Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Sherman, PhD, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government
FOXNews ^ | June 10, 2003 | The O'Reilly Factor

Posted on 06/10/2003 5:29:02 PM PDT by an amused spectator

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

I just watched The O'Reilly Factor, and saw the most vile piece of Clinton-loving Stalinite scum that you'll ever have the pleasure of not meeting, name of Elizabeth Sherman, "PhD", out of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

These are the kind of Stalinesque historical revisionist that we're going to be faced with, sneering, mocking and sincerely believing that they can make EVERYTHING go down the memory hole.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hillary; juanitabroaddrick; stalinitelies; tenuredradicals
Of course, a sneering Marxist PiledhigherandDeeper like Sherman doesn't have a public web page or e-mail address where she can be debated:

http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/ksginfo/director.nsf/7051727ea3ac44fc852564c2004da40e/6f04cac094b7efd685256d410010a207?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,sherman

1 posted on 06/10/2003 5:29:02 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I hope you weren't watching. Stuff like this doesn't usually get on my nerves, because I know the score with these so-called "professors" and "educators", but I know I would have coldly torn Sherman to shreds with facts and logic had I been there.

O'Reilly showed up with an empty ammo bandolier.

2 posted on 06/10/2003 5:32:18 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
http://sa.hbs.edu/wsa/conf2002/public%20leadership.html


3 posted on 06/10/2003 5:33:24 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I hope you weren't watching. Stuff like this doesn't usually get on my nerves, because I know the score with these so-called "professors" and "educators", but I know I would have coldly torn Sherman to shreds with facts and logic had I been there.

O'Reilly showed up with an empty ammo bandolier.

(No, I wasn't talking to myself the first time. *grin* )

4 posted on 06/10/2003 5:33:49 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Exactly my reaction. We're just jealous that Hillary might actually create and live her own life apart from Bill's sex scandals. Excuse me, miz professor, but we're not the ones writing books about his dalliances. O'Reilly let her say stuff like, "I won't get as much time on Fox as Juanita Broaddrick." No sh--, Sherlock.
5 posted on 06/10/2003 5:33:52 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
O'Reilly was at the Kennedy school for a while.
6 posted on 06/10/2003 5:34:17 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Did you catch any of it? Omigod!
7 posted on 06/10/2003 5:34:41 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Did not see but I can imagine what went on that makes you blow a gasket. From the photo, she looks way too happy as she blithely spreads her DemocRAT lies.
8 posted on 06/10/2003 5:36:33 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Newsmax: Juanita Broaddrick Slams Hillary's Anti-rape Hypocrisy (Tuesday, April 30, 2002)
9 posted on 06/10/2003 5:37:25 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I also saw that sneering witch. She seemed tightly wound over the fact that FNC is going to air Hannity's interview of Juanita Broaddrick at 9:00PM CST.

Actually, I found it sort of comical that she lost it the way she did! (Call me sick, but I absolutely adore it when supposedly calm, compassionate, "loving" liberals go all hysterical on TV! :)
10 posted on 06/10/2003 5:38:54 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
She was nauseating...nothing wrong, nope, no rape, nothing...

Of course, it goes without saying that she would assault any conservative who happened to the same...but that's a minor point.

White trash.

11 posted on 06/10/2003 5:39:03 PM PDT by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Oh my gosh, have you ever seen two dumber women? Excuse me, we are talking about rape here. How could they be tired(sure) of hearing about Juanita. They hardly heard of her before. And, if I am incorrect, please correct me, don't we send rapists and their co-conspirators to jail in this country?
12 posted on 06/10/2003 5:39:17 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
It bothered me that there really are people out there like her that idolize the klintoons, forgiving every transgression, and sneering at every real American that wants justice.

I know she is just a typical liberal, truth hating, leftist apologist but it still should be a wakeup call for 2004. This is a small sample of the condesending, anti-truth campaign from the left that we will see for the next 2 years (at a minimum).

13 posted on 06/10/2003 5:39:26 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Giuliani Sex Questions Open Pandora's Box for Hillary

Worse still, Broaddrick herself suspected that Mrs. Clinton knew about her own rape, after the two met at a Democratic Party fundraiser three weeks after the attack.

The Clinton rape accuser told Christopher Anderson, author of Bill and Hillary: The Marriage, "Hillary sought me out, and when somebody told her where I was, she came straight for me and cornered me and grabbed my hand very forcefully."

"I want you to know how grateful we are for all you've done for Bill," Broaddrick said Hillary told her, before adding pointedly, "And for all you'll keep doing."

Broaddrick said that Mrs. Clinton continued to keep a tight grip on her hand while she stared, silently, into her eyes until the intended message was received. "I knew exactly what she meant — that I was to keep my mouth shut," Broaddrick said.

Broaddrick's charge that Mrs. Clinton's tried to silence her is bolstered by the Clinton administration's admission that Hillary played a key role in White House efforts to discredit another Clinton sex-assault accuser, Kathleen Willey.

=========================

But it really has NOTHING to do with Hillary, does it, Ms. Sherman? Just another faithful foller of Hilla the Dread.

14 posted on 06/10/2003 5:40:55 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
disgusting!
15 posted on 06/10/2003 5:41:39 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
'This is all about Bill Clinton's old sex scandals, and has nothing to do with Hillary'

This is not about Bill Clinton's sex scandals, it is about RAPE, and about Hillary knowing what her husband did and thanking Juanita Broadrick for keeping quiet about it. Does this nation want a RAPIST ENABLER as a senator and possibly our President? Once (twice) was more than enough!

16 posted on 06/10/2003 5:41:50 PM PDT by ALASKA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
"I hope you weren't watching. Stuff like this doesn't usually get on my nerves, because I know the score with these so-called "professors" and "educators", but I know I would have coldly torn Sherman to shreds with facts and logic had I been there."

I so agree with you.

17 posted on 06/10/2003 5:41:51 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Humidston; Benrand; freekitty; zip
See my post #14 to doug from upland for the reason for my objection to Sherman's Stalinesque revisionism.

Doug has been a mighty FR partisan in pursuing this issue over the years here.

18 posted on 06/10/2003 5:43:22 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Saw it and kept wondering what she found funny about rape.
19 posted on 06/10/2003 5:45:09 PM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainie

(the lefty) on the left

20 posted on 06/10/2003 5:47:05 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.

21 posted on 06/10/2003 5:47:09 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator; doug from upland
Doug has been a mighty FR partisan in pursuing this issue over the years here.

Indeed he has.

22 posted on 06/10/2003 5:48:08 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Who's going to make a Juanita Broaddrick live thread?
23 posted on 06/10/2003 5:48:34 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
As I am sure you are aware none of this is about rape or illegal acts or breaking the law or anything else. It's about political ideology. If you subscribe to a leftist ideology and are accused of rape or any crime, you are simply innocent. If you are a conservative in hot water you are guilty until proven innocent.
24 posted on 06/10/2003 5:48:45 PM PDT by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
She kept saying that the Juanita Broadrick story was old news. Well, what is new that is in Hillary's book?
25 posted on 06/10/2003 5:50:48 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I understand your rage and I agree, but sometimes when I post here, I imagine the leftist in question reading our words.

Tonight I prefer to laugh at that evil "w"itch and find her comments totally comical - in the face of cold hard facts. Juanita is FAR more believable than any Kool-Aid drinking wonk leftist. And of course the part that makes me really smile and feel smug is the fact that we're winning. We're positively kicking their fannies and they're frustrated and enraged. I just love that part - especially after eight long years of that liar with his p*nis hanging out of his shorts!

We should tell her to "put some ice on it."
26 posted on 06/10/2003 5:56:51 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Wasn't Sherman some kind of diversity consultant for the Clinton Administration? If so, she can't burn her bridges, else she'll jeopardize some of those diversity or women's issues gigs for which she lives.
27 posted on 06/10/2003 5:58:52 PM PDT by Catalonia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Lizzie will doubtless go through life frustrated by the fact that she was (one of the few) never ***ked by the Arky White Trash.
28 posted on 06/10/2003 5:59:04 PM PDT by clintonh8r (You can have no better friend and no worse enemy than a US Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Nice 20 year old picture
29 posted on 06/10/2003 6:04:30 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I so wanted to wipe that sneering, smart-alecky, grinning smirk off her know-it-all face. Even when others were talking, she kept it up. She chose not to believe anything negative about Clinton, (or believes it and openly denies it) so she puts down anyone who would dare to smirch her hero.

I wish O'Reilly had taken the gloves off.

30 posted on 06/10/2003 6:06:26 PM PDT by Exit148 (Just added another $3.06 to the Loose Change Club collection bag for the next Freep-a-thon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
O'Reilly showed up with an empty ammo bandolier.

I agree totally. Here's what I posted on another thread:

Clinton's defenders always raise the Al Capone defense. "You got nuttin' on me copper!" No one ever proved in a court of law that Al Capone was in the mafia, that he was a part of a criminal gang, or that the ordered people to be murdered. They did get him on tax evasion instead. They got Clinton on perjury instead. That Capone was never convicted in court does mot mean that he was never in the mafia. That Clinton was never convicted in court does not prove he was never a rapist.

I suggest you look into the case of Army SSG Delmar Simpson. He was an Army instructor who was seduced by some of his female students. He maintained his innocence by virtue of the fact that he was seduced and therefore could not be guilty of rape. The Clinton Justice Department and the Army came up with a new principle to justify convicting him of rape. They claimed something called "constructive force" or the idea that because of SSG Simpson's "overwhelming power" over his students in a military training environment there was no such thing as consensual sex with a student -- it was rape even if the trainees consented. The same Clinton White House that created this new legal principle went on to deny that the President of the United States did not have any extra power over a 22-year old intern. SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day.

Clinton at any time can prove Juanita Broaddrick wrong in the details she gave. She said Clinton said "You don't have to worry about getting pregnant because I had measles in adulthood and am sterile." He confused measles with some other disease that if you get it in adulthood will make you sterile, but that's beside the point. Did he have measles in adulthood? If he did that is a detail that only Broaddrick could have known from her encounter with him. And guess what? Clinton is the only President since Eisenhower NOT to relase his medical records. His remain sealed. What is he hiding? Is he covering up the one fact that can prove Broaddrick right?

31 posted on 06/10/2003 6:06:51 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (As it is written, so shall it be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
He may have claimed to be sterile, but we don't even know if that was a lie..... Like all the rest of his mountains of lies. Frankly, I wouldn't trust the guy if he told me today was June 10, 2003.
32 posted on 06/10/2003 6:14:27 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day

As well he should. But then so should the Arkansas Rapist and his "enabler" and co-conspirator, The Witched Witch of The East (Chappaqua that is)

33 posted on 06/10/2003 6:23:47 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
First of all, he doesn't want his records released because it will show his sinus operations for cocaine abuse - his treatments for V.D. and of course if he is sterile - it would give strong credence to the rumor that Web Hubble probably is Chelsea's father!
34 posted on 06/10/2003 6:27:38 PM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Of course, they will not willingly be found guilty. Anybody in the Arky gang or subsequent draftees, would be swimming with the fishes. No evidence will be given against the Clintons, if they value their lifes. There is AT LEAST rumors of anybody about to testify against the Clintons (whether about Arky drug-running, drug-using, bribery, coruption or financial scams) conventiently volunteering to leave this world immediately or a victim of random crime. Can we say withhold my knowingly prescribed heart medicine for numerous hours against strong and loud requests for such --- the WhiteWater defense.

It is very interesting that someone who during all grand jury and congressional inquiries "COULD NOT RECALL," is writing a book about her time with her husband as he is an Arkansas attorney general, governor, U.S. president. If she could not recall during sworn testimony how does she suddenly remember even enough recall her life, yet enough to write a book. Follow the money---it is nothing but a bunch of fertilizer. It should be in the fiction section.

If nothing else, the Clinton should ultimately be found guilty (someday) conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to interfere with criminal investigatations, etc.... Not what they have actually done, but what they have done to hide and cover-up the crimes. Just like the Capone gang, the Possum Patch gang is good at cover-up, too.
35 posted on 06/10/2003 7:12:22 PM PDT by Jerr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I suggest you look into the case of Army SSG Delmar Simpson. He was an Army instructor who was seduced by some of his female students. He maintained his innocence by virtue of the fact that he was seduced and therefore could not be guilty of rape. The Clinton Justice Department and the Army came up with a new principle to justify convicting him of rape. They claimed something called "constructive force" or the idea that because of SSG Simpson's "overwhelming power" over his students in a military training environment there was no such thing as consensual sex with a student -- it was rape even if the trainees consented. The same Clinton White House that created this new legal principle went on to deny that the President of the United States did not have any extra power over a 22-year old intern. SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day.

This case was discussed at length here on FR. I'll have to review the Clinton "Justice" Department's view on the matter.

Excellent comparison!

36 posted on 06/10/2003 8:32:59 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lainie; dennisw; doug from upland; KPfromDerryNH; StarFan; WorkingClassFilth; All
if ever there was a USEFUL IDIOT, it is ELIZABETH SHERMAN bump!

Contrast her with the , J. Bradford DeLong, who observed clinton up close:

clinton Administration VETERAN / BERKELEY PROFESSOR: "Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."


"My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president"

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics at Berkeley
veteran of the Clinton Administration

What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it?
And was she part of it?
YOO-HOO missus clinton:
THE CLINTON RAPES ARE "UNBECOMING"
Q ERTY3BUMP

37 posted on 06/10/2003 8:41:19 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame
Q ERTY8BUMP
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme FICTIONAL TRILOGY
The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime


Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine, Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury
REAL "Living History"

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

38 posted on 06/10/2003 9:06:06 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
bump
39 posted on 06/10/2003 9:06:46 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thanks, Mia.

Info back-bump:

Mickey Edwards, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma who now teaches at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, will join his wife, Elizabeth Sherman, director of the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy, in discussing what issues would be addressed during the debate.

40 posted on 06/11/2003 4:30:29 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it?
And was she part of it?
Q ERTY3BUMP


THE CLINTON RAPES, LIVING HISTORY, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY

by Mia T, 6.11.03

The endless string of leftist co-rapist clinton puffery seems to defy not only the laws of logic and decency but the first law of thermodynamics -- conservation of energy… that is, if one fails to considers entropy.

The second law of thermodynamics states that the quality of energy in a closed system is degraded irreversibly. Physical, chemical, and electrical energy transform into thermal energy --heat. Reversing the process, e.g., heat into physical energy, cannot fully occur within the system without an inevitable loss of energy in the form of irretrievable heat. Energy is not destroyed; it is merely unavailable for producing work. (The irreversible increase of this nondisposable energy in the universe is measured by the abstract dimension called entropy.)

clinton corruption is all about the irreversible degradation of the energy in our closed system. A leftist band of heat-producing useful idiots are currently assisting in the clintons' $8-million--make that $20 million--revisionist assault.

And if ever there was a heat-producing USEFUL IDIOT, it is Harvard's ELIZABETH SHERMAN, who contends, apparently, that the clintons' rape of Broaddrick is somehow mitigated over time..

Contrast Sherman with clinton Administration VETERAN / BERKELEY PROFESSOR , J. Bradford DeLong, who observed missus clinton up close:

 

"My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president"

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics at Berkeley
veteran of the Clinton Administration
clinton Administration VETERAN / BERKELEY PROFESSOR: "Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."

There is a lot of talk these days, most notably by voluble nervous Democratic operatives like Susan Estrich, about the clintons sucking up the oxygen, but no one is paying attention to the irreversible transformation of light into heat by the clintons.

Once we understand that the latter process is irreversible, we will begin to do what we must.

THE INTERMINABLE clintons
It's time to take out the trash...
A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE...
NEW AUDIO! Hear the Bill Bennett (PARDONGATE) epilogue .
 
 
Are Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page?...
(Desperately seeking Susan.... Who spiked her, anyway?)
 
hillary clinton A SECURITY RISK: Removal Calls Begin
 
THE UNSTATED MESSAGE OF THE POWELL EVIDENCE
 
Another mistaken 'conceptzia'
WHY AMERICA (& THE WORLD) CANNOT SURVIVE ANOTHER CLINTON
(INDEED, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT WE ARE GOING TO SURVIVE THE FIRST ONE,)
 
Utter-Failure clintons Concoct Left-Wing-Radio Scheme FIG LEAF
Flower Children Fall for the 2 Self-Evident Thugs & Opportunists Yet Again
(Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation)
 
 
THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER:
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992

 How to get rid of the clintons in 3 easy steps
 
the logic of pathologic self-interest
 
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

41 posted on 06/11/2003 4:37:53 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainie
It is so predictable, neither Billy nor Hitlery would agree to go on the program and respond on their own behalf!

They always get some grape juice drinking, knee pad wearing socialist (cess pool at Kennedy School) to speak on their behalf. Since the guests on OR weren't present when these events occurred, how do they know that it didn't happen?

As Leon Panetta (Clintoooon Chief of Staff in first term) said, "WE TOOK GREAT PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT BILLY FROM RIDING ALONE IN THE PRESIDENTIAL LIMO WITH A WOMAN!"
42 posted on 06/11/2003 4:43:13 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
How very true. The facts and truth seem to be thrown out of the window.
43 posted on 06/11/2003 7:36:08 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
44 posted on 06/11/2003 2:03:25 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson