Sounds like a strawman to me. I've never heard any other interpretation than "kill = murder", and all I read is the KJV.
They also documented how he got the Coral Ridge Ministry televangelists to film it's secret installation so they would have exclusive video to sell for profit.
Much of the opinion, I have just skimmed over the entire opinion, relates to how he has crushed his own valid constitutional arguments by opening his mouth. If he just put the plaque there, and didn't say anything, his argument would have been stronger, but he told all, and often that his motives were religious, and the court noted that it had allowed religious symbols, especially those that have been unchallenged after being around along time, if there are secular applications as well as religious.
The Judge denied himself that argument because he kept bragging on why he was doing it.