Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

YOUNG SOUTH KOREANS CHAFE UNDER U.S. PRESENCE [Gannett hurler]
Gannett via Bloomberg, no url | 7/3/3 | JOHN YAUKEY

Posted on 07/03/2003 11:18:05 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker

SEOUL, South Korea - To the Pentagon, North Korea and its

developing nuclear weapons program represent an unacceptable threat. 

   Not so to South Korean Kim Tai-joon, who lives within range of at

least 10,000 North Korean artillery emplacements ready to rain

destruction down on his home city of Seoul. 

   ''I think it's an exaggerated bluff,'' the 28-year-old said.

''North Korea is the world's most isolated nation. It is not the

threat the United States has made it out to be. They've demonized the

north.''

   This is not an uncommon attitude among South Koreans Kim's age, who

know the Korean War only as a handed-down story or an abstract history

lesson. 

   Multiple surveys show many young South Koreans now view the United

States more negatively than North Korea, a situation inconceivable a

decade ago. 

   These generations raised after the Korean War ended in 1953 now

make up 80 percent of the population in the south. They have grown

resentful of American influence, which they claim has become a major

impediment to the reunification of the Korean peninsula. 

   Differences between South Korea and the United States threaten to

weaken ties between the two Cold War allies and vastly complicate the

North Korean nuclear situation, at least from the Bush

administration's point of view.

   Forces and events 

   The changes in attitude among South Koreans have been shaped by a

mix of geopolitical forces and emotionally charged local events. 

   Bush's hawkish view of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il's regime and

its drive for nuclear weapons has caused deep divisions between the

pro-unification factions and the older Korean conservatives who

remember the invading forces from the north. 

   Equally important has been the behavior of U.S. forces in South

Korea. 

   After a U.S. Army vehicle crushed and killed two young South Korean

schoolgirls in June 2002 and U.S. authorities acquitted the soldiers

involved, anti-American sentiment erupted. 

   This was especially evident among younger Koreans, who took to the

streets in violent demonstrations. 

   ''Even among the very young middle school students you had a very

dangerous reaction,'' said 30-year-old Kwang Lee.

   Kim's regime took advantage of the unrest to wage a propaganda

campaign against the United States and older conservative South

Koreans in hopes of splitting South Korea and weakening the resolve

against him. 

   It worked to the extent that South Korean-American relations became

a central theme in the presidential elections late last year,

prompting eventual winner Roh Moo-hyun to adopt a strident

anti-American campaign to win support among younger voters. 

   President Roh has since tried to mend fences with Washington, but

that ignited a series of sometimes violent student demonstrations late

last spring near the U.S. Embassy. 

   ''There are pockets of the young generation that look favorably at

North Korea and Kim Jong Il because they see him as a rebel who does

as he pleases, and they don't like what they hear coming from

Washington about him,'' said Park Chan-bong, South Korea's deputy

assistant minister for unification. 

   Dreams of reunification 

   For those who want reunification, the reality is not terribly

encouraging. 

   South Korea's Unification Ministry is working toward a peaceful

resolution of the international standoff over North Korea's nuclear

aspirations, the normalization of relations between the north and

south and the development of a ''future-oriented'' U.S.-Korea

relationship. 

   But so far, there has been virtually no movement on any of those

fronts. 

   The United States, South Korea, China, Russia and North Korea can't

even agree on a format for nuclear talks, let alone a process for

scaling down the tension. 

   And even if Kim can be persuaded to give up his nuclear plans and

open the north, daunting obstacles to unification remain. 

   North Korea still runs on its Cold War-era ''military first''

economy, where vast amounts of the scarce natural resources are

siphoned off to support Kim's million-man army and regime. About 30

percent or more of the nation's output goes straight to the army,

according to military intelligence estimates. 

   What the crippled economy can't supply, Kim's regime has sought to

make from drug running, counterfeit currency and weapons. In April,

Australian authorities seized $48 million in heroin from a North

Korean freighter. Earlier, a ship bound for Yemen was found to be

loaded with North Korean-made scud missiles. 

   In Washington, this raises the question: Would Kim sell nuclear

technology to keep his cash-strapped regime afloat? 

   This apparently concerns the Bush administration more than it does

many young Koreans. 

   They have lived with a developing nuclear threat from the north for

a decade, and many are convinced that the United States has

exaggerated it to push forward an aggressive foreign policy in a

region now looking to take a larger role in handling its own affairs. 

   ''We want an equal relationship with the United States,'' said

28-year-old John Junf. ''Not a top-down master situation like we have

now.''

   



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: korean
Editors: GNS national security correspondent John Yaukey recently returned from Asia where he studied terrorism as part of a journalism fellowship at the East-West Center, which promotes U.S.-Asia relations Second in an occasional series of stories on terrorism and related topics.

Some set-up, eh?

1 posted on 07/03/2003 11:18:06 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
There's a few of those floating around like that. As long as you can live comfortable and not is some run down 'yogwan' for three weeks, I'd say 'go for it'.
2 posted on 07/03/2003 11:19:50 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Folks, I am NOT in Tokyo right now. So please don't worry about me being nuked by N. Korea. Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Well, if they really do feel that way, perhaps we should pull out completely and invite the North to come on in and take over the South.

Yeah, I know, lots of wonderful South Koreans wouldn't be too happy with that. But their freedom was purchased with ours and their blood. You'd think even the youngsters would realize that.
3 posted on 07/03/2003 11:23:25 AM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Numbers Guy
I feel no obligation or interest in protecting ingrates. Give them a few weeks of Kim Il Jung and I believe they'll realize the US was very good to them. But PULL OUT of South Korea and Germany so these people don't have to suffer having Americans defending them.
4 posted on 07/03/2003 11:31:18 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Numbers Guy
The average South Korean student would tell you that they had to fight for their own freedom - we supported their right-wing dictators for too long. Then again, who was it that gave asylum to Kim Daejung and other SK dissidents when their government was jailing and torturing them? We knew from Day One that a democratic Korea was in our interests and when the day came we wholeheartedly welcomed it.

I don't doubt that SK would beat off another NK attack and decisively defeat Kim. I'm also sure that NK won't dare attack in the first place since China won't support an invasion of one of their biggest trading partners, not to mention the most pro-PRC democratic nation on earth. If these trends continue, someday SK (or reunited Korea) may well end up being our strategic enemy, Beijing's lackey and dagger pointed at Japan. It's just disheartening that this had to happen only after they got their freedom.
5 posted on 07/03/2003 11:34:00 AM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Maybe their tour of duty as soldiers can be extended to make up for the departure of American soldiers.

6 posted on 07/03/2003 11:38:58 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
The "Menu"over there would still consist of two-choices:"Dog or Cat"if The United States of America had not fought and sacrificed her sons there!!!Talk about INGRATES!!!!!!!!!
7 posted on 07/03/2003 12:21:33 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
BE CAREFUL OF WHAT YOU WISH
8 posted on 07/03/2003 12:22:07 PM PDT by y2k_free_radical (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
My wife is Korean, and I spent six years there and three more in Japan. My wife loves her ex-country dearly, however, she has conceded (finally) that maybe South Korea has lost its way and turned against the USA as its ally in Asia. If one is understand Rummy correctly then a drawdown of US forces and relocation of those remaining to about 100-miles south of the DMZ is in order. The North has two choices which are either starve to death maintaining its hugh military, or to use that military in a comtemptous attempt to reunify the country. The biggest problem the North faces if successful in reaching Seoul is channeling the rank and file troops around this city so they don't stop fighting when they see the wealth of the South....
9 posted on 07/03/2003 1:06:43 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumper
I frankly assumed the writer was cherry-picking info to cast S. Koreans in the least favorable light, to encourage a widening of any rift between our two nations.
10 posted on 07/03/2003 1:15:39 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thud
fyi
11 posted on 07/03/2003 1:53:34 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Yaukey used to write for the Ithaca Journal. Shows, doesn't it?
12 posted on 07/03/2003 1:59:27 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Y'know, that actually crossed my mind, but I thought, nah...
13 posted on 07/03/2003 2:02:25 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
YOUNG SOUTH KOREANS CHAFE UNDER U.S. PRESENCE

Meantime young North Koreans literally starve to death by the millions under Kim Jung Il and pray for a U.S. intervention and a U.S. presence. I'd dearly love to give those ignoramuses in the South their wish and pull out.

14 posted on 07/03/2003 2:04:53 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
More proof of "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
A.Einstein
15 posted on 07/03/2003 2:30:49 PM PDT by Valin (Humor is just another defense against the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bandleader
Talk about INGRATES!!!!!!!!!

Seoul Rally Denounces North Korean Nuclear Weapons
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/933282/posts

S. Korea: The Sunshine Policy in Flames
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/928213/posts

S. Korea: Million Men Rally on Video
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/854313/posts
16 posted on 07/03/2003 2:46:00 PM PDT by Valin (Humor is just another defense against the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson