Skip to comments.
New Abortion Ban Ignores Court (Double-Bagger Baby Killer Barf Alert!!!)
Omaha World-Herald ^
| June 22, 2003
| Priscilla Smith
Posted on 06/22/2003 2:12:10 PM PDT by Carthago delenda est
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
$500 to the first person who can pinpoint the words "abortion" or "fetus" anywhere in the U.S. Constitution.
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: SkooldBiDaStayt
The american abortion movement will be featured along with the third reich, stalin, pol pot, and the chinese cultural revolution on the History Channel's
"Unspeakable Modern Crimes against God and Mankind" week. It can't come too soon.
An estimated 42 million children killed since 1973. You can either be with those of us who think it is mass murder or you are against us. No equivocation is possible.
3
posted on
06/22/2003 2:18:34 PM PDT
by
rmgatto
To: SkooldBiDaStayt
5th and 14th Amendments.
4
posted on
06/22/2003 2:20:30 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Carthago delenda est
The proud defender of killing the womb-bound states, "The Center for Reproductive Rights is poised to fight this law once more. With Supreme Court precedent on our side, I am confident that we can win in the lower courts. However, just like my opponents, I am all too aware that the appointment of a new justice could spell the end of Carhart and Roe vs. Wade, both of which are currently hanging by a one-vote majority." I suppose it has skipped her notice that the rite of preborn child slaughter stands merely because of a one vote margin, thus it is not set in stone that such a ruling is in fact ethical or moral, but the proud defender of the indefensible charactewrizes the evil as if it were moral and ethical simply because a court allows it presently. The same was said of slavery, and we all know what a heinous 'institution' that is.
5
posted on
06/22/2003 2:20:55 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: All
"The new federal bill suffers from the same two flaws that doomed Nebraska's law, as if Stenberg vs. Carhart never happened. Once again, rather than limiting the ban to a single procedure, the sponsors have written a ban so broad that it would criminalize the safest and most common methods of abortion starting at the beginning of the second trimester. Even more remarkable perhaps, the sponsors have completely ignored the Supreme Court's holding that any ban must contain a health exception. In essence, its authors have put a new coat of paint on a condemned house and are hoping that no one notices."
Who is this moron. If the SCOTUS strikes down the law with this logic, I will call for the impeachment of every justice ruling against it because they don't have the brains of a 5-year-old if they strike it down. I am serious about their lack of brain capacity, too. If anything, this bill will only cause doctors to switch the methods of late term abortions.
George Tiller in Wichita is doing another late term procedure instead of PBA as it is and says this law means nothing. He is an abortion doctor and I think he knows the loopholes.
Instead of banning all late term abortions, like some House members wanted, this bans only one specific type of late term abortion, partial birth abortion.
This idiot is truly a moron, and so will be the Justices, if they think this bill will be able to ban more than just one narrow procedure.
This bill is a joke.
6
posted on
06/22/2003 2:24:59 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
To: rwfromkansas
It's not a joke, it's a small step in a big battle.
7
posted on
06/22/2003 2:27:33 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: rmgatto
SkooldBiDaStayt, member since June 22, 2003. Hmmmm.
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: baseballfanjm
'FreedomCalls' wasn't getting the proper respect with that handle, so it came back in another incarnation.
11
posted on
06/22/2003 2:33:25 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: SkooldBiDaStayt
Kidnapping, counterfeiting, threatening the president are all federal crimes, among others. Why not abortion? Is this really a state's rights issue, or is it an issue of national values?
12
posted on
06/22/2003 2:34:26 PM PDT
by
rmgatto
To: SkooldBiDaStayt
An alive baby in the womb is a human being, regardless of the Mother's religious beliefs. As the Declaration of Independence states, 'endowed by our Creator with ... LIFE, then liberty, then the pursuit of happiness.' This isn't about citizenship, it's about the right to remain alive and not be slaughtered on your preferred altar of specious choice. Killing an alive individual human being is not a 'reproductive choice', even if you want with all your heart for it to be, to insure an escape for irresponsible behavior.
13
posted on
06/22/2003 2:37:35 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: SkooldBiDaStayt
You should stop conflating issues. I have written my Congressman to have him rescind the law that bestow citizenship on the those born here to "illegals".
I have also written him to support the overturning of Roe and Doe because there is no Constitutional basis for either.
I write him frequently to align with forces who would stop the insanity of aborting American children while opening the gates of America to an unnaturally high number of immigrants taking their rightful places.
In no case has he taken my advice.
Now a question for you. If you justify abortion by money being taken from you, then why limit it to any trimester? In fact why limit it to the unborn?
14
posted on
06/22/2003 2:38:17 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
" I have written my Congressman to have him rescind the law that bestow citizenship on the those born here to "illegals"."
"I write him frequently "
"In no case has he taken my advice"
Hint- perhaps he has heard of:
"Amendment XIV
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
and therefore you Congress Critter, whatever his other failings, knows that he cannot "rescind the law that bestow citizenship on the those born here to "illegals'".
Please let us know when your Congressman starts taking your advice,
for that will be the time to truly worry.
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: John Beresford Tipton
Yhe Constitution is an amendable document. And hubris can be overcome with an AA type plan.
Good Luck John.
17
posted on
06/22/2003 3:20:54 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Carthago delenda est
The bill, which is similar to one already passed by the Senate, is expected to be signed by the president shortly.Not soon enough. I sure hope it's done before summer recess. Wouldn't want it to be forgotten about and have events and/or elections get in the way.
Message to GWB...if you delay the signing and something happens to stop the ban from being put into effect, you're not going to talk your way out of that one. It can't wait for another election cycle...it's too important.
In fact, it should've been done before the trip to the Middle East!
20
posted on
06/22/2003 3:35:23 PM PDT
by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson