cut. Is it that hard to understand? I forget, we're dealing with socialists here.
31
posted on
06/04/2003 5:25:38 PM PDT
by
Sparta
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: FourPeas
I tell you what. She can have my cut and my rebate and I'll take her tax burden. How can anybody seriously argue for a tax rate cut to less than zero?
To: FourPeas
Twenty-six years old, SIX KIDS for chrissakes. DOES THIS NEWSPAPER EXPECT US TO THINK SHE IS MAINSTREAM? Does this paper expect us to have sympathy for her? I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that all of her brood will be doing jail time in the next ten years.
How many times has this woman made the wrong choice in her life?
To: FourPeas
It appears that Kalala Palmer has neither learned to use the word "no" nor understands the meaning of the word "rebate".
To: muir_redwoods
How can anybody seriously argue for a tax rate cut to less than zero? Democrats can. They don't want people who pay taxes to get a tax cut. But those who pay no taxes they argue should get a tax rebate.
They're nuts.
35
posted on
06/04/2003 5:49:16 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: FourPeas
I'm going to run to the store and whine about a $400 refund for the check I did not give them.
How much sympathy do you think I will get?
36
posted on
06/04/2003 5:52:07 PM PDT
by
Samwise
(There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil.)
To: FourPeas
Bush aides say the measure ... is fair, because low-income families ... pay no income tax. What can be clearer than that? Or is this another exercise in liberal "logic," where up is down, strong is weak, darkness is light, and inequity is fair?
37
posted on
06/04/2003 5:52:25 PM PDT
by
IronJack
To: FourPeas
MISSING OUT: Poor families face the reality of no tax rebate Get a violin and sing me a sob story.
38
posted on
06/04/2003 5:56:09 PM PDT
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
(No animals were harmed during the making of this post.)
To: Samwise
None...they might call the funny farm for a pick up!
39
posted on
06/04/2003 5:56:56 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Oh, she can afford to have a membership to the YMCA? How about dumping that membership fee and calling it her "rebate", "tax cut" or whatever.
Cry me a river.
40
posted on
06/04/2003 6:01:46 PM PDT
by
Marie Antoinette
(Militant Mom of 6 with NO YMCA membership!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson