Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah defies Saudi thugs, won't leave without kids!
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, June 20, 2003 | Pat Roush

Posted on 06/19/2003 11:45:45 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-169 next last
To: cinFLA
Is CCA2K retroactive, or in effect when the children were born? Few changes to the immigration laws are retro.
61 posted on 06/20/2003 4:35:07 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
I dated a lady of Indian (the country) descent that said she would never marry an Indian.

I married a Vietnamese lady that said she would never marry a Vietnamese.

It was a cultural thing; something about the roles of the husbands and wives...
62 posted on 06/20/2003 4:35:22 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
I know even countries like Greece, dual citizenship can have it's problems, and Greeks have told me that they were careful to renounce their Greek citizenship when obtaining US citizenship because that Greek citizenship can pass down to their US born children ----who are then eligible for the Greek draft and other responsibilities.

Women choosing to marry Middle Eastern men have to have a screw loose, no one should be so ignorant of the laws of Islamic countries when they marry an Islamic. Why do they believe they should make their decision and then when things don't work, our country is for some reason to get involved in their custody disputes. All international marriages have possible snags ---let the buyer beware.
63 posted on 06/20/2003 4:36:34 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Is CCA2K retroactive, or in effect when the children were born? Few changes to the immigration laws are retro.

It applies to all children under the age of 18.

64 posted on 06/20/2003 4:38:19 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
The children's temporary presence in the US can be required, if that's what you're referring to.
65 posted on 06/20/2003 4:39:38 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
I really don't think that the children's citizenship makes much difference here - the Saudis don't really care, they're the father's kids in Saudi eyes, and that's it. I very seriously doubt that they will ever be allowed to leave the country.

I agree. But lack of citizenship in this case makes the case moot.

66 posted on 06/20/2003 4:40:40 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
The children's temporary presence in the US can be required, if that's what you're referring to.

It is a VERY short act. Do I have to post it for you to get it correct?

67 posted on 06/20/2003 4:41:56 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
I dated a lady of Indian (the country) descent that said she would never marry an Indian.

I married a Vietnamese lady that said she would never marry a Vietnamese.

It was a cultural thing; something about the roles of the husbands and wives...

Sad that this woman had to get involved with an arab. If she had ANY information about their "culture", she would have never gone on a date with him!


68 posted on 06/20/2003 4:42:28 PM PDT by texson66 ("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
I'm sure there are children who are US citizens that haven't been allowed to leave Saudi, and many other countries.
69 posted on 06/20/2003 4:43:03 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Well, you could either make your point, or continue to be a richard cranium. Your choice.
70 posted on 06/20/2003 4:44:21 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
I'm sure there are children who are US citizens that haven't been allowed to leave Saudi, and many other countries.

Of course. But that was not what we were discussing. Twice you have posted that I was wrong. Do you retract?

71 posted on 06/20/2003 4:44:59 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
I have handled several divorces for Vietnamese. The men treat the women very badly by American standards. Both the husband and the wife work, typically two jobs. Then the husband expects the wife to treat him like a king at home.

If the wife says that in America, she doesn't have to do that, the husband goes back to Vietnam and marries a young Vietnamese girl who is anxious to get out, even to the point of marrying an old man just for his money. And he doesn't bother to get a divorce from the first wife first. He brings her back to America, then divorces the first wife.

The young, naive Vietnamese wife thinks she is really married, so when the cycle begins again, she isn't entitled to divorce benefits.
72 posted on 06/20/2003 4:46:30 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
As I said, you could either make your point, or continue to be a richard cranium. Your choice.
73 posted on 06/20/2003 4:46:47 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
"temporary" doesn't get it.
74 posted on 06/20/2003 4:47:13 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
This is going to sound really ugly, so don't read if you are easily offended.

The last Vietnamese divorce I handled, the husband told the wife that she had to do whatever he said, even if he told her to clean his (rear end) with her tongue! Pretty disgusting, no?

Thank God for American men!
75 posted on 06/20/2003 4:49:41 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
§322 (a) `(4) The child is residing outside of the United States in the legal and physical custody of the citizen parent, is temporarily present in the United States pursuant to a lawful admission, and is maintaining such lawful status.
76 posted on 06/20/2003 4:51:34 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This calls for Janet Reno.
77 posted on 06/20/2003 4:58:42 PM PDT by technochick99 (Self defense is a basic human right. http://www.2ASisters.org julib@2asisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Wouldn't doubt if some bureau approved and encouraged these types of forays abroad to get a wife.
78 posted on 06/20/2003 5:19:25 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
As cover for sleeper cells, no doubt.....
79 posted on 06/20/2003 5:53:24 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Thank you. Now will you apologize for

1) Contradicting my post by stating "Of course they're US citizens".

2) For posting that I was wrong to state that foreign born children of American citizens are not automatically US citizens (especially as in this case where one parent is not a US citizen.)
80 posted on 06/20/2003 6:17:58 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson