posted on 07/06/2003 9:05:03 AM PDT
I've met quite a few queers. Overall, they are a hapless, self-loathing lot once you peel the "fluff" away.
posted on 07/06/2003 9:13:41 AM PDT
(Sorry, but this tag line has been blocked by the FTC "do not tag" list!)
I fear for the Republic..
posted on 07/06/2003 9:15:58 AM PDT
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
So what is the solution. Requiring reporters to state they are straight or homosexual? NYT is dominated by homosexuals but they are not loosing money even with the blair scandal.
Even hollywood gets coy with who is in or who is out. They use the tag line "this is nothing wrong with being "gay"." There is everything wrong with being homosexual.
Perhaps in the name of diversity they should start to collect data on sexual preference. This way employers could list the orientation they are hireing. Sorry we are looking for more straight people/homosexual people. Can you imagine college admissions? "What do you mean you checked the homosexual box!"
Before lawrence there were coments by homosexuals that this was not about marriage. After lawrence, the tv news stories were all showing homosexual "marrigae" ceremonies.
I don't get the Dallas Morning News anymore because they were continually running full page articles on the poor, poor plight of homosexual couples and how people are always looking at them because they are gay.
I've had it up to my eyeballs when people who really deserve our pity are marginalized and ignored, like Jesse Dirkhising.
posted on 07/06/2003 9:22:26 AM PDT
Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism
Bump for a fantastic read on media bias.
posted on 07/06/2003 9:52:02 AM PDT
Yeah, I just looked out the front door.
Dead heteros everywhere.
Liberty was great until everybody wanted some.
posted on 07/06/2003 10:37:36 AM PDT
(There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
"In February, Hall of Fame pitcher Sandy Koufax ended his 48-year relationship with the Los Angeles Dodgers, due to a defamatory story a reporter planted in the New York Post, insinuating that Koufax was a homosexual."
Sandy Koufax was not gay, who really cares.
posted on 07/06/2003 11:38:59 AM PDT
What you have said in this post, the Jim Dwyer segment...IMHO, Could be applied to any Media Outlet ABCNNBCBS/NYT/LAT/WP/BG
..."the Sins of Ommissions". :|
posted on 07/06/2003 11:42:37 AM PDT
(Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
We could begin with a new term which expresses disdain & loathing of homosexuals & their behaviors. They call heterosexuals 'homophobes'-ridiculous. They attempt to be-little what they may not overcome through argument-they call heterosexuals 'breeders'. They decide they are 'cool', fasionable & clever. They are immoral & suffer for this. Stop allowing them to set the rules for debate or define the terms.
'They' are not gay. They are homosexuals. Gay means happy.
Carefree. The use the term is a perversion of English.
Homosexuals are not happy. They are not carefree. They are perverted, largely unhappy & frequently infected by communicable biological agents which may kill-they may be organically diseased. Some reports recently state that a number of homosexuals actually have a thrilling death wish-they seek infection with AIDS. Nothing happy about that.
My husband has a lot of homosexual patients. For the most part, they're depressed, alcoholic and suicidal.
posted on 07/06/2003 2:05:00 PM PDT
(Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
Ping, ping, ping, ping...you might find this interesting. : )
To: mrustow; All
"New York Post both belong to News Corp., the conglomerate owned by Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch"
Excuse me ... I thought News Corp owned WASHINGTON POST - not New York Post.
posted on 07/06/2003 3:31:59 PM PDT
by The Final Harvest
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
As William McGowan reports, in the month after Jesse Dirkhising's murder, only 46 stories were devoted to his fate. "The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story altogether and continued to do so through the March 2001 trial of one of the murderers, which resulted in a conviction. (The other assailant later pled guilty.)" Dirkhising's murderers are now fighting their convictions.
OK. If the Supreme Court ruled that there is NO 'sodomy' law, then Jesse died in a private/personal act. RIGHT?
To: EdReform; pram; RAT Patrol; FormerLib
posted on 07/06/2003 5:40:20 PM PDT
("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
To: mrustow; joanie-f
"As William McGowan reports, in the month after Jesse Dirkhising's murder, only 46 stories were devoted to his fate. 'The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story altogether and continued to do so through the March 2001 trial of one of the murderers, which resulted in a conviction."
Envision the day when the public finds its sanity & then goes absolutely nuts on the skulls of these warped SOBs who've declared war on the nation.
The result will surely make Krystalnact look like child's play.
The sycophant quisling mediot's state-of-the-art "Sin of Omission" modus operandi will destroy this Republic, eventually; or, the Republic will destroy the bastards who'd practice [it].
There can be no in between.
...thanks for the ping, mr.m.
posted on 07/07/2003 6:23:24 AM PDT
This is just frightening . How did these few people get so much power?
posted on 07/07/2003 10:44:57 PM PDT
(The left have blood on their hands.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson