Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Says Iraqi Weapons Sites Were Looted
Reuters ^ | June 21, 2003 | Randall Mikkelsen

Posted on 06/21/2003 3:19:07 PM PDT by Buckeroo

Edited on 06/29/2004 7:09:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush, trying again to explain the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, said on Saturday that suspected arms sites had been looted in the waning days of Saddam Hussein's rule.

"For more than a decade, Saddam Hussein went to great lengths to hide his weapons from the world. And in the regime's final days, documents and suspected weapons sites were looted and burned," Bush said in his weekly radio address.


(Excerpt) Read more at wireservice.wired.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: buckerooalert; looting; tuwaitha; wmd; yellowcake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-370 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2003 3:19:07 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
I hate when that happens.
2 posted on 06/21/2003 3:20:03 PM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
What happens?
3 posted on 06/21/2003 3:22:50 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
"Bush has been widely criticized for misleading the public ..."

Oh?

4 posted on 06/21/2003 3:27:11 PM PDT by The G Man (Hey CNN ... "NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
President Bush, trying again to explain the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq

KATHUNK!!!

In a related development, Randall Mikkelsen, author of this Reuters report, was injured as he fell from his chair due to his slanting this article so far to the left. Although he is expected to recover, physically; physicians would make no predictions on his mental condition.
5 posted on 06/21/2003 3:29:50 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
Ever think about how an American president has lied to the American people? I guess you are stuck with your (O) getting your backside reamed out.... and enjoying it because the government said it feels good.
6 posted on 06/21/2003 3:29:54 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Bush has been widely criticized for misleading the public by asserting that Saddam had stockpiles of unconventional weapons that menaced the world.

It reads like a statement of fact, which it is not.

7 posted on 06/21/2003 3:30:03 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Bush has been widely criticized for misleading the public by asserting that Saddam had stockpiles of unconventional weapons that menaced the world.

If Bush mislead the public then so did Clinton and Gore, numerous Democrats, the United Nations security council, UN inspectors, and intelligence agencies of the UK, Germany and many other nations, and Iraqi defectors ALL of whom claimed Saddam has WMDs that were a threat to the his neigbors and the world.

This focusing only on Bush is disingenious and phoney...and mostly a tactic of hypocritical Bush haters who would bash him no matter what he did.

8 posted on 06/21/2003 3:30:46 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
True, but Bush needs to stop talking about this issue. Let the Dems and the media appear to harp on it. Talk about the successes in Iraq, stop talking about WMDs, it just fuels the attacks from the media and the Dems. Already, the Fox poll today shows the % of people who think the Iraq war was "worth it" drop from 63 to 54%. Lets move on.
9 posted on 06/21/2003 3:32:52 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Saddam is defeated, his empire scattered, and the powers of the middle east have seen the strongest Arab military crushed like a egg under the wheel of a semi. The full effect may not be apparent, but a major shift has taken place, and the world is a better place for it. Iran and Syria are now surrouned, and our will to strike when we percieve a threat has been established.

Yep, it feels good.

10 posted on 06/21/2003 3:36:20 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (The slow blade penetrates the shield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Where are the WMD? BTW, America under Reagan gave Hussein WMD during the 1980's .... but you don't care because the American government is excusable.
11 posted on 06/21/2003 3:37:19 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
As I said when Bill Clinton was elected the first time.

"Only the President (whoever he is) knows the real secret
history of the United States.
ONly HE is privy to the secret diplomacy of past Presidents."

We think we know a lot, and we get dribs and drabs as time goes on but we never know all of it. Some we will NEVER know.
12 posted on 06/21/2003 3:38:05 PM PDT by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"This focusing only on Bush is disingenious and phoney...and mostly a tactic of hypocritical Bush haters who would bash him no matter what he did."

Bad Bush. Winning the war was not enough - now he was supposed to have done it with style points. Gotta love the left - there is no situation they can't spin into heads we win, tails we win.

13 posted on 06/21/2003 3:40:00 PM PDT by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

"If Bush mislead the public then so did Clinton and Gore, numerous Democrats, the United Nations security council, UN inspectors, and intelligence agencies of the UK, Germany and many other nations, and Iraqi defectors ALL of whom claimed Saddam has WMDs that were a threat to the his neigbors and the world. " -- Jorge

Ahh! The excuse for GWBush for everything he did because of the Democrats argument! Cool rationalization .... are you thinking of applying for a job in this administration?
14 posted on 06/21/2003 3:40:59 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Question should be,

Where did the WMD go?

or who did Saddam give them to?
15 posted on 06/21/2003 3:42:24 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tet68
There is a certain threshold in every society that a government can break and still retain the People's confidence. When a government goes beyond that threshold, that is, when the People start to criticize the government's actions, there are two ways to deal with the new issue about lack of confidence: bribe the People back to confidence (tax breaks) or crush the People in the street.

In either case, it is a sham about truth; in our free society here in America, truth is the beacon of our republic.


16 posted on 06/21/2003 3:43:21 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Why don't you clean up your own state before worrying about the entire country?
17 posted on 06/21/2003 3:47:31 PM PDT by lonestar (Don't mess with Texans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo

18 posted on 06/21/2003 3:48:03 PM PDT by b4its2late (Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo

19 posted on 06/21/2003 3:49:38 PM PDT by b4its2late (Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Where are the WMD?

I have no idea.

However, anyone concluding that Bush "misled the public" simply because to date, we have not yet been able to uncover them is being disingenuous and acting from a position that reeks of an agenda that is nothing but political.

Any number of scenarios are plausible as to why they have yet to be found, the least of which being that it was an intentional act at deception perpetrated by the Bush Administration.

20 posted on 06/21/2003 3:49:46 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Because the federal government has created this HELL about our state's rights and has ensured the loss of our personal dignity.

The lies that pop out of this federal government's mouth and your love for the illusion places you into a fine category.... 'sheeple.'
21 posted on 06/21/2003 3:50:26 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo

22 posted on 06/21/2003 3:50:45 PM PDT by b4its2late (Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Randall Mikkelsen -- Reuters America - Washington Bureau

Title: White House Correspondent
Department: Headquarters
E-mail: randall.mikkelsen@reuters.com
Phone: (202) 898-8392
Fax: (202) 898-8383
Address: 1333 H St NW, Washington, DC 20005
23 posted on 06/21/2003 3:52:29 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
LOL!
24 posted on 06/21/2003 3:52:37 PM PDT by wimpycat (Another great tagline coming soon! Brought to you by Acme Builders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Ahh! The excuse for GWBush for everything he did because of the Democrats argument

Are you being intentionally obtuse, or did you miss his point entirely?

Reread his Jorge's point -

If Bush mislead the public then so did Clinton and Gore, numerous Democrats, the United Nations security council, UN inspectors, and intelligence agencies of the UK, Germany and many other nations, and Iraqi defectors ALL of whom claimed Saddam has WMDs that were a threat to the his neigbors and the world.

This is correct. Everyone else has, at some point, come to the conclusion that Saddam had WMD in some form or another. If Bush was wrong, everyone else, including the vast majority of his current critics, was also wrong. The Democrats didn't make him do anything.

25 posted on 06/21/2003 3:54:10 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (The slow blade penetrates the shield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Exactly.

Too much evidence exists from the early 1990's through 1998 that Saddam had them. Before he kicked out the UN inspectors in 1998, he even admitted to a list of various chemical/biological substances he had. They didn't just evaporate. They exist--somewhere. If no longer in Iraq, then ????? [select country from our "not-true-friends" list]
26 posted on 06/21/2003 3:54:13 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Where are the WMD? BTW, America under Reagan gave Hussein WMD during the 1980's .... but you don't care because the American government is excusable.

Are you a liberal? You sure post like one....

27 posted on 06/21/2003 3:54:38 PM PDT by b4its2late (Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

"However, anyone concluding that Bush "misled the public" simply because to date, we have not yet been able to uncover them is being disingenuous and acting from a position that reeks of an agenda that is nothing but political. " -- hole_n_one

Where are the WMD, that GWBush pushed our nation into war about? Don't play some silly game about logic or proportion with me. Since there are no recovernable WMD in Iraq, what was the REAL reason for America to make war about a sovereign nation half-way around the world, that America already had under control for 12 years?
28 posted on 06/21/2003 3:56:42 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
I am an American, I believe in individual dignity and the constitutional guards against government to subject us to the scrutiny that government usurps, today. If you think I am a liberal, fine. I am a constitutionalist, however. And have no affiliation with these political parties of republican or democrat nature that have systemattically destroyed our once great and proud nation.
29 posted on 06/21/2003 4:00:01 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Because the federal government has created this HELL about our state's rights and has ensured the loss of our personal dignity.

Oh, so now it's Bush's fault that you allowed your legislature to overspend? Perhaps if you spent didn't spend so much time criticizing the FEDERAL government and instead spent your energy on cleaning up your STATE government we might be inclined to listen to you.

30 posted on 06/21/2003 4:00:08 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Where are the WMD, that GWBush pushed our nation into war about?

I already answered that question once before.......

I don't know.

31 posted on 06/21/2003 4:02:14 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
You better get to work on that web page.....


DeadConstitution.com

is in process, 11/03/2002 03:41:15 PM. I have quite a few scripts to write before this place is really on-line.  The good news, is that it is secure and FAST!

The web site shall be secure from and to your client machine, as well.


Please try DC later; you can try it anytime, of course!  I am estimating that the site will be fully up and running about  January, 2003.  Email me if required: bairdb@PacBell.net or buckeroo@deadconstitution.com (if you can read this web page or 'semblance, thereof, you can email me).  The servers shall be up and down in November/December, 2002 with great frequency..

DeadConstitution

If you have a sense of humor coupled with a passion for personal dignity and love about individual liberty, you may like this up and coming site.

  • Free internet email accounts - (no SPAM); already up and running; this minimizes folk's requirements about security for themselves and those that they intend to address.  
  • Automatic web-page updates concerned with individual liberty, freedom and rights ( article links from around the world, file pathed for easy look-up by geographical area and subject matter ); the "DCbot' shall continuously post relevant web-links upon the DC_Update web page; this should be up and running around November 13, 2002.  It actually works now; I am trying to minimize the number of "clicks" that are required to access the web-sites from your browser.
  • Bulletin Board access where freedom minded folks may discuss any relevant information about our individual liberties, freedoms and rights; this should be up and running January 1, 2003.
  • Authoritative authors with original synthesis about  issues that escaped the radar; should be up now!  Please email attachments of original work in the field of 'natural rights' or 'constitutional rights' or 'god-given rights', as you choose.

I wish some folks could help me upon this website.   I see a tremendous opportunity to spread the word about our God given and individual liberties.   Well, I have to get back to work and fix the place up!  See you next year in and about  January. 

 --   Buckeroo


32 posted on 06/21/2003 4:02:21 PM PDT by b4its2late (Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
America under Reagan gave Hussein WMD during the 1980's ....

This statement is completely false. Stop reading liberal mythology.

33 posted on 06/21/2003 4:04:02 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
I have a few links that you are not entitled to. That's just a dummy page. LOL
34 posted on 06/21/2003 4:04:20 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
This is correct. Everyone else has, at some point, come to the conclusion that Saddam had WMD in some form or another. If Bush was wrong, everyone else, including the vast majority of his current critics, was also wrong. The Democrats didn't make him do anything.

Thank you for responding to that post.
I don't know where he got the idea I was arguing the Dems made Bush do anything.

And as you said, the majority of Dems who are criticizing him now are hypocrites.

I am hoping the WMDs are found and these snakes reap the political reward they deserve....public humiliation.

35 posted on 06/21/2003 4:04:44 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
They are somewhere and they are either still hidden in Iraq or they are in the hands of Syria or as you say any number of anti-USA countries.

Bottom line is that Bush did the right thing in reguards to the War against Saddam. I do not agree with Bush on many things but on this subject and the on going war against the terrorist Bush has done a fantastic job.

The only place that I disagree with Bush about is our border question.

***please see***
COMING TO AMERICA Anarchy on our borders

Speech by Michelle Malkin gives prescription for immigration failures
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/932986/posts?page=


and Bush saying Islam is Peace and his kissing up to Islam. Period! As far as I am concerned the enemy in this war is very easy to name.
36 posted on 06/21/2003 4:09:12 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
The WMD issue is a non-issue. The majority of Americans would have supported the war just on the argument that Iraq harboured Al-Queda. The overriding mission, which has been accomplished, both in Iraq and A'stan, is that contrary to Arab belief, America, post-Vietnam, is not afraid to spill some blood to protect ourselves and the open and free society we have spent 200 years building. If these towel heads think (or thought) that we are going to tolerate 9/11, they will now think again. We will spill some of our blood, and lots of theirs. It's the only thing these people (extremists) respect - raw power. They thought we had grown soft - they were wrong.
37 posted on 06/21/2003 4:10:48 PM PDT by trickydick62 (no good deed goes unpunished. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
I have no idea about what you are talking about. During Reagan's administration, the good ol' USA gave WMD to Hussein in retaliation against Iran.

There were no deals. Saddam tested these WMD against the Kurds immediately during Reagan's watch.

38 posted on 06/21/2003 4:11:24 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
That's just a dummy page.

My thoughts exactly....

39 posted on 06/21/2003 4:13:31 PM PDT by b4its2late (Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
However, anyone concluding that Bush "misled the public" simply because to date, we have not yet been able to uncover them is being disingenuous and acting from a position that reeks of an agenda that is nothing but political

I don't care who was sitting in the Oval Office -- taking the country to war and getting American sons and daughters killed based on false and fabricated information on WMD is criminal. This goes well beyond politics. You had better damn sure have the evidence in your pocket before you invade and not freaking vague "they got em cause I say they got em" BS like we've been handed from day one on this.

Richard W.

40 posted on 06/21/2003 4:15:22 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: trickydick62

"The WMD issue is a non-issue." -- trickydick62

You must be an idiot. This whole American administration used the WMD reason as a means to garner war upon another sovereign nation. Iguess you forgot all the balleyhoo in front of Congress .... and the UN last year.

What a fool, you are.

41 posted on 06/21/2003 4:15:23 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
It is intended for folks like you that post it everywhere.
42 posted on 06/21/2003 4:16:48 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Since there are no recovernable WMD in Iraq,

You don't know that. All you know is nobody has found any stock piles YET.
They could be anywhere. He's been hiding them from UN inspectors for many years.

what was the REAL reason for America to make war about a sovereign nation half-way around the world, that America already had under control for 12 years?

Before the war..the Dems and others were complaining that Bush was giving TOO MANY REASONS for removing Saddam.

Including WMDs, the danger of Iraq's links with terrorist(training camps were found), and liberating the Iraqi people from Saddam's torture, murder and oppression.

Now the Bush bashers are denying any of the other reasons existed...and they are completely unmoved by the thousands of Iraqis being uncovered in mass graves.

They are so desperate to turn this great victory and magnificant act of goodness into something evil.

In any case..all GOOD PEOPLE are applauding Bush and Blair.

43 posted on 06/21/2003 4:17:34 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Apparently Reuters doesn't like inserting "allegedly" when it is a Republican:

"Bush has been widely criticized for misleading the public by asserting that Saddam had stockpiles of unconventional weapons that menaced the world."

There should be an allegedly before "misleading" for the sake of fairness and balance.

Then again, when did that matter to Reuters?
44 posted on 06/21/2003 4:18:44 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Man you are a prick. Can't you just go play with yourself and leave us alone?
45 posted on 06/21/2003 4:23:22 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Bush needs bashing, pal. He has not performed anything other lead our nation into further loss about our nation.

Where is OBL? Why has it cost Americans (not a government) to go after a boogeyman that has now created a police-like-state in America? Why is America committing our resources towards peace everywhere in the ME while making war?

You are a fool if you believe this administration is control of anything other than your pocketbook.
46 posted on 06/21/2003 4:24:57 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Sorry, but is simply isn't true. Check out Jim Dunnigan's Strategy Page.

Myths:

The United States armed Saddam. This one grew over time, but when Iraq was on it's weapons spending spree from 1972 (when its oil revenue quadrupled) to 1990, the purchases were quite public and listed over $40 billion worth of arms sales. Russia was the largest supplier, with $25 billion. The US was the smallest, with $200,000. A similar myth, that the U.S. provided Iraq with chemical and biological weapons is equally off base. Iraq requested Anthrax samples from the US government, as do nations the world over, for the purpose of developing animal and human vaccines for local versions of Anthrax. Nerve gas doesn't require technical help, it's a variant of common insecticides. European nations sold Iraq the equipment to make poison gas.

The U.S. created Saddam. Arab nationalism created Saddam. He neither asked, needed nor got any help from the United States as he rose to power in the Baath party. When he took over in 1979, he promptly went to war with Iran a year later. Even before that, public opinion, and public policy, regarding Saddam (the bloody minded head of the secret police) was negative. You can go read it in the contemporary papers. Despite most Americans feeling OK about Iran getting hammered by Iraq (because Iran had held our embassy staff hostage for over a year), there was no move to provide Iraq with weapons. When the Iraqis looked like they might fold, and Iran's then fearsome Islamic Jihad (against less observant Moslems, and mostly against America, the Great Satan) might spread, the U.S. provided Iraq with satellite photos of Iranian military positions. After that war ended in a draw in 1988, the U.S. believed Saddam's pronouncements that he had seen the light and would rein in his aggressive impulses.

Satellite photos, that was about the extent of it. France and Germany were far more responsible for the poison gas attacks against the Kurds than the U.S. was.

47 posted on 06/21/2003 4:26:00 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: arete
taking the country to war and getting American sons and daughters killed based on false and fabricated information on WMD is criminal.

I would agree.

Is that what has happened?

48 posted on 06/21/2003 4:28:04 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
He has not performed anything other lead our nation into further loss about our nation.

Can somebody please translate this for me?

Why has it cost Americans (not a government) to go after a boogeyman that has now created a police-like-state in America?

Oh no.. Here comes the "police state". Again.

49 posted on 06/21/2003 4:28:47 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Don't you just love the Patriot Act and the consolidation about government agencies that give America a Tom Ridge coloring book?

It is funny; you belive in government comics that do nothing.
50 posted on 06/21/2003 4:31:52 PM PDT by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-370 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson