Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
Thread after thread. Post after post.

Everyone who looks at the matter without hatred of Jews coursing through their veins, comes to the same conclusion about these Palestinians.

There are some comments concurring with the article.

But the comment stop short. The keyboard doesn't click to conclusion.

Which conclusion?

That George W Bush, is the best friend these beasts ever had. That he will give them a terrorist State, in the heart of Israel. A dagger at Israel's throat.

But you can't tell the truth on FreeRepublic. You're accused of being a "Bush Basher". Freepers don't understand why they let you post here.

You violate the two commandments of the FreeRepublic religion, worship Bush and hate the Clintons.

I remember the good ole days when I used to lurk and read vicious comments about the Clintons if they only smiled at Palestinians. Hillary kissed Arafat's wife and the posts were incessant, vicious, and damn funny.

Bush kisses their ass, sides with them against Israel, criticizes Israel for defending herself and almost all the Freepers go silent.

11 posted on 06/30/2003 8:07:13 AM PDT by Courier (Quick: Name one good thing about the Saudis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Courier
Bush is not necessarily smootching the Palestinians' collective butt, as implied.

Rather, it is like when he went to the Taliban, in Afghanistan, and asked them to turn over Osama bin Ladin.

But the Taliban, bearded men with burning eyes, thought they were preserving a principle, and refused to comply.

Saddam Hussein was asked to open up his storehouses and laboratories to UN inspectors.

But the Ba'athist regime chose to dissemble, prevaricate, and obstruct, and while it was not a flat refusal, it was clear that no progress was being made, and there was compelling evidence that Saddam was concealing SOMETHING.

Likewise, the Palestinian Authority may believe they are preserving some principle, and will spurn the most generous offer that Bush could make. Does anybody remember the really long deal that was offered to Arafat during the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001"? If Arafat turned that one down, then the PA may be almost depended upon to turn anything down. But unlike the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001", Bush means exactly what he says. Take the deal, and keep it, or we send your military arm through the same meat grinder as the Taliban and the Republican Guard.
12 posted on 06/30/2003 10:12:16 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Courier
And what does Israel do?
Dither and debate.Advance, then retreat.
Refuse to take decisive actions and claim the USA must end their seemingly eternal problems for them.
Israel does not seem to back its own leaders, much less ours.
But of course, it as all the fault of George W. Bush./sarcasm//
19 posted on 12/26/2003 3:54:54 PM PST by sarasmom (Message to the DOD : Very good , troops.Carry on. IN MY NAME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson