[CholeraJoe]

SCOTUS sided with the perverts.

SCOTUS supports right to Privacy.

[proxy_user]

It will be interesting to see if Santorum's argument now comes into play, or if the court will find a way to finagle around it.

[Tribune7]

Does this mean you can have sex with your 18-year-old daughter now? How about 15-year-old if a resident of Hawaii? (that's the age of consent in that state.)

[Notwithstanding]

There are things that one should not be able to consent to.

One cannot by law consent to be a slave or another.

This is an example of the govt disallowing consenting adults from doing their thing.

Privacy is not an absolute right - and it certainly is not present in the constitution.

[BushCountry]

SCOTUS supports right to Privacy.

Excuse the pun, but this Sodomy ruling is a very slippery slope. How far are they going to carry this right to privacy, don't forget the man/boy love associations will love this ruling.

[SJSAMPLE]

Exactly.
If they can prohibit things in my own home, what's next - enforcement?

[MissAmericanPie]

Homosexuals do not want privacy, I live across the street from a pair that like to exibit their depravity to the neighborhood kids in front of their picture window.

[Xthe17th]

This is sad, because the porpose of the anti-sodomy laws aren't to invade anyones privacy, but to allow schools to banish the promotion of homosexual activities. With them, they could disalow Gay/Lesbian clubs, meetings, clothing, parades, etc. since it advocates an "activity" (yuk, never thought I'd call it that) that is against the law.

[billbears]

SCOTUS supports denies right to Privacy. of states to maintain their internal affairs as they see fit

The Republic is dead, long live the Empire

[Ol' Sparky]

What's next? The legalization of prostitution? Or will it be lower the age of consent and allowing consensual "intergenerational" sex?

[Final Authority]

There is no absolute right to privacy, as there is no absolute right to exercise free speech. Apparently, the SCOTUS believe the founders wrote the Constitution without regard to morality or what is best left to the States to consider. This SC, in their waning days, seem intent on speeding up the process to make the USA indistinguishable from the nations from which in the past we held in lower esteem. For all intents and purposes this latest decision and revelation changes nothing, just the understanding that the members of the SCOTUS are the most important people in the USA. The Dems have known this for years because most of the liberal gains in the past were by way of the courts because the consensus was not there for legislation. It is now made obvious for all of us who believe in the values that made the USA great that the President must, need I say, stack the court, at all levels, with like minded judges.

[Spiff]

SCOTUS supports right to Privacy.

SCOTUS furthers homosexual agenda.

[BlazingArizona]

SCOTUS supports right to Privacy.

It went without saying that the Court would strike down this particular Texas law, which allowed "sodomy" for some people but not for others. What was unexpected, and most gratifying, was that the decision goes much further and establishes a general right of privacy.

This is a black day for busybodies nationwide. Three cheers!

[PISANO]

There is NO right to PRIVACY in the CONSTITUTION. Those words DO NOT exist in the 4th amendment.

[rwfromkansas]

which is used to support abortion