Hillary Clinton Attacks Bush,U.S. - Urges a "Globalized and Integrated World"

U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton (D NY) has attacked U.S. President George W. Bush, and questioned U.S. intelligence effectiveness in an interview published in the online version of the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel.

Der Spiegel is Germany's leading newsmagazine, and is highly regarded throughout Europe. Clinton's remarks will gain a high degree of publicity across the European continent, attracting support within Europe's generally liberal political environment, where socialism enjoys wide acceptance.

While asserting her support for Bush in Afghanistan and Iraq, Sen. Clinton criticized present U.S. policy in Europe, and questioned the Bush administration's use of intelligence information.

Clinton stated that she was "not ready to answer 'yes'" to Der Spiegel's question whether misleading information was used to launch the war in Iraq.

"I know my husband received the same intelligence information [during his presidency as did Bush]." Clinton asserted that "the real question is have we obtained accurate information, or have the findings been altered for military or political purposes?"

Clinton also urged greater interdependence between Europe and the U.S., stating that America should seek "a secure and solid foundation" for relations with Europe, instead of "relying only upon our [U.S.] military strength."

Praising her husband's close relationship with European leaders during his period in office, Clinton declared that "for eight years we were on the right course to a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other."

Clinton publicly revealed the foreign policy thrust of the Democratic Party in a remarkable moment of candor, a position Democratic leaders have not made clear to the public, but which is keenly understood and supported by Clinton.

Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party.

According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."

In the Der Spiegel interview, Clinton asserted that her husband sought to pass "effective laws" and proposed "more money" to carry out the struggle against terror, but "the Republicans prevented" measures from becoming enacted.

Hillary Clinton, already considered an intriguing figure in Europe, will gain additional credibility as a stateswoman as a result of the Der Spiegel interview.

As Europeans become more familiar with Clinton and her views, their impact will be felt as they bring money and influence to her or a like politician's campaign.

The socialist European expectation will be that a Democratic victory will bring into power a U.S. government more to the liking of one-world European politicians.

we were on the right course to a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other.

It's the "other way" I greatly fear. Banishing all tribes is very much against our genetic programming. Unlike less genetically developed animals, humans are war makers, it's what human really means. The socialists want to banish tribes for two reasons: 1) socialism goes bankrupt when people can lower their taxes by moving away from it, and 2) they want to redirect military spending to vote buying. That might make sense academically but it is not a sustainable system in the real world, which is a very dangerous place. Hillary is one of the more dangerous people in it.

"a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other."

Globalization's not the problem, it's that "one way or the other" crap that's the problem.

When a globalize super government, with super constitutional respect for law and liberty, and super requirements for membership, and recognition that super states have super voting power is in the works, then call me a super globalist!

Just don’t try to impose this ten steps backward government of the UN on the foundation of freedom here and tell us it's progress, LOL!

Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party.

Reason # 1026 why we should NEVER vote democRAT.

According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."

Of course they haven't made it clear, they're trying to do it by stealth. If their REAL intentions were known, a demoncRAT wouldn't get elected dog-catcher.

Effective LAWS????!!! Like what!!! Oh yeah, like the time our embassy was blown up ..... No.... OK, what about the time the WTC was bombed in '93.....NO...not then either OK..OK...when the USS Cole was er..... No?, well it'll come to me....X42 must've done SOMETHING during 8 years.

Hillary Clinton, already considered an intriguing figure in Europe, will gain additional credibility as a stateswoman as a result of the Der Spiegel interview.

Well one thing, she let out her true agenda. Thank God for the Internet, even 10 years ago, most Americans wouldn't have had the chance to see an interview like this in a foreign magazine. We'd only see the carefully crafted statements she spouts off the the US news media. She may gain credibility over there but she has NO credibility over here (NY, and Calif not withstanding)

As Europeans become more familiar with Clinton and her views, their impact will be felt as they bring money and influence to her or a like politician's campaign.

And as Americans get more familiar with her true intentions hopefully this woman's political ambitions will be brought to a screaching halt. BTW, why should foreign governments want to donate to her political ambitions? Oh, I get it, they see how wildly successfull the Chi-coms were at buying influence in her husband's administration, so they want in on the ground floor.

The socialist European expectation will be that a Democratic victory will bring into power a U.S. government more to the liking of one-world European politicians.

That statement says it all. Liberals, led by the Clintons MUST be defeated at every turn. Our country's future really depends on it. It's one thing when we say that here on FR, but it's quite another when the woman herself spells it out for you in a foreign magazine. She knows these ideas won't get her anywhere with the US citizenry, but she feels free to let her guard down overseas, knowing full well that her lap-dogs in the US press corps will let it pass.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.