Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The rape of marriage
www.freedominstitute.ca ^ | Alex Peters

Posted on 06/23/2003 6:47:29 AM PDT by Capt. Canuck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
"their brute force penetration into marriage by the back door"

Ouch.

1 posted on 06/23/2003 6:47:29 AM PDT by Capt. Canuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Capt. Canuck
Yup. Don't remind us how gays make love. Anyway, when Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau gave Canada an enforceable Charter Of Rights and Freedoms he upended the Fathers Of The Confederation who for good reason refused to provide for judicial review. They believed Parliament should be supreme in making the law and that if it trangressed the rights of the people, they could hold it accountable in the voting booth. In the old days of parliamentary supremacy, no court in Canada would have dared to read an ideological notion into the law contrary to the intentions of the elected representatives of the people.
2 posted on 06/23/2003 6:53:22 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonathansMommie
This will affect our lives more than we know...
3 posted on 06/23/2003 6:56:43 AM PDT by netmilsmom (God Bless our President, those with him & our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Canuck
It is my belief that marriage was created and instituted by God. Just read the book of Genesis in the Holy Bible. It was designed for a union between a man and a woman. Any variation of this union by government or any other organization is absolutely ridiculous and is a complete corruption of something so sacred. Then again, so isn't everything else that has it roots in God. I myself...LOVE MY WIFE!
4 posted on 06/23/2003 6:56:51 AM PDT by cre8ivenotes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cre8ivenotes
Its the old joke: God would have a partner exactly like Adam if He hadn't screwed up with that side he took out of the poor fellow.
5 posted on 06/23/2003 6:58:38 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cre8ivenotes
To clarify my previous post. When I said the following line:

"Then again, so isn't everything else that has it roots in God" I mean that government and other organizations change and distort things so out of context that they become corrupted from the original.
6 posted on 06/23/2003 7:01:16 AM PDT by cre8ivenotes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The part of the charter that forbids discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation is also a court-created amendment to the constitution. It was SPECIFICLY left out of the charter of rights but the courts ruled it to be in there in violation the constitution's amendment formula.

I wish Ontario defied the ruling and created a constitutional crisis. We need one, perhaps Alberta can help with that.
7 posted on 06/23/2003 7:04:32 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Push for a complete repeal of the Charter Of Rights and Freedoms and a restoration of parliamentary supremacy. The original design of the Fathers worked well and its time to take Canada back to it.
8 posted on 06/23/2003 7:06:27 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Canuck
Divorce, feminism and pre-marital cohabitation among heterosexual people have done ten times more to change the institution of marriage in the West than gay marriage can or possibly will.

Fifty years ago, when asked to define the key provisions marriage, a reasonable person could have answered "a lifelong union in which a man assumes from a woman's father the obligation to support the woman and the right to be obeyed by the woman, and pursuant to which a woman grants sexual access she would otherwise withhold and agrees to bear and raise the children of the union of the union with the man's support and subject to his oversight."

There is literally not one word of that equation which is presently accurate.
9 posted on 06/23/2003 7:06:39 AM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Canuck
By the "logic" of the Ontario Court, there is no logical reason to have ANY restrictions on arrangements that constitute a marriage. The most obvious is multiple-partner arrangements, next, incestuous relationships, but using their "logic" one can easily make a case for human-animal "marriages".

They're out in looney land. The belief that by the stroke of a pen they can overturn natural law, common law and thousands of years of history is farcical. The Ontario Court should be impeached forthwith.

10 posted on 06/23/2003 7:09:24 AM PDT by jimt (Never let the facts get in the way of a good slur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: only1percent
"Divorce, feminism and pre-marital cohabitation among heterosexual people have done ten times more to change the institution of marriage in the West than gay marriage can or possibly will."

Divorce, feminism, pre-marital cohabitation and homosexual marriage are all just symptoms of the same disease, Liberalism. Liberalism is what has been attacking the family for decades and will not cease until everything God intended as normal is considered abnormal and everything abnormal is considered normal.

11 posted on 06/23/2003 7:13:15 AM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jimt
Of course. But then they were all appointed by the Liberal government in Ottawa. In Canada, ALL judges are named by the federal government.
12 posted on 06/23/2003 7:13:52 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Its the old joke....

Not much of a joke.

13 posted on 06/23/2003 7:54:45 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cre8ivenotes
It is my belief that marriage was created and instituted by God. Just read the book of Genesis in the Holy Bible. It was designed for a union between a man and a woman. Any variation of this union by government or any other organization is absolutely ridiculous and is a complete corruption of something so sacred.

Since you are referring to the Old Testament, didn't those characters often have more than one wife? It was also okay in the Old Testament to sell your daughtes into slavery.

Apparently God had a changing view on marriage and women.

14 posted on 06/23/2003 8:04:11 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Canuck
Any marriage older than four years is better than average these days. I've been married twenty-one easy, enjoyment filled, very educational years. By the time I reach up into real numbers, 'marriage' won't have any meaning.
15 posted on 06/23/2003 8:08:42 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laotzu; netmilsmom
These people need to keep their lifestyle inside the bedroom and stop forcing it upon everyone else,raising flags,and marching in freak parades.
16 posted on 06/23/2003 9:08:34 AM PDT by JonathansMommie (How are inlaws different from out laws? Out laws Are wanted!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
"It was also okay in the Old Testament to sell your daughtes into slavery.

Book, and Chapter please.

17 posted on 06/23/2003 9:18:55 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Windsong
Exodus 21:7 And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do.
18 posted on 06/23/2003 9:53:27 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: only1percent
"Divorce, feminism and pre-marital cohabitation among heterosexual people have done ten times more to change the institution of marriage"

Those things exist OUTSIDE the institution of marriage. Gay marriage is a hostile infiltration of the institution.
19 posted on 06/23/2003 10:28:23 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: only1percent
"Fifty years ago, when asked to define the key provisions marriage..."

The traditional definition of marriage in Canadian law came from the 1800's and wasn't anything like what you say it would have been (and was) just 50 years ago.

"There is literally not one word of that equation which is presently accurate. "

My wife and I have a very happy and traditional marriage, I guess we run in different social circles than you do for we know many others with such marriages. It is still the ideal that nearly everyone aspires to and people hold in respect those who manage to pull it off. The fact that many fall short of it is not relevant as that is a reflection of problems in society, not problems with the institution of marriage itself.
20 posted on 06/23/2003 10:43:15 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson