Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airport Screeners May Get X-Ray Vision
NewsDay ^ | 06/25/03 | LESLIE MILLER

Posted on 06/26/2003 6:40:11 AM PDT by bedolido

Edited on 06/26/2003 6:42:34 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: bedolido
These images are produced by computer analysis and a program could be written to eliminate the display of anything other than objects of interest. It would be like the green screen used for digital effects in movies.
61 posted on 06/26/2003 8:25:09 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
a program could be written to eliminate the display of anything other than objects of interest.

Who (or whom) would make the decision as to what was "of interest"? Depending upon the weight, age and gender of the subject, it would be nice to set the standards.

62 posted on 06/26/2003 8:29:39 AM PDT by bedolido (please let my post be on an even number... small even/odd phobia here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty; Frank_Discussion
You want into the deal too!!

WOOHOOO...

Frank... another potential investor.

63 posted on 06/26/2003 8:30:50 AM PDT by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Who (or whom) would make the decision as to what was "of interest"?

Just looking at the sample pic makes it clear that there is a sharp difference in brightness and contrast between skin and hard objects. Just boosting the contrast would be a start, but computer imaging can be much more sophisticated.

Compared to what NASA does to images this is simple.

64 posted on 06/26/2003 8:33:49 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"These images are produced by computer analysis and a program could be written to eliminate the display of anything other than objects of interest. It would be like the green screen used for digital effects in movies."

Presumably, like every other such imager, each machine would need to be adjustable to select its display capabilities. The operator or manager would be twiddling the knob (even for each image) to have the capability to discern objects of different densities. Don't try to convince me that no one would be tempted to get the best look at private parts, or that the factory could (or would) lock out such capabilities.


65 posted on 06/26/2003 8:36:30 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
I think you are mistaking a TV with a digitally produced image. This is not a television. There is no image to adjust except that produced by a computer program. The device will not go into production with the controls you imagine, for the very reasons you state. People would stop flying.

Until someone involved in the development of the device says otherwise, I say the privacy problem can be fixed. And will be fixed if the device is ever to be used.

66 posted on 06/26/2003 8:47:39 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
How about stealth underwear? Fly in under the wire, so to speak...
67 posted on 06/26/2003 8:50:24 AM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: plusone
All those weird angles would be awfully uncomfortable...
68 posted on 06/26/2003 8:54:29 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
It would be considered an act of terrorism, interfering with the functioning of the air port screeners. Remember the guy that put a note in his baggage lambasting the screeners?
69 posted on 06/26/2003 8:54:48 AM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
LOL!!
70 posted on 06/26/2003 8:57:07 AM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: crazykatz
Somebody post a picture of Daffy Duck...
71 posted on 06/26/2003 8:58:33 AM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: eno_
"If God had meant us to fly naked, we'd have been born that way, with wings. Naked wings. Or something."

I gotta tell you, that made me giggle!
72 posted on 06/26/2003 9:04:22 AM PDT by b-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Comrade, you are hereby charged with the "criminal omission of a "BARF ALERT" as outlined in Section 8-4U of the FR Code.

On a different note, I will now seek to obtain radio-opaque letters to spell out "TSA-SUX" and "SCAN THIS" under the front of my shirt and trousers, respectively.

First Amendment rights, you know.......... 8~)

73 posted on 06/26/2003 9:10:12 AM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Careful with those metallic letters - especially "I," "Y," and "L."

Don't give the TSAstitutes an excuse to bust you for attempting to smuggle through their checkpoint metallic objects which "might be used as weapons".....

74 posted on 06/26/2003 9:13:22 AM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: js1138
" And will be fixed if the device is ever to be used."

Your optimism is quite admirable. Are you perchance a Dale Carnegie graduate?? 8~)

75 posted on 06/26/2003 9:15:19 AM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: plusone
Sufferin' succatash!! pssst!
76 posted on 06/26/2003 9:16:42 AM PDT by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: tracer
Comrade, you are hereby charged with the "criminal omission of a "BARF ALERT" as outlined in Section 8-4U of the FR Code.

I am new to FR (about 3-4 months) and was not aware of the code. I throw myself on the mercy of the FR-Court.

77 posted on 06/26/2003 9:19:06 AM PDT by bedolido (please let my post be on an even number... small even/odd phobia here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: tracer; Frank_Discussion
Hey, wait a minute.... frank discussion and I are starting a company to make wonderful decorative and verbally descriptive underwear for folks...JUST LIKE YOU!!

Frank...potential CUSTOMER on post!!

78 posted on 06/26/2003 9:19:07 AM PDT by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
LOL!
79 posted on 06/26/2003 9:19:49 AM PDT by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: meandog
"What about er, uh, "package" challenged males...I can just hear the giggles and snickers behind the x-ray counter!"

You're seeing the glass as half-full. The full-glass perspective features a plastic enhancement prosthesis of a density that enables it to blend in with (usually) soft tissue on the scan....

80 posted on 06/26/2003 9:20:17 AM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson