Regarding cameras in the courtroom for the trial... My own personal opinion is that so many people in the USA have been very much involved emotionally with the loss of Laci and Conner that it would be an injustice to all of us for no cameras...Since the beginning of this whole thing all has been kept from us and sealed. I think this is an unfair situation because we as citizens had the right to so many documents but as stated have been sealed. I sympathize with the Rochas for their feelings of not wanting it televised but we too need closure and by being able to see the actual trail and not just what is reported in the media is fair and just to us the citizens of USA
posted on 06/27/2003 6:54:07 PM PDT
Good points and we should not forget it is the "People v. Peterson". Rochas can can have a very private civil suit if they wish to gain control of Laci's estate.
Just to be clear: I was not posting my thoughts on cameras in the courtroom, just answering someone's question if the Rochas had in fact expressed that they don't want them.
if the judge rules for the DA, geragos is toast! He wants lights, cameras, and actions!
But I too say, and think for the reasons the DA cited, sounds to me a weak case to ban the tv's.... Media will win this one!
posted on 06/28/2003 7:11:28 PM PDT
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
so many people in the USA have been very much involved emotionally with the loss of Laci and Conner that it would be an injustice to all of us
I think this is called projection.
posted on 06/28/2003 7:15:29 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson