Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theodore R.
Gee...about halfway through the article before they describe what "lost" means. Sounded as though it had wandered off and they couldn't figure out where to.
4 posted on 06/28/2003 5:36:42 PM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lepton
If you lived there, believe me, you would know what "lost" means. I have seen beautiful crops of cotton one day with nothing but stripped stalks the next. I could never have been a cotton farmer because I could never have lived with losing crops.
5 posted on 06/28/2003 6:00:40 PM PDT by arjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lepton
Gee...about halfway through the article before they describe what "lost" means. Sounded as though it had wandered off and they couldn't figure out where to.

I too, wondered what caused such significant losses. Apparently the pre-emergence chemicals put down at the time of the planting (to supress the emergence of unwanted weeds and grass) gravitated downward and stunted or prevented the cotton seed from germinating. Excessive rains could conceiveably have contributed to the problem.

All this is speculation on my part; not having grown cotton since the early fifties before pre-emergence chemicals were used. Back then, the grass that sprouted among the cotton stalks had to be removed by hand, using a cotton hoe.

7 posted on 06/28/2003 7:06:58 PM PDT by C7pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson