Gays Overjoyed, Conservatives Despair Over Sodomy Ruling (Mega-barf ALERT)

Associated Press ^ | 06-26-03

[Brian S]

In a gesture of gratitude for the Supreme Court's decision Thursday striking down a Texas anti-sodomy law, gay-rights activists lowered the huge rainbow flag that always flies over the city's Castro District and hoisted the Stars and Stripes in its place.

[zoyd]

I wonder how many freaks will celibrate my taking it up the a** tonight !

You're taking it up the a** tonight?

[DaBroasta]

Cult Of The Anus

ROTFLM_O

[Malsua]

>>Looks like another AIDS crisis is on it's way...
<<

So this law stopped homo sex?

Understand, I think this behavior is absolutely disgusting, but this law should have never been enacted and I don't recall that it was ever enforced. What is the big deal?

Homos in Texas stopped boffing each other cuz it was against the law? Heh. SURRE.

-Mal

[Kevin Curry]

[Newbomb Tur is] taking it up the a** tonight?

Why are you concerned? Isn't your home large enough for visitors?

[pyx]

The precedent set in this case could *easily* be applied to a number of other areas in which government should be prohibited from regulating.

And of course we all know MOMMYMENT never selectively enforces regulations against groups it deems are unpopular. Nope... never !

[zoyd]

Why are you concerned? Isn't your home large enough for visitors?

Ah ha, Kevin! Good one! Insinuate my sexuality! That's pretty adult behavior, KC.

No, I thought it was strange that someone who so despises gay sex would ponder about it far more than people who really don't care (this is assuming he meant to say "BY" instead of "MY").

Any more exciting, pithy commentary, KC?

[RAT Patrol]

I agree. Unless the roll-over Republican Congress finds its lost principles and passes a Constitutional Marriage Amendment, gay marriage is a done deal.

[Brilliant]

What the Supreme Court did was it read the provision of the Constitution relating to Constitutional Amendments out of the Constitution. Apparently, the Supreme Court can now change the Constitution to say whatever it wants it to say at any given moment in time. In order words, the Justices have appointed themselves dictators.

[AmericaUnited]

So this law stopped homo sex?

No, I meant that now there would be some exuberant celebrating, causing another "flareup".

[oceanview]

that is indeed what is will take.

But on the flip side, the 13 states that still have these laws should have gotten rid of them years ago. And arresting those two men, the case that started this, was insane. It gave the powerful gay legal rights organizations a case to use to start implementing their full agenda through the courts, and they have won round one, and will now use the courts to go after adoption & marriage rights.

[2rightsleftcoast]

Yes, I know this is a little off topic but wondering why we have to be bombarded with gay rights issues contantly.
Our local news channels recently gave very big coverage to gay pride parade in Hollywood. I have two questions, why do gays need to have a parade and if they do, does it warrant news coverage? Gay,straight, I don't care, but do I have to hear about it non stop?

[pyx]

Why do homosexualists use an accusation of homosexualism as a put down on anyone who opposes their Homo-Juggernaut if there is nothing wrong with being a homosexualist as they claim ?

Of course any five year old knows not to play with his own or other's poop because its dangerous. Oddly, the Supreme Court doesn't understand this with their insistance on decimating the 10th Amendment.

[oceanview]

simple answer: the industries that control, produce, and provide US media, are heavily staffed by gays. That is where they work. They are of course free to hold those jobs, but that is the answer to why we constantly "hear about it".

[RAT Patrol]

I agree about arresting the two men. I highly suspect that the whole thing was staged from start to finish, including the arrest.

[DaBroasta]

Gay,straight, I don't care, but do I have to hear about it non stop?

Homosexuals can't procreate they must recruit.

[zoyd]

Why do homosexualists use an accusation of homosexualism as a put down on anyone who opposes their Homo-Juggernaut if there is nothing wrong with being a homosexualist as they claim ?

First off, I don't know what a homosexualist is, precisely, but I'll entertain your question. People who 'oppose the Homo-Juggernaut' get offended when you suggest that THEY'RE homosexual. That's why.

[2rightsleftcoast]

I agree completely. You are so right.

[Malsua]

No, I meant that now there would be some exuberant celebrating, causing another "flareup".

Well...I can buy into that. It's a meaningless celebration. They have nothing more than they did before

-Mal

[2rightsleftcoast]

Agree, heard someone on Chris Matthews show tonight say that the men continued what they were doing after the police had come in? Is that true? If so, this was all a set up and they got what they wanted with the ruling today.

[yooper]

"As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown..."

It already is; spending is disproportionate to the statistics. Also, you should have added a "no pun intended" to your use of the word "overblown"..........