Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: steplock
I have a conflict here. I am for school choice. I am not saying that all parents who choose cyber schools can not homeschool or unschool, but how can we say we are for school choice when we want to deny some people, who could not do organic homeschooling, their choice.

I understand the fear is that our freedoms would erode, but why can't we have it both ways. The more people out of the government schools the better.

If the greedy jackels want their money, they will have to pay attention to the free market.

There will have to be changes made, because people are taking their kids OUT for a reason. IF they clean up the public schools and everyone gets choice, then isn't that ideal compared to the monolopy we have now? BTW I unschool :}

17 posted on 06/09/2003 5:06:52 AM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: No More Gore Anymore; ladylib; steplock; TruthConquers; lvmyfrdm; tutstar; annyokie; ppaul; ...
I understand the fear is that our freedoms would erode, but why can't we have it both ways.

Sorry... I don't think we can have it both ways.

SepSchool has a great link that address some of these issues... some of their points are below or to read in its entirety click on

What about tax-funded vouchers, tax credits, and charter schools?

While tax-funded vouchers, education or scholarship tax credits, and charter schools introduce sorely-needed competition into schooling, they have at least four serious flaws which outweigh their good side.

(This article will refer to vouchers. When all the camouflage is removed, these flaws are also inherent in universal tax credits, refundable tax credits, scholarship tax credits, and charter schools.)

1. Vouchers spread the dependency attitude to independent families currently paying for their children's education.

2. Vouchers obscure the difference between parents who are willing to sacrifice to send their children to a private school from those who are unwilling to sacrifice. This means private schools will lower their standards of who gets in.

3. By creating a flow of money from the state to private schools, vouchers pave a wide road for additional regulations and controls. "When you reach for the money is when they slip on the handcuffs."

A common control is to require voucher-redeeming schools to administer standardized tests. These tests, in effect, dictate the curriculum, as the private schools do not wish to have lower test scores than the "public" schools.

4. Other than expensive prep schools, private and religious schools that refuse to accept the voucher will lose a significant number of their students to voucher-redeeming schools. Many will face the choice of accepting the voucher and its controls or going out of business.

The net result of these flaws is that private and religious schools will become more and more like the "public" schools. In effect, vouchers and other schemes of using tax funds for education will kill the goose that is laying the golden eggs of private education.

26 posted on 06/09/2003 6:42:23 AM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: No More Gore Anymore
If homeschoolers choose a cyber school or anything affiliated with a govt. school, will that homeschooler be counted as a public school student, and will that district receive fed. money as a result?
57 posted on 06/09/2003 1:24:59 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (Let's show Janet the door in 2006!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson