Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldiers forced to buy private treatment for war injuries
Electronic Telegraph ^ | June 16, 2003 | Sean Rayment

Posted on 06/14/2003 6:21:17 PM PDT by gcruse

Soldiers forced to buy private treatment for war injuries
By Sean Rayment, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 15/06/2003)

British troops injured in war are being forced to pay for private medical treatment or face long delays for operations on the National Health Service.

A staffing crisis in the Defence Medical Services (DMS) means that more than 10,000 soldiers - the equivalent of 15 infantry battalions - are currently not fit for frontline duty. That figure rises to more than 17,000 when all three services are taken into consideration, according to Government figures given to the Liberal Democrats.

Senior officers have told ministers that unless they receive an emergency injection of cash, large sections of the Army will be declared unoperational because of the number of troops waiting for surgery.

One soldier, who was injured on active duty in Afghanistan, has now been told that he faces a 12-month wait for a knee operation unless he is prepared to pay £2,000 for private treatment.

Another soldier who recently returned from Afghanistan after serving with the International Stabilisation and Assistance Force (Isaf) has been told that he will have to wait six months before he can see a specialist about his damaged ankle.

He may then face a further year's wait for an operation. He has, however, been advised that if he were to go private, he could see a specialist immediately and have the operation within three weeks.

The soldiers asked not to be named because military personnel are not allowed to speak to the press without authorisation.

The Ministry of Defence has spent more than £5 million on private health care in the last few years to reduce the number of servicemen and women waiting for operations. However, only a fixed amount of money is available to each unit, and commanding officers are being forced to ration the private treatment.

Service personnel whose injury prevents them from carrying out their duties are classified as "medically downgraded". These troops cannot be deployed on military operations and are unlikely to be able to undertake courses which have any physical element.

They can have their pay reduced and may be passed over for promotion until fully fit. A sergeant in the RAF wrote to his service's newspaper, the RAF News, saying he was faced with the choice of paying for a private operation or being unable to perform his duties for a year and a half.

"I have been medically downgraded for the first time in 18 years' service. Although it is temporary, I nevertheless cannot be deployed and I have limitations imposed on my normal duties.

"I find this whole situation unacceptable and as a result I have decided to pay for private treatment."

Soldiers claim that waiting up to a year for NHS treatment would deny them active service or promotion.

It is thought to be the first time in British history that troops are having to pay for surgery for injuries sustained during military service.

Officers are further pointing to the fact that numbers will increase dramatically in the aftermath of the war in Iraq.

Bernard Jenkin, the Tory shadow defence secretary, described the situation as an outrage. "The fact that our servicemen and women are having to pay for medical treatment is nothing short of a national scandal.

"Troops are meant to get priority treatment on the NHS. On Monday I will be demanding a statement from the Government asking why the MoD and the NHS are failing our soldiers." The DMS was meant to treat the Armed Forces after the nation's military hospitals were closed.

Senior officers claim that the crisis has been caused by bad morale, a lack of qualified medical staff and the effects of a savage cost-cutting programme undertaken in the mid-1990s which resulted in the closure of all military hospitals.

For non-emergency operations, soldiers now simply join NHS waiting lists.

A senior officer said this weekend: "How on earth are we meant to recruit for the Armed Forces when soldiers, sailors and airmen and women face the ridiculous possibility of having to pay for their own operations or spend months on a waiting list? It is a shocking and shameful state of affairs. There will be many servicemen and women returning from the Gulf carrying an injury which will get progressively worse and they will eventually need an operation but they will have to go on a waiting list.

"They then face the prospect of having to wait for up to 18 months and accept that their careers will stagnate - or pay for the operation themselves."

A spokesman for the MoD said that it accepted that a problem existed with troops facing long waiting times for surgery. He said a fast-track process was in place for units about to deploy on active operations.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/14/2003 6:21:17 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Socialists.
2 posted on 06/14/2003 6:25:00 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; MadIvan
SHAME!
3 posted on 06/14/2003 6:29:09 PM PDT by LibKill (MOAB, the greatest advance in Foreign Relations since the cat-o'-nine-tails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Hillery plans this for American troops.
4 posted on 06/14/2003 6:29:39 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
I wouldn't be surprised to find that the US Congress has its own hospital already.
5 posted on 06/14/2003 6:32:36 PM PDT by gcruse (Superstition is a mind in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Yeah, it's called Bethesda.
6 posted on 06/14/2003 6:39:09 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Makes you just want to turn over all medical care to the government, doesn't it? NO WAY!
7 posted on 06/14/2003 6:45:45 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The Royal family should pick up the tab; it might do wonders for their public image!
8 posted on 06/14/2003 7:08:11 PM PDT by AngrySpud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
This is not unique to veterans in the United States. The same is happening here in different ways. Certain specialties such as urologists are in short supply and taking months to check out possible cancers and tumors in the urinary tract. Heart problems are in the same fix. You don't need to go to England to find problems with government health care. We have a better health care system than England because our government has not gotten involved as much as England.

This alone shows that government involvement usually results in poorer care rather than better. I remember the conditions before medicare and the access and costs involved were much better at that time. The improvement in the technology has been much greater but this could have been accomplished in the grant and research system without controlling the rest of the medical system.

9 posted on 06/14/2003 7:32:16 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
What a disgrace.
10 posted on 06/14/2003 7:49:27 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
The corporations on behalf of whom this war was fought should pick up the tab.
11 posted on 06/14/2003 7:50:24 PM PDT by droberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marron
uh. its not their health system thats at fault here, its the military one. we have one too here.
12 posted on 06/14/2003 7:54:10 PM PDT by Emma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Emma
its not their health system thats at fault here, its the military one.

Maybe. The article says they are having to wait for the National Health Service, which is their regular civilian medical system. I am not taking a shot at their civilian system per se, but that the fact that if they have a military system, it is clearly underfunded if the guys are being shuffled off to the civilian system, and then being told that war casualties must take their turn, first come first serve, among the other hospital clients... its disgraceful.

While our VA hospital system certainly wins no prizes, our system for caring for military casualties fresh from the battlefield is, as far as I know, quite good.

13 posted on 06/14/2003 9:22:45 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Emma; gcruse
"and the effects of a savage cost-cutting programme undertaken in the mid-1990s which resulted in the closure of all military hospitals."

Ah, there it is, they don't even have military hospitals at all. Anyway, my shot at socialists isn't simply at their crummy medical system, but at the fact that, being socialists, they have underfunded their military to the point that the blokes have to pay for their own war injuries. Do they have to put up the bus fare to the front as well?
14 posted on 06/14/2003 9:28:00 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marron
In Canada, STDs are becoming such a problem that there is a move afoot to push STD cases to the front of the line for treatment.  That means resources will have to be pulled from less threatening areas to bring them to concentrate on handling STDs immediately.

Think of it as a soccer game.  The ball is over in the corner so everybody runs over to the corner, deserting the rest of the field.  Every crisis results in everyone running over to the new soccer ball.  Resources are not only strrained, but are being, in effect, triaged.  Then something like SARS comes in, and it's game over.

If the UK can't even rush their military wounded to the front of the line, they are nearing the collapse point of the system.
15 posted on 06/14/2003 9:37:46 PM PDT by gcruse (Superstition is a mind in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marron
I guess I just misunderstood when they said "A staffing crisis in the Defence Medical Services (DMS)". don't know what that means if they say the don't have military hospitals. prob tha t people get bumped into the NHS. and if they don't like that can choose the capitalist health system.
16 posted on 06/15/2003 9:19:31 AM PDT by Emma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
A PREVIEW OF HILLARY-CARE.
17 posted on 06/15/2003 9:31:56 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson