To: dsc; Qwerty
By the standards applied by the malicious and dishonest, we can't even "prove" that all rattlesnakes are venomous without individually examining each snake. After all, they assert, there might be lots of non-venomous rattlers out there, and you don't know until a "scientific study" is performed.
Just like I said, it's "rude" to ask that he provide any real evidence for his universal libel. It should be assumed that all homosexuals, without exception, are child molester wannabes and that any who might not be should be considered a rare exception and only if their existence can be verified. Of course, then it breaks into a religious rant that has no meaning to someone who isn't a Christian.
posted on 06/16/2003 6:07:13 PM PDT
(Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
"Just like I said, it's "rude" to ask that he provide any real evidence for his universal libel."
Actually, he provided some sort of story about a mental patient and his doctor... it sealed everything up nicely.
posted on 06/16/2003 8:41:07 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson