Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay couple married after ruling (Toronto, Canada)
TheStar.com ^ | June 10, 2003 | TRACEY TYLER AND TRACY HUFFMAN

Posted on 06/11/2003 5:25:36 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last
Oh, great !! They say I do, but I say Yuck!!!

I heard this on the radio a few minutes ago. I can't believe it's not posted already. (I did search).

1 posted on 06/11/2003 5:25:36 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda

More bump images HERE !

2 posted on 06/11/2003 5:27:12 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Can't they all just get back in the closet? Why must we be asked to celebrate a personality disorder?
3 posted on 06/11/2003 5:31:41 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Bush/Cheney in '04 and Tommy Daschole out the door)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; onyx; SpookBrat; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; dixiechick2000; SusanUSA; ...
Holy Cow !! I don't know what else to say.

Gay couple married after ruling (Toronto, Canada)

MICHAEL STUPARYK/TORONTO STAR
Michael Stark, left, and Michael Lashner pop champagne
and kiss after their wedding ceremony yesterday.
Leshner called the ruling, "Day One for millions of gays
and lesbians around the world."



Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.


4 posted on 06/11/2003 5:33:28 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The ability to marry, and to thereby participate in this fundamental societal institution

Go ahead you dirty perverts. Further the human race and have children.

All future rulings toward these vile, dirty animals should be based on what I think is a fundamental reason for the union in the first place.

TO HAVE CHILDREN AND CONTRIBUTE TOWARD THE FUTURE OF CIVILIZATION You dirty perverts use you sex tools and stick them in every hole that will produce nothing. Your even to stupid to realize if every one would practice you perverse cult practices you would eliminate the human race. What bunch low life, stinking bottom feeders.

5 posted on 06/11/2003 5:34:17 AM PDT by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Yuck comes to mind.
6 posted on 06/11/2003 5:34:34 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I could have got along nicely without that picture. Yuck!
7 posted on 06/11/2003 5:35:45 AM PDT by Aeronaut ("The wicked are always surprised to find nobility in the good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
***My Eyes***

I'm blind!

UGH!
8 posted on 06/11/2003 5:35:58 AM PDT by dansangel (America - love it, support it or LEAVE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
Sick fudge eaters
9 posted on 06/11/2003 5:36:45 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Just hours before, the Ontario Court of Appeal rewrote the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples, saying denying gays and lesbians the ability to marry offends their dignity,i>

Lets talk about the dignity of a man on his hands and knees with another man jamming his.... Well you get the point.

10 posted on 06/11/2003 5:38:58 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrisssssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
I whish you would quit waffling on the issue an express an opinion. :)
11 posted on 06/11/2003 5:39:37 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut; Bahbah
Yep. Yuck was my comment too.

hehe! Sorry 'bout the pic, Aeronaut. I am still in shock, and awe.

12 posted on 06/11/2003 5:40:50 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

13 posted on 06/11/2003 5:40:57 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Then, the happy couple celebrated by going cruising in the bars and picking up a few more guys!

Gay men are not interested in a monogamous relationship. They say that themselves. They get very angry when anyone suggests that the best thing to do is to be in a monogamous relationship! So, this "Marriage" thing is just a farce.

The only reason they want to get "married" is to force the rest of the world to accept their abonormal behavior. They know they are abonormal, but think it is everyone else who makes them feel that way. They have the misguided opinion that acceptence by others will make them feel more normal. That the image of a normal homelife will make them feel more normal. Fact is, they are not normal, and none of these things will change how they feel!



They are trying to legislate immorality!
14 posted on 06/11/2003 5:41:02 AM PDT by tuckrdout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dansangel
hehe ! A picture's worth a thousand words. I couldn't think of anywhere near that many words. :O)
15 posted on 06/11/2003 5:42:31 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
offends their dignity

They offend their own human dignity with their behavior. An by the way, I am not homophobic, I am homodisgustive.

16 posted on 06/11/2003 5:43:10 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
"Michael....you taste like colon".
17 posted on 06/11/2003 5:43:28 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Next in line, pedophiles, incestuous types, group sex, animal lovers, etc. Who says that they are any less deserving than these two guys?
18 posted on 06/11/2003 5:46:35 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
So, what I wondering, is if they moved to the United States, would this be a legal union in the USA? Can American homosexuals go up there to get married and then force our government to recongnise this union? Is that the new scheme?
19 posted on 06/11/2003 5:46:41 AM PDT by tuckrdout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout
... would this be a legal union in the USA?

**
I don't know anything about the law, but everything I have read before would indicate that it would not be recognized here unless a state had some sort of reciprocity law in place. (I was hoping a bunch of them would move to Canada because of this.)
20 posted on 06/11/2003 5:54:40 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Bush/Cheney in '04 and Tommy Daschole out the door)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I couldn't think of anywhere near that many words. :O)

*I* can - and they are *ALL* unprintable!

21 posted on 06/11/2003 5:55:20 AM PDT by dansangel (America - love it, support it or LEAVE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout
Fact is, they are not normal..

Exactly
22 posted on 06/11/2003 5:57:03 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Bush/Cheney in '04 and Tommy Daschole out the door)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
l just looked at a poll in the Toronto newspaper The National Post, 80% of Canadians are against this change in law.l wonder if now that the definition of marriage has been changed will polygamy be accepted as well.
23 posted on 06/11/2003 6:04:15 AM PDT by lindsay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout
Texas doesn't recognize same sex marriages period. In fact, our Governor Rick Perry just signed a new law a couple of weeks ago specifically spelling it out. We didn't NEED that law because it was already covered in the statutes. Some of the LIBS hated that too. I felt their pain - NOT !!!!
24 posted on 06/11/2003 6:04:23 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dansangel
*I* can - and they are *ALL* unprintable!

hehe ! I understand.

25 posted on 06/11/2003 6:05:46 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I'm wondering what country we will be forced to invade first in the future, Canada or Mexico.
26 posted on 06/11/2003 6:15:45 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (For or against us.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Freedom.

Gays have existed since the time of the Bible.

What is your solution? To eradicate them all as Hitler tried to do?

To spend billions of dollars on fruitless (Pardon the pun) endeavours to therapeutically turn them into heterosexuals?

Give them their own island somewhere?

Make them watch Clint Eastwood movies until they turned macho?

Live and let live, they're not harming anyone, I hope they're happy, isn't that what everyone wants?

Would Jesus approve of the frankly boorish comments I've read in this thread? Afterall, he befriended Mary Magdelaine, and spent time with lepers.

27 posted on 06/11/2003 6:55:46 AM PDT by IvanT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IvanT
Gays have existed since the time of the Bible.

So has murder, theft, and lying. Sin is sin.

What is your solution? To eradicate them all as Hitler tried to do?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman.

To spend billions of dollars on fruitless (Pardon the pun) endeavours to therapeutically turn them into heterosexuals?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman. Give them their own island somewhere?

Make them watch Clint Eastwood movies until they turned macho?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman.

Live and let live, they're not harming anyone, I hope they're happy, isn't that what everyone wants?

No, the issue here is that marrige exists between a man and a woman.

Would Jesus approve of the frankly boorish comments I've read in this thread? Afterall, he befriended Mary Magdelaine, and spent time with lepers.

Jesus (as the Son of God) also wrote the scriptures condemning homosexuality. Inconvienient to your argument, but true nonetheless. Also, Jesus also said to Mary Magdalene: "Now go, and sin no more.

28 posted on 06/11/2003 7:10:31 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("Don't believe everything you read in the newspapers." ----- Jayson Blair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
ummmmm, yeah...ok

I guess next animals will be able to wed and have the same benefits as traditional married couples.

29 posted on 06/11/2003 7:18:15 AM PDT by cherry_bomb88 (Are you on the right side of the wrong issue or the wrong side of the right issue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cherry_bomb88
I don't know if animals will wed, but my neighbor keeps saying her first husband was a pig.
30 posted on 06/11/2003 7:21:16 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; IvanT; tame
Well said, SP

See, Ivan, you're missing the point.....MARRIAGE EXISTS BETWEEN A MAN & A WOMAN

If they want to partake in fornication in their own bedrooms, so be it....just DO NOT force it on us to accept it as normal and deserving of the same rights as marriage in the traditional sense....what's next??? Accepting child molestors???? Those have existed since the dawn of time too...so, now we're supposed to just accept it?

I truly believe in the phrase "love the sinner hate the sin", I don't have any contempt or loathing for them as people, I do, however, have strong contempt for what they do, it is wrong....it always has been and it always will be.

If they want to be gay, great, but do it knowing it is unacceptable to the majority of society and therefore suffer the consequences of your actions. If you hold yourself out to be different from the "norm", expect to be treated as such.

31 posted on 06/11/2003 7:23:55 AM PDT by cherry_bomb88 (Are you on the right side of the wrong issue or the wrong side of the right issue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: breakem
ROTFL....mine was a donkey's rear end! (read a-hole)

Wait, what am I say "was"....change that to still is.

32 posted on 06/11/2003 7:25:03 AM PDT by cherry_bomb88 (Are you on the right side of the wrong issue or the wrong side of the right issue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: breakem
My first girlfriend said I was a tiger.
33 posted on 06/11/2003 7:26:55 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("Don't believe everything you read in the newspapers." ----- Jayson Blair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
...but I say Yuck!!!

That was my first reaction.

34 posted on 06/11/2003 7:29:19 AM PDT by blackbart1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout
Not in Nebraska. We have an amendment in our state constitution that recognizes marraige only as a union between a man and a woman. This was a petition initiative that ended up on the ballot and passed at general election with over 70% of the vote. The usual cast of sodomites have been screaming about it ever since. It'll end up before the Nebraska Supreme Court (God, please help us) sometime within the next 2 years, I'm guessing.

Hat-Trick

35 posted on 06/11/2003 7:29:28 AM PDT by Hat-Trick (only criminals, their advocates, and tyrants need fear guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The next types of marriages to be legalized in Canada:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926941/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926810/posts
36 posted on 06/11/2003 7:30:43 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Congratulations to Bruce and Antoine.
37 posted on 06/11/2003 7:30:54 AM PDT by Conservative til I die (They say anti-Catholicism is the thinking man's anti-Semitism; that's an insult to thinking men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
We have an amendment in our state constitution that recognizes marraige only as a union between a man and a woman.

California has a similar provision. It hasn't even proven to be a speed bump for gay activists. They are pushing a measure through lawmakers that would grant legal recognition to same-sex unions, i.e., calling it something other than "marriage" but amounting to the same thing.

38 posted on 06/11/2003 7:36:13 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
Next in line, pedophiles, incestuous types, group sex, animal lovers, etc. Who says that they are any less deserving than these two guys?

EXACTLY !

That picture deserves a barf alert if any ever did.

39 posted on 06/11/2003 7:45:32 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
I'm wondering what country we will be forced to invade first in the future, Canada or Mexico.

Insanity on both sides.

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right . . .

40 posted on 06/11/2003 7:45:54 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cherry_bomb88; breakem
I guess next animals will be able to wed and have the same benefits as traditional married couples.

Re #29-30:

Can you believe it ??:

Dogs marry in Connecticut


DERBY, Conn. - Call it puppy love.

Two dogs - Tatiana Anjelica and Tyson Beckford Spak - exchanged vows and slobbery kisses Sunday on the Derby Green. The bride even wore a little garter, slipped over her paw.

The bridegroom wore a top hat and tuxedo.

Excerpted. Click link for full article.
Excerpted - click for full article ^
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6699-2003Jun3.html



ROFL !!

41 posted on 06/11/2003 8:00:37 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Psychiatric Association Debates Lifting Pedophilia Taboo

Whoa ! (The second link)

Thanks for the links.

Excerpt:


(CNSNews.com) - In a step critics charge could result in decriminalizing sexual contact between adults and children, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) recently sponsored a symposium in which participants discussed the removal of pedophilia from an upcoming edition of the psychiatric manual of mental disorders.

Psychiatrists attending an annual APA convention May 19 in San Francisco proposed removing several long-recognized categories of mental illness - including pedophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism and sadomasochism - from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).


42 posted on 06/11/2003 8:31:34 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I wish the new (old) couple the best.
43 posted on 06/11/2003 8:35:08 AM PDT by Qwerty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry_bomb88
Thanks for clarifying that Cherry_bomb88!
44 posted on 06/11/2003 8:43:47 AM PDT by IvanT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cherry_bomb88
Amen!
45 posted on 06/11/2003 8:56:00 AM PDT by tame (If I must be the victim of a criminal, please let it be Catwoman! Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lindsay
l just looked at a poll in the Toronto newspaper The National Post, 80% of Canadians are against this change in law.

it wasn't in the newspaper, it was a non-scientific poll on their website. are you trying to be deceptive or are you just dim?

the AP story reports: "opinion polls indicate a slight majority of Canadians favor legalizing same-sex marriages"

46 posted on 06/11/2003 9:22:12 AM PDT by jethropalerobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
ROTFL...you are too much, meekie!
47 posted on 06/11/2003 10:39:03 AM PDT by cherry_bomb88 (Are you on the right side of the wrong issue or the wrong side of the right issue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
after pet cemetaries, could marraiges be far behind?
48 posted on 06/11/2003 10:47:23 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
touche
49 posted on 06/11/2003 10:47:42 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cherry_bomb88
:O)
50 posted on 06/11/2003 10:56:39 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson