Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children
Journal of the Family Research Institute

Posted on 06/08/2003 8:38:06 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: Dataman
LOL !!
61 posted on 06/09/2003 12:49:30 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Either that, or the study shows the higher rate at which homosexuals are caught/prosecuted for such crimes. Whereas heterosexual child molestors may go un-caught forever. Not to mention how many male family members (fathers, brothers, uncles) or family friends molest little girls... most of which go unnoticed and unprosecuted.

It is a fact of human nature that more effort goes into solving crimes that are "more offensive" to people. So particularly heinous crimes are given more attention -- note the extra (even extreme) attention paid to the Laci Peterson case, compared to the THREE other cases in that same area where a pregnant woman was murdered late in her pregnancy. But Laci Peterson was an attractive white woman, whereas the other murdered pregnant women were either not white or not attractive. Since most people consider homosexual child molestation to be more offensive than heterosexual child molestation, I would imagine the perpetrators are "hunted down" more diligently and more successfully as compared with heterosexual child molestors.

(I don't know how anyone can say that homo or hetero child molestation is more or less offensive than the other - ALL child molestation is offensive to me, whether homo or hetero.)
62 posted on 06/09/2003 1:01:08 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Agape
Our society is very oppressive to gays. I'm not saying that is right or wrong, but I would think that would cause some psychological damage

Society is oppressive to child molesters and advocates of murder too. That isn't a bad thing. Homosexuals can and have carry on in secret without penalty but when they try to recruit, molest, and impose their valueless behavior on everyone else, society should react.

I suspect some of the mental damage was already there since the overwhelming majority of gays studied have been found to either have been molested as children or have a milquetoast (or absent) father and a dominant mother.

63 posted on 06/09/2003 6:07:08 AM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: Clint N. Suhks; longtermmemmory; scripter; All
"It should also be noted that female on female abuse exists but because it is under reported it does not hit these academic search studies."

"Are you familiar with Butterfly Kisses, the lesbian version of NAMBLA? Their web site moves often but this link has snap shots of some of the pages, it’s real sick stuff."


Also documented in the thread "Meet 'Women's Auxiliary of NAMBLA'"

68 posted on 06/09/2003 6:27:05 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: breakem
Once again, we're seeing a thread dominated by those that can't separate the "homosexual agenda" from individuals. These people go nuts when the media labels abortion clinic bombers as "Christians", but they have no problem labelling all homosexuals as degenerate filth in one swoop.
70 posted on 06/09/2003 6:34:41 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Thanks for the reminder about NAWGLA. That thread deserves to be pinged more often.
71 posted on 06/09/2003 7:18:17 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Let's see, if homos rape kids at a higher percentage it's because they are pathological (thanks Dr.), but if men murder at a higher rate there is no pathology Wow!

No Einstein, men don’t murder because they are men, hehehe…but maybe you can cite the research studies that prove your “theory”.

72 posted on 06/09/2003 7:19:11 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Most murderers are bipeds.

That's a good point. Let's follow the logic of some:

But if you're a biped, maybe you should be once 'group libel' becomes the norm. Guilty until proven innocent.
</sarcasm>

Thanks for the insight here and on other threads. We need more folks like you speaking out on this issue.

73 posted on 06/09/2003 7:25:06 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Yes, but the incidence of male initiated rape is much higher than that of female initiated rape. So by your logic we should conclude that MALES are flawed and should be shunned, punished, or destroyed. Why don't you follow your own logic consistently????

You’re comparing apples and cow pies. Homosexual pathology is a link that causes an increased rate to offend, being a male is NOT pathology and therefor you can’t compare it as reasoning for offenses against women. Logic requires a consistent measure. Nice try though, thanks for playing.

74 posted on 06/09/2003 7:30:10 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict
Since most people consider homosexual child molestation to be more offensive than heterosexual child molestation, I would imagine the perpetrators are "hunted down" more diligently and more successfully as compared with heterosexual child molestors.

That’s not really a credible argument given that child molestation is in its self a heinous crime regardless of who does it. You confirm this in your next statement. “(I don't know how anyone can say that homo or hetero child molestation is more or less offensive than the other - ALL child molestation is offensive to me, whether homo or hetero.)”

75 posted on 06/09/2003 7:38:49 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon; Clint N. Suhks; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; saradippity; ...
When I first went to the link [Clint N. Suhks] provided, I was skeptical about the authenticity of the references. After a little searching and hacking I found the actual female childlove site...

Thanks for finding the new location. In post 68 of this thread you can find a link to the site when we first found it.

76 posted on 06/09/2003 7:40:57 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
Once again, we're seeing a thread dominated by those that can't separate the "homosexual agenda" from individuals.

Actually we’re talking about a research study.

These people go nuts when the media labels abortion clinic bombers as "Christians", but they have no problem labelling all homosexuals as degenerate filth in one swoop.

Last time I looked being a Christian is not a behavioral pathology linked to abortion clinic bombers, if you have any research proving your theory I’d be interested.

77 posted on 06/09/2003 7:48:47 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
Goos job!
78 posted on 06/09/2003 7:52:35 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Girl Scouts Attacked for Inclusion of Lesbians and Gays By June B. Mire, Ph.D.

A group from the religious right called the American Family Association, based in Tupelo Mississippi, is attacking the Girl Scouts because that organization refuses to discriminate against lesbians and gays.

Unlike the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts has always been inclusive. All girls are welcome in Girls Scouts, not just the pretty ones or the popular ones or the skinny ones or the ones with traditional families or the straight ones. Inclusive means just that.

In the mid-90s, the organization went on the public record with a statement to the Associated Press that said it does not discriminate based on sexual orientation.

A few months ago, the Girl Scout national president, Connie Matsui, made favorable remarks about a video called "That's A Family," which positively depicts lesbian and gay family groups. (Ms. Matsui attended a screening at The White House during the final days of the Clinton Administration.)

The bigots at the American Family Association have sent 10,000 letters of protest to the national Girl Scout organization, demanding that Ms. Matsui retract her statement and/or resign.

In contrast, the Girl Scouts have received only 5 -- that's right, five --letters of support. Please write to Ms. Matsui and let her know that you appreciate the Girl Scouts' stand on behalf of diversity. And please forward this message to all of your friends.

Send messages to cmatsui@girlscouts.org

Important to note this directive:

It's important that the Girl Scouts hear from us, since they are beginning to equivocate on their stand. Let them know that they are doing the right thing. -----------------------------------------------------------

79 posted on 06/09/2003 8:11:11 AM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I tire easilly of you.

Then for goodness sake take a hike.

80 posted on 06/09/2003 8:19:33 AM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson