Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"What You Can Do About Bush"-View From The Left ("Elevated Risk" Barf Alert)
San Francisco Chronicle | June 23, 2003 | Harley Sorensen

Posted on 06/23/2003 10:42:33 PM PDT by eric_da_grate

What You Can Do About Bush VIEW FROM THE LEFT

Harley Sorensen, Special to SF Gate Monday, June 23, 2003


From our 1776 Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness -- That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government ..."

And, also from the Declaration of Independence:

"... when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce [the people] under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security."

And, finally:

"The History of the present King of Great Britain is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States."

Take out "King of Great Britain" in the last paragraph above and substitute "President George W. Bush," and you have a perfect beginning for a modern American Declaration of Independence.

Folks, Bush has gone too far, too many times. He is a one-man wrecking crew, destroying, bit by bit, what decent men and women have created and improved upon for 227 years.

We have to stop him. We have to do it soon. If we don't, we won't have an America to protect.

Perhaps some of you can't see the forest for the trees. Perhaps you're too close to the picture to see it clearly. But, I assure you, the rest of the world knows what's going on in America. The rest of the world is aghast. "What is happening to America?" they ask. "Why don't the Americans do something about Bush?"

Last week I got an unbelievably heavy surge of e-mail from readers. And roughly 80 percent had the same question: "What can I do?"

What can I do? What can anybody do? Does it help to write to members of Congress? Should I write letters to the editor? Please, please, tell me, what can I do?

My answer last week was, "I don't know." But I've been thinking about it, and I've come up with a few ideas that might actually work, if we're lucky.

And if we're good.

First, let me tell you what won't work: violence. Any violent attempts to correct our national problems will do nothing but make them worse.

A new American revolution at this point would be counterproductive. It would just divide us and lead us into civil war. And any thought of assassination is idiotic.

We need nonviolent solutions.

Our first step, I believe, is to hold public rallies and protest demonstrations. I know, I know, I opposed the recent anti-war demonstrators, but there's a difference. The anti-war demonstrators had no chance of succeeding.

Anti-fascist demonstrators might have better luck.

"Fascism" is an incendiary term when applied to America, but consider its dictionary definition: "A political ... regime ... that exalts nation ... above the individual and that stands for a central, autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation and forcible suppression of opposition."

With the exception of economic regimentation, the Bush administration seems to fit the "fascist" definition rather neatly.

Bush is not a dictator, but is he "dictatorial"? I'd say he is. My dictionary says "dictatorial" "stresses autocratic, high-handed methods and a domineering manner." That fits George W. Bush's style to a T. In fact, he even once said, on his first trip to Washington after being elected, that his job would be easier if he were a dictator.

In any event, it's time to start demonstrating against this man and what he represents. It's time to declare our independence from this man. We need to create a small army of modern Thomas Paines.

Bush's war against Iraq has become the disaster many of us feared it would become. Our troops are being killed on a daily basis. So are Iraqi citizens. We've virtually destroyed Iraq's major cities.

We've accomplished our stated goals -- getting rid of Saddam Hussein and his ethereal weapons of mass destruction -- so what are we doing there? It's time to pull out and leave the Iraqi oil behind.

There is no shortage of administration sins upon which to focus and demonstrate against. We could have massive demonstrations in every American city every day of every week.

Take the FCC decision of a fortnight ago. The only people who favored it were the three commissioners who voted for it, the Bushies who led them and the communication companies that stand to increase their fortunes from it. The remainder of America was against it, yet it slithered its way into law.

We should be protesting anti-American stuff like that. We should make our voices heard.

Just last week the Bushies edited out data about climate change in an Environmental Protection Agency report. Bush made it clear early in his administration that he has no interest in environmental protections that might cost industry money, so he and his cronies are pretending global warming can't possibly exist.

We should be protesting stuff like that. The air we breathe and the water we drink are far more important than any company's profits.

But we must not divert our energies. To be successful, we must focus. Our job is to protect ourselves from Bush. We should let other social ills pass for the moment. Saving our nation is more important than saving the whales.

To be successful, our movement can't be limited only to Bush's political opponents -- Democrats, liberals and professional rabble-rousers. We need good conservatives who are tired of playing follow the leader as they watch our liberties go down the drain.

The salvation of our nation is not a partisan issue.

In Congress, we need more John McCains -- senators and representatives who think for themselves and refuse to slavishly follow the party line. We need conservative citizens who will do the same. We need brave Democrats in office (if they exist!) and even braver Republicans, like Jim Jeffords of Vermont, who risked all to save his nation.

We need the help of rich people who love their country, people like George Soros or Bill Gates Sr. or Bill Gates Jr.

We need to get out of Afghanistan as well as Iraq. For all our bluster over there, we control perhaps one neighborhood of Kabul. The rest of the country is controlled by warlords and drug lords. The opium-poppy crop is leaving Afghanistan by the ton -- so where is our sanctimonious "war on drugs"?

Folks, Bush and his gang have angered our enemies and inspired them to try harder. Thus, our foes are doing exactly what we would be doing if we were in their shoes: planning bigger and better attacks. We treat them as if they are one criminal organization run by Osama bin Laden, but in fact they're a hydra-headed monster that can't be defeated. Chop off one head and another appears.Our only hope is to learn to get along with them, and the Bush people are doing just the opposite.

We should be protesting such a stupid foreign policy, not just in the streets but in letters to the editors, calls to talk shows and discussions with our friends and neighbors.

We need courageous foreign-service officers who will tell it like it is. We need civil servants who will risk their jobs to serve their country. We need rival political parties, like the Greens and Libertarians, to back off their dreams -- for now -- and join the fight to save our nation.

We need corporate CEOs to draw the line and quit paying the bribes demanded by both parties. "But, Harley," the CEOs will argue, "if we don't pay, we lose out, our profits drop and we lose our jobs." That may be true, but the health of our nation is more important than any company's profits, any man's job. If we lose this good thing we have going here, this wonderful United States of America, we may never get it back.

And we need character in our press. The much-chronicled sins of one cheating New York Times reporter pale compared with the propaganda that comes out of Fox News or MSNBC on a daily basis.

I know that sucking up to the lowest common denominator builds ratings, and high ratings translate into bigger paychecks, but our nation is at stake and it's time to stop pandering. We need a responsible press. You and I should demand a responsible press.

So, organize. Do what you can as an individual. We have to fight back. I've made a few suggestions, but I know from experience that people who read this column can come up with a thousand better ones. Do that. And spread the word.

Will all our efforts drive Bush from office? No. But we can distract him, and slow down his attempts to rebuild America in his own image. In 17 months we can vote him out of office. If our movement is powerful enough, we'll have a choice then between a good Democrat and a good Republican not named Bush.

"...Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..."

(Late-breaking news: I just heard VoterMarch is sponsoring a permitted protest from 5 pm to 7 pm today in Manhattan, where Bush will be staging a $2,000-a-plate reelection-campaign fund-raiser at the Sheraton New York Hotel. I've also heard a rumor that an anti-Bush march is planned for July 4 in Philadelphia. So the movement is already under way!)

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: algorelostgetoverit; antibush; barfaltert; brownshirts; bushbashing; castratethegreens; democrats; dnctalkingpoints; duh; dummycrats; extremeleftwing; greenparty; leftwingextremists; looneyleft; lovedclintonswars; notapeacemovement; overthrowgovernment; propalestinianwar; radicals; rats; revolution; saddamites; traitors; treason; yellowdog; yellowdograts
All bold mine.

Now that you've had a chance to wipe tonight's dinner off your keyboard, a few thoughts:

1) This clown comes dangerously close to advocating the unthinkable....He's running it up the flag-pole just halfway and concludes that such a solution would be "idiotic", at best.

2)He suggests that anti-war demonstrations have failed, therefore, a "more 'subtle' approach called "Anti-Facist Demonstrations" might endear the cause to the average American.

3)He bravely suggests that appeasement is the only way to deal with terrorism....Perhaps we could all sign a letter of apology to Bin Laden and pray for his forgiveness..."After all, we deserved it."

4)The press must find it's courage again!...."Pandering" to the lowest common denominators (you and me) has produced high ratings, but the entire nation is at stake and most Americans agree that conservatives don't actually count as 'thinking people' in country.

5) The Libertarians and the Greens are just getting in the way....As good Americans, they should abandon their beliefs and agendas and concentrate all their efforts on electing a Democrat who might beat Bush, because America itself is at risk.

He uses a dictionary in this rediculous essay to find literal definitions for "Fascism" and "Dictatorial".....The point being that any uncertainty about Bush's character and motives by a skeptical reader of this garbage will be quelled and the obvious conclusion should be reached.

Harley Sorensen...."Cretin".

1 posted on 06/23/2003 10:42:33 PM PDT by eric_da_grate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eric_da_grate
3)He bravely suggests that appeasement is the only way to deal with terrorism

Funny how the anticapitalist radicals who make up this movement won't give up their fight to appease conservatives.

2 posted on 06/23/2003 10:46:01 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
It's about everybody else except us.

Well said.

3 posted on 06/23/2003 10:49:58 PM PDT by eric_da_grate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eric_da_grate
I cannot BELIEVE what I am hearing, I cannot even quite comprehend that this guy used the word "assassination" in such a context! I am ENRAGED that such a thing could get printed in a major daily yet! Good Lord, what the heck is going on? Are we going to need to put down liberal terrorism soon in addition to the IslamoNazi kind?
4 posted on 06/23/2003 11:31:45 PM PDT by lib-r-teri-ann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lib-r-teri-ann
I was stunned too....This is really pushing it and it's as good an indicator of just how determined these clowns are to get their way....A very underhanded way of telegraphing to a discontent audience that his collective ideas considered EVERY possible solution to acheiving a 'Bush-free' America....The mere mention should earn him a visit from the Feds.

Keep in mind that best adjective he could muster for committing such an act is 'idiotic'....Hardly a word that springs to mind when considering what's at stake in the present day world, wouldn't you agree?

5 posted on 06/24/2003 12:54:21 AM PDT by eric_da_grate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eric_da_grate
I know that sucking up to the lowest common denominator builds ratings, and high ratings translate into bigger paychecks, but our nation is at stake and it's time to stop pandering. We need a responsible press. You and I should demand a responsible press.
The First Amendment does not assume a "responsible" press, it assumes that readers will be sceptical.

A responsible press would be wonderful--but if "press" refers to the whole of journalism, we've never had one. And never will. </scepticism>

6 posted on 06/24/2003 3:33:06 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Would this fool advocate assasination if it wasn't divisive? This guy gives me the creeps. What this loser calls Bush's arrogance is simply the role any majority party President would assume. These Democrats seem to think they have a God given right to unearned power. Message to Dems-you lost. Get over it!
7 posted on 06/24/2003 8:47:12 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson