Skip to comments.
Justice Breyer: U. S. Constitution should be subordinated to international will
WorldNetDaily ^
| July 7, 2003
Posted on 07/07/2003 7:00:07 AM PDT by mrobison
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 581-582 next last
To: Bryan24
Astute observation - You are absolutely right - It just goes to show you how incredibly powerful the homosexual agenda is.
101
posted on
07/07/2003 7:56:55 AM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: M. Peach
The POTUS appoints each Justice of the Supreme Court.
To: M. Peach
Do you know who makes the decision to appoint Chief Justice? Is it Bush?
It's whoever the President is when the position opens up, with the "advice and consent" of the Senate.
103
posted on
07/07/2003 7:58:13 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, air-burst artillery and thermonuclear weapons)
To: Jim Robinson
I don't want to ruin your day but if you haven't seen this, you sure the heck should.
To: Bryan24
Here's to a backfire of the new stragedy (sp-intentional).
105
posted on
07/07/2003 7:59:16 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, air-burst artillery and thermonuclear weapons)
To: RnMomof7
see posts 61 and 90.
Especially the second paragraph or so of the 1957 petition.
To: mrobison
THIS is AWFUL....it reminds me of the 2000 election debacle....the implications of this are unbelievable....and I was just starting to hope we (America) had turned a corner to the RIGHT
107
posted on
07/07/2003 8:00:48 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(If you're not learning......you're not living.)
To: mrobison
I'd say that is an act of treason!
108
posted on
07/07/2003 8:01:07 AM PDT
by
PatrioticAmerican
(When the government controls all information, they control you.)
To: Bryan24; jwalsh07
Good observation, Bryan. It is unprecedented. Lobbying.
109
posted on
07/07/2003 8:01:19 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
To: jwalsh07
Whiletrue, it doesn't negate the possiblity political advantage to be gleaned from remarks such as these. It won't play well at all in Senate races south of the Mason Dixon line and should be a club wielded heavily. Good point.
To: Spottys Spurs
Revisionist thinking has no place in interpreting constitutional law. Any judge who believes it does should step down from the bench.
To: society-by-contract
U.S. Constitution, the oldest governing document in use in the world today The constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is the oldest governing document on earth.
Yeah, but is it still in use? :-)
To: judicial meanz
If our Congress had any backbone, the SCOTUS can be dealt with under Article 3 of the Constitution. If I recall correctly, Article 3 has been invoked some 150 times - but all prior to CY 1900. Congress, however, appears to play it safe in politically dangerous matters - let the SCOTUS take the decision/heat.
To: mrobison
I wonder what Arlen Specter thinks of this from a Scottish law perspective.
114
posted on
07/07/2003 8:05:03 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: zip
Amen.
If Americans' values and mores change along with other foreign elements of "Western Culture", then there is a perfectly fine way of amending the Constitution to make those changes.
To: mrobison
The Constitution establishes itself as the supreme law of the land...with signed, ratified, and proclaimed treaties being debatably co-equal.
Unless and until it is amended, it is subordinate to nothing. Not the Bible, not the UN, not "world opinion", not even the "will of the people", unless said "will" can muster 2/3 of each house of Congress and 3/4 of the state legislatures.
For a Supreme Court justice to not realize this is scary.
-Eric
116
posted on
07/07/2003 8:05:43 AM PDT
by
E Rocc
To: Dick Bachert
"FIRE BREYER!"
That has a nice ring to it.
117
posted on
07/07/2003 8:05:51 AM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: mrobison
Dear Justice Breyer,
The Constitution doesn't allow for clitorectomy, the African/Middle Eastern method of cutting away a woman's clitoris so that she can't feel pleasure.
However, it is allowed by other "constitutions". So, just how do you propose we change ours to ensure "it fits into the governing documents of other nations".
This is not a joke. Just what "parts" of other governing documents are we to adopt in this jerkoff's mind? I will die first, before this man gets his way.
118
posted on
07/07/2003 8:06:41 AM PDT
by
Greenpees
(Coulda Shoulda Woulda)
To: mrobison
A"living constitution" is no constitution at all, as it can eman anything to anybody at any given time. In that case, why even have a constitution, since the "law of the land" can literally change from day to day?
To: mrobison
"You realize that the framers intended those words to maintain constant values, but values that would change in their application as society changed."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't such "changes" the purview of the LEGSISLATURE to CREATE THE CHANGES IN THE LAW?!?! You as a "Judge" are supposed to interpret...not CREATE!
Impeachment is ALSO a legal issue...one I hope you and your Elitist scum learn about first-hand...and will if I have a say in it!
Time to let our lawmakers know that their jobs, which belong to US, are being usurped by unelected elitists!
120
posted on
07/07/2003 8:08:09 AM PDT
by
Itzlzha
(The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 581-582 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson