Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHINA: THE BEST FRIEND OF ASIA'S DICTATORS
Jamestown Foundation ^ | June 17, 2003 | Al Santoli

Posted on 06/17/2003 1:35:06 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Superficially, the May 30 mob violence and the detention in Burma of Aung San Suu Kyi, Asia's revered champion of democracy, appears to be a case of business-as-usual by one of the world's most reviled military juntas--a group that, for over a decade, has maintained a state of war against its population. However, the site of the incident, which occurred near the historic city of Mandalay, now largely controlled by ethnic Chinese, is symbolic of a larger strategic trend in the region. The military junta has little support among ethnic Burmese and the numerous tribal peoples in the rural areas. However, the brutal generals have held on to power since the 1989 national election--which was won overwhelmingly by Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy party--thanks to military support from the region's most powerful non-democratic power, the People's Republic of China.

The Chinese communist leadership has forged aggressive military and political alliances in support of dictatorships along its border areas, from Pakistan to Burma to Laos and Cambodia to North Korea. Indicative of this support was the emergency shipment of military supplies to Cambodian dictator (and former Khmer Rouge officer) Hun Sen at the time of the 1998 pro-democracy movement in Cambodia. These supplies came at a critical juncture, after Cambodians in Phnom Penh had protested a second national election that was stolen by Hun Sen and his political cronies.

For Beijing, the strategic aim of these alliances is, at one and the same time, to prevent the emergence of any sort of democratic movement in neighboring countries that might influence or empower democratic movements inside of China, and to encircle India, its principle rival in the region. A third objective is to prevent the United States from gaining any additional footholds or setting up any new bases in the region. These could be used to contain the expanding reach of the Chinese military, as well as to pressure America's allies in the region.

Since 1999, Chinese military advisory teams in Burma have overseen air-land-sea-communications exercises carried out by forces of the SLORC [or SPDC] military junta. These exercises have taken place along the coast of the Andaman Sea and the Bay of Bengal, some 300 nautical miles from India, and within 450 miles of the strategic Straits of Malacca. In these exercises, such as those that occurred in August 2000, the PLA teams were joined by observers from the military of Pakistan, which, along with China, supplies fighter aircraft and other military supplies to Burma. These exercises have demonstrated not only the significant progress that the PLA has made in its hi-tech military modernization program, but also Beijing's success in consolidating alliances with non-democratic anti-Western nations along its massive border, from Central Asia to the Pacific.

In addition, the Chinese media has openly published a description of the PLA's warship patrols and the ultra-modern network of "fortresses of the sea" being built in the Spratley Islands, which are contested by neighboring countries. Burma's geographical location is adjacent to the Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean, as well as to the Strait of Malacca, the most vital maritime "choke point" in all Asia. The asymmetrical multi-dimensional capability posed by the Beijing-Islamabad-SLORC alliance threatens Asian democracies, such as India, Thailand and the Philippines.

Covert PLA efforts aimed at fostering regional instability are further demonstrated by the PLA's direct or indirect support for military aggression, terrorism and narcotics trafficking across southeast Asia. Thailand's main national security threat at present is the rapid expansion of meth-amphetamine narcotics trafficking by the PLA-backed 25,000-strong Wa tribal army[UWSA] in Burma. The UWSA is expanding trafficking routes to the central and southern Burma-Thai border with the support of the SLORC. In addition, the Wa have moved army members to the border with India, where they are trafficking in PLA weapons with rebel tribal groups, such as the Nagas.

Beijing is conducting a "double-edged" diplomatic strategy to further its strategic goals in the region. This is demonstrated in China's political/military pursuit of control over the South China Sea. When pressured internationally, Beijing has used negotiation tactics to keep neighboring governments hopeful of peaceful compromise while the PLA continues its determined military build-up of permanent "fortresses" in the Spratley Islands. Regional security experts believe that Beijing is determined to have a long term presence on Burma's strategic waterways to the Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean, for both economic and strategic purposes. There are numerous reports of increasing numbers of Chinese migrants and security personnel, who now dominate the banks of the strategic Irrawaddy and Salween Rivers.

In maintaining military alliances intended to intimidate regional democracies, Beijing feels most comfortable with non-democratic regimes as allies. The Burmese junta's intelligence chief, General Khin Nyunt, is Beijing's closest Burmese ally. Nyunt is dependent on the Wa and the drug trade in his campaign to succeed General Tan Shwe as junta supreme leader. He is challenged by political rivals who are not as close to Beijing or the Wa. In addition, the Wa army, which was formerly the militant arm of the Beijing-backed Burmese Communist Party, has been commanded by Han Chinese PLA military officers since the 1950s.

In addition, and as is reflected in Beijing's military partnership with Pakistan (the creator and still the chief weapons supplier of--and military advisor to--the Taliban), Beijing seeks to keep narcotics and Muslim fundamentalism from entering its territory. But it does this while tolerating campaigns by fanatics of just this sort aimed at destabilizing or terrorizing rival nations. A serious development in this context is the growing presence of al Qaeda-related Muslim insurgents on the Thai-Burma border, in areas that have been taken over by the PLA-backed Wa drug armies. New militant Islamist communities are being reported near both Mae Aey District, of Thailand's Chiang Mai province, and Maesod, in Thailand's Tak Province. This radical network is spreading south methodically along the Thai border, heading toward indigenous Muslim areas in the Malay Peninsula where increasing incidents of violence are being reported.

Beijing's support of such tyrannical Asian regimes as Hun Sen in Cambodia and the junta in Burma, which is aimed at persecuting democratic reformers like Aung San Suu Kyi, has a clear strategic goal. The mid- to long-term effect of Beijing's increasing military, political and economic prowess could be the creation of a situation in which the United States is left without stable or reliable allies in this vital region, which is essential to America and to the economic stability and national security of its Asian allies.

It is imperative that the United States develop a comprehensive Asia -Pacific security policy. It should include:

1. An effort to support and strengthen democratic movements that might replace dictatorial regimes such as those in Burma, Cambodia and Pakistan. An important first step is to secure the safety and freedom of Aung San Suu Kyi and other leaders of her National League for Democracy . This must include political pressure on countries that have been providing military assistance to the junta, such as China and Pakistan.

2. The provision of humanitarian and other forms of assistance to U.S. allies, such as the Thai military and counter-narcotics police, as well as to indigenous forces in Burma. The aim is to defeat narcotics traffickers and terrorists such as the Wa and the al Qaeda elements along the Burma-Thai border and the India-Burma border.

3. Actions to encourage and strengthen political openness, and also pro-freedom and democratic groups within China.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aungsansuukyi; hegemony; spratlyislands

1 posted on 06/17/2003 1:35:07 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
China.... member of the Trans-Eurasian AXIS. We must stop them.
2 posted on 06/17/2003 2:12:56 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; RusIvan; RussianConservative; Orion78; Jeff Head; swarthyguy; Paul Ross; ...
The Axis is indeed Evil and must be destroyed. Only unconditional surrender will suffice. No more Kissingerian truces, armistices, draws, withdrawals or detente. There is no other way.
3 posted on 06/17/2003 2:15:43 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I must emphasize something here. Beijing wouldn't pose such a threat in Southeast Asia if it weren't for the corrupt ethnic Chinese elites of the region who wield enormous financial clout and have extended their tentacles deep into the pockets of local officials. Burma is only an extreme case of how the Chinese are slowly pulling Southeast Asia into their orbit. Nowhere in the world is the nexus between legitimate enterprise, organized crime, and various forms of terrorism as well-established as it is in the Chinese-dominated zones of Southeast Asia. And the Chicoms are definitely pulling the strings. Their biggest pieces in this chess game are untouchable - the Li Kashing's, Stanley Ho's, Robert Kwok's, and other commercial magnates who bring an aura of respectability to their dealings with the West, yet have acquired a huge stake in the most extensive network of underground activities in human history. We're not going to win this war unconditionally, for the simple reason that we're not going to fight it unconditionally.
4 posted on 06/17/2003 4:18:02 PM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
Will you be first over the top? Better be since you cheer lead for mass destruction and war.
5 posted on 06/17/2003 6:40:48 PM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Thaksin Shinawatra, Prime Minister of Thailand as well as telecom magnate.... non Siamized, real surname? SHIN..... any questions?
6 posted on 06/18/2003 8:13:39 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
I'll be the first in your face. And by the way, you make many assumptions regarding my travel history in the "formerly Communist" parts of the world. Don't assume....
7 posted on 06/18/2003 8:15:12 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
What ever. Like I said, I see no reason continue conversation...you live in fantasy world, I don't.
8 posted on 06/18/2003 8:27:02 AM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Is the Axis treaty of 7/16/2001 a fantasy? How about all of the overt military assitance to the PRC? A fantasy as well? Tell me about some more so called fantasies....
9 posted on 06/18/2003 10:23:24 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Paul Ross; Noswad; Orion78; swarthyguy; DarkWaters
FYI.
10 posted on 06/18/2003 10:24:51 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
Last time I tells you, I not talking to people who not get over Cold War and have some fetish for it and lives in fantasy world or you not understand english?
11 posted on 06/18/2003 11:30:05 AM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All; RussianConservative; HighRoadToChina
Harsh reality.... not fantasy...
12 posted on 06/18/2003 12:08:48 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
An Axis is forming... indeed, unconditional total war is the only way to stop it.
13 posted on 06/18/2003 12:12:42 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
An Axis is forming... indeed, unconditional total war is the only way to stop it.

OK, outline what you think would be the BEST way for the US to engage in said war.

14 posted on 06/18/2003 12:16:05 PM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
No more Kissingerian truces, armistices, draws, withdrawals or detente. There is no other way. ++

Kissenger truces and anything was policy of reality the alternative was nuclier annihilation. Why Cold war didn't become Hot? Today there is same alternative.

You better engage on american corporations which trade with China. If China will not have US dollars then it will not have russian arms anymore.
15 posted on 06/18/2003 1:37:51 PM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
You're getting carried away. Russia and China are more likely to go to war with each other than either of them are with us. I've been to both Siberia and northeast China and from what I saw and heard, it's hard to believe there's a genuine alliance forming between them. All they can agree on is the need to restrain US power. If it weren't for our superpower status and our prosecution of wars without UN approval there'd be no substance to the Sino-Russian axis whatsoever.

It all boils down to the fact that the costs of confronting Russia and China are far too great to ditch diplomacy. We simply don't have the capability to invade either country or penetrate their airspace with anything close to the level of immunity we've grown accustomed to. Total war against the heads of the Axis sounds nice, until you start considering how many lives it will cost. I'll start taking your suggestion seriously if you're the first to volunteer on a march to Beijing and Moscow.
16 posted on 06/18/2003 7:40:38 PM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
We might want to start in Central/South America. The Chicomms have not so quietly developed some very dangerous footholds in our hemisphere...thanks, of course, to RATS amongst us.
17 posted on 06/18/2003 7:44:17 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution ("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
An Axis is forming... indeed, unconditional total war is the only way to stop it.

OK, oh wannabe Clausewitz...how do you propose that the US fight this war?

18 posted on 06/19/2003 5:18:28 AM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
A good start might consist of renewing SEATO and rearming ourselves to handle more than 2 MRC. Also, our wunderkinder inside the beltway need to learn where the Strait of Malacca is on the world map.....
19 posted on 06/19/2003 11:24:40 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
If China will not have US dollars then it will not have russian arms anymore

Hey, what's that 800 pund gorilla doing here? Ah, ignore him!

20 posted on 06/19/2003 11:26:35 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
I totally agree. Those who currently pass themselves off as "strategists" have utterly blundered in the Americas. It was a sin that we have not been more supportive of those who oppose Chavez and instead have labelled one of them as a "terrorist." Mr. Nice Guy needs to exit stage left.....
21 posted on 06/19/2003 11:27:08 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Start out be putting SEATO back together. Rearm and staff up to handle 4 - 5 MRC. Get serious about NMD and CD.
22 posted on 06/19/2003 11:28:07 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
You said "unconditional, total war" was the only solution.

Your proposals ain't even close to that. Try again.

23 posted on 06/19/2003 12:10:02 PM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
As far as I'm concerned, it's the Giant White Elephant in the room that NO ONE in this administration seems to want to deal with.
24 posted on 06/19/2003 11:10:48 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution ("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson