Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHAT WENT WRONG AT COLUMBINE (MASSIVE COVER-UP ACCUSATION)
NewsWithViews.com ^ | June 12, 2003 | Larry Pratt

Posted on 06/12/2003 6:36:52 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay

Brian Rohrbough is the father of one of the victims at Columbine. In an interview I conducted with him for my talk show Live Fire, my listeners were informed of the continuing lawsuits pursued by Rohrbough to pry the information from the authorities who have engaged in a massive cover-up.

The killers were well-known to the school and the police as very dangerous characters. After stealing equipment from a van, they were reported to have made death threats against a student. The Sheriff denied that any such report had been made, but unhappily for the Sheriff, the father had kept a copy of the report on the official form used for that purpose.

Rohrbough said that other death threats had been made, as well. The police had recovered from the killers pipe bombs which had been reported to them.

A year before Columbine, a search warrant was drawn up to search the house of the killers but was never executed. For two years the Sheriff's department denied that there had been a warrant. It has now been revealed in court that the cops were lying. Rohrbough suspects that one of the killers' parents was close to someone in the Sheriff's department.

One of the killers was being medicated on a psychotropic drug. There is a line at many of the county schools in the cafeteria where the drugs are handed out. The schools get $1000 per year from the federal government for handing out the drugs that the parents pay for.

The Sheriff's department covered up the records of the juvenile diversion program that the killers had attended. The parents had described in documents for the program that the kids were angry. One of the killers answered questions on a form saying that he wanted to kill someone, wanted to kill himself and hurt as many people as possible. They wrote essays in a creative writing class where they described the joys of murdering innocent people. The only negative comment by the teacher who graded the paper was that you should not swear at people before murdering them.

In a class they produced a video depicting the blowing up of the school. The killers had been on the internet bragging about the bombs they built. They even put their names on the bombs.

Other video tapes were made by the killers bragging that they wanted to kill as many people as possible. They had a hit list, but that has not been released yet -- although Rohrbough is trying to get it in produced in court.

The school authorities reported concerns about the killers to the Sheriff department's school resource officer. The officer denied that he was ever told that information. This is one of the many lies that Rohrbough has uncovered in the over 30,000 pages of documents he has gotten out of the clutches of the authorities.

Rohrbough accuses the police of having been cowards. Most of the officers he hastens to add wanted to go in, but the first officers on the scene became cowards. They had a gun fight with the killers and ran to hide behind their cars instead of running into the school. Their cowardice soon became the orders from above, ultimately from the Sheriff himself.

There was about seven minutes before the killers killed anyone inside the school (two had been killed outside, including Rohrbough's son). Obviously, if the officers had gone into the building immediately, there is a great likelihood that many lives could have been saved.

It is now known that the police waited for three hours after they knew the killers were dead before they finally entered the building. This was the time during which a teacher bled to death in plain sight of the world.

Rohrbough has alleged that the county lied about 28 material facts. When he presented this in a case against the county, the judge said that the government is immune from criminal penalties when it lies. The county's defense, when they were caught lying, was to hide behind the doctrine of sovereign immunity which protects bureaucrats from liability for their misdeeds. As a result, they actually argued in court that they were not responsible for protecting the victims or the dying teacher.

As a result, Rohrbough's litigation has focused on freedom of information suits to obtain the documents which have exposed the government's lies.

The Governor's commission to investigate Columbine was on the verge of issuing a report saying that everyone in authority had done all they could when Rohrbough dug up the non-executed search warrant. The commission never did hammer the police for allowing two killers to roam the halls while the cops cowered outside.

The commission recommended two improvements. One was to improve communication technology between police departments and the Sheriff's office in the county. But Rohrbough has learned that the difficulty was solved almost instantly. The other recommendation was that troubled students not go to their diversion programs in the same car. That was all the commission could come up with!

Rohrbough lamented that there were no teachers or other adults with a concealed firearm in the school. He pointed to the case of Israel where teachers have been encouraged to arm themselves. Certainly, if the police are going to insist that they have no responsibility to protect victims from criminals, then it is unconscionable for the police and politicians to oppose people protecting themselves, including legalizing firearms for self defense in schools.

Rohrbough is of the opinion that the killers' accomplice who legally bought the guns for the killers had advance knowledge of the crime. According to her, she told the killers when she gave them the guns, "You're not going to do anything stupid, are you?" She was not prosecuted for transferring firearms to persons ineligible to own them. Rohrbough suspects that she was not prosecuted because she played the politically correct game of testifying that if there had been a gun show background check she never would have bought the guns.

One good thing that has resulted from the revelations of official misconduct was the defeat of the Sheriff in the next election.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Larry Pratt has been Executive Director of Gun Owners of America for 27 years. GOA is a national membership organization of 300,000 Americans dedicated to promoting their second amendment freedom to keep and bear arms.

The GOA web site is: http://gunowners.org. Pratt's weekly talk show Live Fire is archived there at: http://gunowners.org/radio.htm E-Mail: ldpratt@gunowners.org

Pratt has appeared on numerous national radio and TV programs such as NBC's Today Show, CBS' Good Morning America, CNN's Crossfire and Larry King Live, Fox's Hannity & Colmes, MSNBC's Phil Donahue show and many others. He has debated Congressmen James Traficant, Jr. (D-OH), Charles Rangel (D-NY), Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY), Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), and Vice President Al Gore, among others. His columns have appeared in newspapers across the country.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: co; colorado; columbine; coverup; donutwatch; ritalin; rohrbough; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last
California Governor
Promises Increased
School Safety

Poncho Magazine (script with picture on link)

1 posted on 06/12/2003 6:36:52 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I figure the CA school system will crap out soon enough. My kids go to private school here.
2 posted on 06/12/2003 6:49:57 AM PDT by donmeaker (Safety is NO Accident!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I never could understand why there were no cops brave enough to save these children. I hope this guy get media and the truth gets a chance here. I never did think it was a Video game that caused this.
3 posted on 06/12/2003 6:52:18 AM PDT by Afronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
...the judge said that the government is immune from criminal penalties when it lies...

4 posted on 06/12/2003 7:06:26 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
In my mind, what when wrong at Columbine can be answered by asking why didn't the parents of the slain students sue the school system, specifically the local chapter of the NEA?

Consider what the NEA asserts, regarding the roles and responsibilities of teachers and parents over our children (in areas such as sovereingty, authority & responsibility, morality, sexuality, etc). Furthermore, Colorado did not have vouchers or some other means of school choice (meaning private school) in place at the time of the Columbine shootings. Homeschooling was permitted, but under the authority of the State. Quoting from Jefferson County Public School policy (Columbine is in this school system) regarding truancy and school attendance,

"[the parent has an] obligation to insure that all children of compulsory attendance age attend school."

You'd think the parents would have sued the school board, the school, or individual teachers, as the public school system claims sovereignty over Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris' upbringing over the greater portion (i.e. school hours) of their day.

5 posted on 06/12/2003 7:07:23 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Athanasius contra mundum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
How did Michael Moore miss all this?

Too much hanging out at the bowling alley I guess.

6 posted on 06/12/2003 7:14:03 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
"They had a gun fight with the killers and ran to hide behind their cars instead of running into the school. "


Monday morning quarter backing by people who do not know SWAT tactics or the dangers faced by such a situation.
7 posted on 06/12/2003 7:22:53 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
It's good to know that cowering behind police cars while children die is official policy. Such brave public servants we have 'protecting' us.

Perhaps someone should have told the cops on the scene that there were donuts inside.

8 posted on 06/12/2003 7:37:06 AM PDT by zeugma (Hate pop-up ads? Here's the fix: http://www.mozilla.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
the judge said that the government is immune from criminal penalties when it lies...

YOU GOT IT! You win a FREE copy of Hillary's new book!(shipping and handling not included..offer may end at the discretion of this poster).

9 posted on 06/12/2003 7:38:36 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
So why do we pay SWAT guys for training and buy them all that armor and those toys if they wait 3 hours to enter a situation? Even a lay person can see something was not right at Columbine.
10 posted on 06/12/2003 7:42:52 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
The police in Columbine are permanently disgraced as a bunch of cowards, one and all. I have no way of knowing if the charges made above are true, but I wouldn't put it passed the cowards in that department to cover up their own incompetence.
11 posted on 06/12/2003 7:46:14 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
The great success of SWAT tactics (none) at Columbine is the foundation of your credibility (none).
12 posted on 06/12/2003 7:46:22 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
YO! There's a 2-for-1 sale at Krispy-Kreme!

Buh-bye.
13 posted on 06/12/2003 8:03:07 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Monday morning quarter backing by people who do not know SWAT tactics or the dangers faced by such a situation.

7 posted on 06/12/2003 7:22 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]





So what you are saying is that unless there is an innocent person that they can shoot in the face (FBI-Virginia) Or a Lady Carrying a baby to shoot in the head(Ruby Ridge) or a old man at a wrong address they can wake up in the middle of the night and fill full of holes and stomp his pet to death, or an innocent Security Guard (Richard Jewell) you can wrongfully arrest and smear in the press, or a car that has a dog in it you can unload your sidearm on (Tennessee) they hang out at the local Crispy Creme and practice procedures and when the Sh!t hits the fan they hide behind cars?

Sounds about right...

BOO
14 posted on 06/12/2003 8:32:46 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
In my mind, what when wrong at Columbine can be answered by asking why didn't the parents of the slain students sue the school system, specifically the local chapter of the NEA?

Because suing them would have been pointless.

Even if everything you suggested had been in place on April 20, 1999, twelve students and a teacher would still be dead.

Fact is, a very compelling argument has been made that not only did Harris and Klebold plan this shooting up to a year in advance, the relevant LEOs knew something was going to go down. That they did nothing is just grossly irresponsible and they should be held accountable.

15 posted on 06/12/2003 8:37:10 AM PDT by Houmatt (Real conservatives don't defend kiddy porn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Cops need to be smart during gun fights regardless of who's being killed. Being stupid (like running into an unknown building containing an unknown number of armed assailants in unknown positions) and getting themselves killed wouldn't have saved the life of a single child.
16 posted on 06/12/2003 8:42:48 AM PDT by discostu (If he really thinks we're the devil, then lets send him to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
That or hanging around too much at the nearest all-you-can-eat cafeteria.
17 posted on 06/12/2003 8:47:27 AM PDT by Corporate Law (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: discostu
You're right. It's much safer (for the cops) to cower behind their cars. In typical jack-boot fashion they are cowards who are too concerned about their own precious hides to put down their donuts and do the job they are paid to do. This is what you get when you let schoolyard bullies have guns and a badge when they (allegedly) grow up.
18 posted on 06/12/2003 8:50:41 AM PDT by zeugma (Hate pop-up ads? Here's the fix: http://www.mozilla.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: discostu
True. But there was very little running by ANY of the cops that showed up at Columbine that day. Even the SWAT team members, as they arrived separately and in groups, stayed outside the building, fully armed and armored, while the carnage was continuing inside.

Those men were trained and equipped to handle situations like this, and they did NOTHING. The number of assailants might have been unknown, but the fact there students were being murdered inside WAS known. Do we pay our police to protect the public (at large, in general) only when they have superior numbers, superior firepower, and no chance of injury?

Wether this was due to cowardice or policy varies from officer to officer, as several officers stated that they were ready and willing to enter the building, but were told to stay outside.

All in all, though, it was a catastrophic failure in both intercepting known agitants and ending the carnage. If C&H had not taken their own lives, I don't doubt that the killing would have continued, unabated.
19 posted on 06/12/2003 8:50:55 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
And how many lives would have been saved by them rushing in blind and getting blown away?
20 posted on 06/12/2003 8:59:50 AM PDT by discostu (If he really thinks we're the devil, then lets send him to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson