Posted on 06/24/2003 11:04:17 AM PDT by rudy45
I hope I got the model right. It holds 10 rounds, and is hammerless.
Questions:
Why is the spent shell hitting me in the face? I thought it's supposed to go off to the side.
I had a tendency to flinch and blink when I fired. Should that go away with practice?
Was I loading the magazine the right way, by inserting one round at a time and pushing down on the ones already in the magazine? Wouldn't it be easier to have some lever or slide on the outside of the magazine, that would depress the "floor" all the way, thereby making loading easier?
How does this model compare (in terms of size, weight and recoil) to Sig P232 .380?
Thanks.
If you look at the video before she shoots, it appears that the point of aim is at the chest of the officer attempting to cuff the suspect. Watch how much she lowers the point of aim before the AD that impacts just to the right of the suspect's head - to get that low, she had to be negligently aiming at the other officer. I'm betting that she noticed that she was aiming at the officer's chest, said "oh my" and got all nervous and sweaty as she lowered the gun and then looked around to see whether anyone else noticed that she almost shot her partner. At that point, her finger convulsed on the trigger. What a moron.
I'll agree to that one. I have 2 HK's, a 9mm full-size USP and a Compact .40. Awesome guns, a little pricey, though.
The 19 is the *middle bear* 9mm version, not quite as lengthy as the original Glock 17 model, the first version introduced and known as the P.80 to the Austrian military, nor as compact as the smaller glock 26, meant for use as a hideout version. The Model 19 is thereby a nice compromise, though I prefer the balance of the longer model 17, having had both model 17s and 19s [and the mini-Glock in the .45 caliber Model 30 version]
Why is the spent shell hitting me in the face? I thought it's supposed to go off to the side.
It is, and it will sometimes, particularly when the pistol is fired from the left hand. The ejection port of the Glock was purposely designed to be very large and open to lessen the possibility of an ejecting case being caught as the slide snaps back forward; this was a particular concern with the fully-automatic mechanism of the Model 18 9mm pistol, outwardly resembling the Model 17 but with the additional option of emptying it's magazine in less than a second. Accordingly, a 33-round extended magazine was also developed for the model 18, which can be used in the other 9mm guns as well. That might be something for you to consider as a potentially useful accessory someday. But practice and familiarity with the individual gun helps. BTW, it's worse when a piece of hot brass gets caught between your eyeglasses and eyelid. Ow.

I had a tendency to flinch and blink when I fired. Should that go away with practice?
It can be unlearned. A good coach can be a particular help, as can work with a subcaliber training unit, not available from Glock but made as an aftermarket accessory. A seperate .22 handgun is nearly as useful as a training aid, however, and is a fun challenge to master in its own right.
Was I loading the magazine the right way, by inserting one round at a time and pushing down on the ones already in the magazine? Wouldn't it be easier to have some lever or slide on the outside of the magazine, that would depress the "floor" all the way, thereby making loading easier?
Yes it would, and such an integral or seperate loading tool has been built into several submachinegun designs and one or two handguns in the past. But it increases the mechanical complexity and could be a detriment to concealment, so seperate loading assist devices are available, including one from Glock specificly for their pistols, and there's such a device from the Triple-Break company that I've always favoured, very similar to the one the US Army provided for the M3 submachinegun. They're usually available at well-stocked gun shops in the $15-$20 range, or can be found online *here* priced at $15.95 each. They're particularly useful if either you have a great many magazines to reload, or only one that you have to recharge between firing strings. It does help to have several magazines available, in practice or especially if troubles come your way.

How does this model compare (in terms of size, weight and recoil) to Sig P232 .380?
the Sig is a bit smaller, and since the distance between its front and rear sights is less due to the shorter barrel, is a bit harder to shoot as well; this is called the sight radius and is usually more of an issue to practical accuracy than any ballistic shortcoming from the different barrel lengths. The .380 cartridge of the Sig is less powerful, making it less effective, particularly in the hands of a shooter less certain of perfect placement with the less powerful cartridge. Again, every little bit helps, and the more practice you get with either, the better.
The Sig has an aluminum alloy frame, thus lighter to carry but subject to wear and scratching moreso than a steel frame, and possibly more susceptable to peening or cracking from extensive shooting. The famed Walther PPK in the same caliber was available either way, and was most generally preferred in the steel-framed version; likewise the excellent Russian Makarov and former Communist bloc copies thereof were of steel, and are quite sturdy for extended longterm use.
Thanks.
Any time! And FReegards...good luck with curing that flinch [dry firing practice helps] and the straying brass problem.
-archy-/-
Because the Glock is a piece of crap.
"I had a tendency to flinch and blink when I fired. Should that go away with practice?"
No, not while firing a Glock. It's a piece of crap.
"Was I loading the magazine the right way,"
There is no right way; the Glock magazine is a piece of crap.
"How does this model compare (in terms of size, weight and recoil) to Sig P232 .380?"
You've got to be kidding! That's like comparing a cow chip to steak dinner.
Now that I've totally destroyed your confidence in your toy, let me show you a REAL gun:
I was with TC and convinced him to buy a Sig because he just wasn't the right caliber to own a Glock!!
Eaker
Are those loud angry knocks I hear at your door???
I just called Eaker and was told he had just lit out like
a bat out of hell, destination unknown...
Stir'n it, steppin' in it, makin' chile with it.......
TC ain't got no limits!!!
;<)
Yes, but it goes away even faster with a bit of mental playacting. Each time you go to fire it, tell yourself that *this* time it's unloaded, it's *not* going to make a big bang noise, jump in your hand, and throw brass down your shirt, honest, you're just going to make it go "click" on an empty chamber. That's right, lie to yourself. Don't pull the trigger until one part of your brain has at least semi-convinced the other part that you're just "dry-firing" this time. Yes, this actually helps.
If you're a fan of the movie "The Matrix", you can also repeat, "There is no spoon". ;-)
The more you anticipate the point in the trigger pull where things go "boom", the more you'll be unable to avoid either hesitating for a moment at that point, or "snapping" the trigger at that point. Either makes for lousy accuracy. Your trigger squeeze should be gentle and smooth, *not* jerky. It shouldn't be like trying to trigger a mousetrap while yanking your hand out of the way of its jaws. Also note the word "squeeze" -- try to concentrate on a motion that's more like gently squeezing the pistol (i.e. pressing the trigger backwards while pressing the handgrip forwards with equal amounts of force. Too many people try to literally "pull" the trigger, which can make the whole pistol rotate against a "pivot point" where the back of its handgrip meets the crook of your thumb, pulling the point of aim up, or to the right, or both (and the more you jerk the trigger instead of squeeze, the more the amount of pivot).
As you squeeze the trigger, the point where the gun goes "bang" should always come as somewhat a surprise to you. Try hard *not* to anticipate it.
Was I loading the magazine the right way, by inserting one round at a time and pushing down on the ones already in the magazine?
That's how most people do it, yeah.
Wouldn't it be easier to have some lever or slide on the outside of the magazine, that would depress the "floor" all the way, thereby making loading easier?
Maybe a bit, but relying on a tool leaves you up the creek when you need to load up without a tool handy (which may be the case either for your own firearm, or another). You might as well learn the "unassisted" way from the start. And it's not that hard.
Ditto the Witness. Almost the same gun, but for some reason the magazines are not interchangeable.
Now, take the NRA safety course. It will be good for you and it will also give you a chance to meet experts who know all that anyone needs to know about guns.
Ask questions, admit that you know little about guns. They will respond positively, they will be delighted to give you info about firearms.
Okay, Dix! Now how much did Eaker pay you to say that?
When I drag out that new Walther PPK at the next shoot, I want you to shoot my Sig and my Walther.......then tell me about the Glock.
How are yer feelin'?
After yer done being embarassed, then we can take'em to the car wash and clean them with hot soapy water!!! Yer's will just be a big ole hunk-o-rust by the time you get home and ours will be ready for the next shoot!
Eaker
My point is that if I run completely out of Hoppe's #9, I'll go to Academy and buy some more before I go to the car wash.
And I always embarrass myself on the pistol range!
I've gotten used to it.
OH! Slight correction:
That's a Walther P99, 9mm, instead of a PPK.
Agreed.
Wearing a GLOCK or NRA ballcap will ward of bad guys more then your concealed GLOCK will
The NRA firearms instructors hat does the the trick nicely.
A leather pouch on a belt, worn in cross-draw position left of your belt buckle (even empty) along with the ballcap will educate the criminal mind and prevent most uneccessary confrontations
Very very true.
As to the rest they go without saying.
i have done research into the problem , why the ejected catridges hit my face . its because of bigger ejection ports on glock and hk handguns. the ejection port extends upwards and some rounds are not ejected sideways but upward and backward to the face. what do you think?
plus, i am right handed but my dominant eye is left so gun is right in front of my face so, the probability of ejected catridge hittin my face is higher compared to shooters with right dominant eye.
can you please guide me in choosing the a handgun in .45 auto with following chracteristics?
1. extreamely reliable and very durable
2. polygonal barreling and other any features for highest accuracy.
3. ejection port to the right (not extended upwards).
4. decocker and manual safety(with safety on the pin should be blocked and not just the trigger).
5. fast target accquisition sights ( eg 3 dots or glock type sights , and perferrably night sights to glow in dark)
6. medium or just compact size for concealed carry( but in no way the compactness should compromise the reliability and durability factor. meaning, size factor can be compromised but not the reliability and long service life factor of the gun).
7. smoothest and lightest trigger pull possible as in my experience trigger pull adds considerably to acccuracy.
8. light weight if possible (but not at the stake of any traits mentioned above).
your help will be very much appreciated,
zeeshan
Very curious. Posting to a 5 year old thread.
Yeah! Get out of here newbie....this is where we hold our secret meetings.
I had a tendency to flinch and blink when I fired. Should that go away with practice?Stop being afraid of the gun. Dont' grip the gun too tightly, don't fear the kick and percussion. Be the bullet. Forget the gun.
Uh, the noob is at post 82.
My first experience with a handgun was with the U.S.A.F. issue .45 semi-auto.
So I can not only sympathize with you, I empathize with you.
Long guns on the other hand don’t bother me so much. I shot 36 out of 40 - 38 was sufficient for a markshman ribbon - on the range in U.S.A.F. boot camp (first time I’d ever shot a firearm in my life) with iron-sighted M-16 at 100 yds. Subsequently, times I’ve gone to the range with buddies who let me shoot their firearms, I told ‘em their scopes / sights were off by this much in that quadrant. They either took it in to get it professionally sighted (if they didn’t know how to), or adjusted it accordingly. Then I’d be able to put multiple rounds through the same hole.
I just never cottoned to the .45 that’s all. Unfortunately I’ve never shot anything else, so I couldn’t tell you how I’d appreciate 9mm or 10mm anything.
The one handgun that I’m pretty certain I’d like is a Walther P-38. Its so balanced that it must be nice to shoot. What impressed me so much with that gun is that my hand didn’t feel like it was holding a gun, or that a gun was in my hand, but that the gun and my hand were one. I can’t describe the feeling any other way.
Small caliber, but sweet weapon. It has at least a 10 round clip, semi-auto, and if you can’t hit whatever enemy is trying to kill you in a single clip, you deserve to die. Its that simple.
I think something like that is a perfect urban weapon. A .45 would be bad news here in the apartment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.