Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

God...not G-d

Posted on 07/07/2003 3:50:21 AM PDT by grumple

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last
To: holden
Personally, I don't see either as 'right' or 'wrong'.............those who choose to express His name as G-d do so out of reverence and love; those who choose to say it out loud or write it out do so for the same reason.

My opinion is that such a debate falls under the squabbling that we were cautioned about. Regards.

41 posted on 07/07/2003 5:32:14 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (For or against us.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: grumple
The problems with email is that they are rarely factually true.
42 posted on 07/07/2003 5:32:21 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I rarely forward e-mail, because I get sick of people forwarding to me. The subject matter here just struck me as profound.
43 posted on 07/07/2003 5:35:05 AM PDT by grumple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Spelling God as G-d is exactly like spelling Dog as D-g. A "God" is a deity. The word "God" is a noun, not someones name.

It SHOULD be readily apparent that using "God" instead of "Jehova" is already honoring the Judeo-Christian deity by not using his name.

44 posted on 07/07/2003 5:37:08 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: varon
Would one then show the same honor when speaking the word by saying "Gee (G) dash (-) dee (d)" as in "Oh my Gee dash dee" ?

Many Christians thought so at one time, apparently:

gee (see 2nd def.)
golly
gosh

All ways to avoid taking the Lord's name in vain.

However, as I understand it, the custom of omitting the "o" from the name of God is not just to show respect but to prevent a (witting or unwitting) third party from showing disrespect. Spoken speech is not a permanent form and can't be defaced.

45 posted on 07/07/2003 5:37:52 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: grumple
It is profound. One of the best I have read.
46 posted on 07/07/2003 5:38:40 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
It SHOULD be readily apparent that using "God" instead of "Jehova" is already honoring the Judeo-Christian deity by not using his name.

Is it your intent to insult Orthodox Jews or are you just flaming for flame's sake?

47 posted on 07/07/2003 5:40:48 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
I understood #41 as fully contained in #33.
Regards,
HF
48 posted on 07/07/2003 5:42:02 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
yet you don't see the faithful saying "J-piter" or "Ath-na".

For that matter, you don't see the faithful of Jupiter or Athena saying much of anything lately...

49 posted on 07/07/2003 5:45:40 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
I never saw this practice (of writing "G-d") until quite recently, and only on the Internet. Growing up as a frequent reader of a broad range of political, religious, and philosophic literature, it was something I never encountered among authors of any faith. My guess is that it's something "new age."
50 posted on 07/07/2003 5:45:59 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Is it your intent to insult Orthodox Jews or are you just flaming for flame's sake?

Neither. Just pointing out the fact that the failure of our education systems seems to extend to religious "Sunday" schools as well.

Do you disagree that the proper name for the Judeo-Christian deity is in fact "JHVH/IHVH/Jehova"?

51 posted on 07/07/2003 5:47:38 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: zook
New Age?

See my post #4.

52 posted on 07/07/2003 5:47:45 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Which came first: Judaism or Christianity?
53 posted on 07/07/2003 5:48:38 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LindaSOG
"Normally, we avoid writing the Name by substituting letters or syllables, for example, writing "G-d" instead."

The problem is you have simply replaced one symbol for another with the exact same meaning and intention. It is simply symbolism. We just happen to use a small circle to represent the "ah" sound. A "-" or "#" or "@" used in its place still has the same meaning. Honorable and good intentions but in the scheme of world events meaningless.

54 posted on 07/07/2003 5:48:58 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (I have the biggest organ in my town {;o))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
For that matter, you don't see the faithful of Jupiter or Athena saying much of anything lately...

I know of a couple of people that are Grecco/Roman revivalists. Just because they are no longer making headlines doesn't mean they aren't still there....

55 posted on 07/07/2003 5:49:06 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: grumple
Some people write/type the name out that way for their own religious reasons. Who am I to dictate to them what is right for their religious beliefs?
56 posted on 07/07/2003 5:49:54 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Which came first: Judaism or Christianity?

Are you trying to be funny?

57 posted on 07/07/2003 5:52:15 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: Catspaw; LindaSOG
Thanks for the ping, but LindaSOG seems to explained it well in 23, including the evolving consideration of the internet as a non permanent source.

Got it right about shame and ridicule as well.

60 posted on 07/07/2003 5:56:58 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson