Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Breyer: U. S. Constitution should be subordinated to international will
WorldNetDaily ^ | July 7, 2003

Posted on 07/07/2003 7:00:07 AM PDT by mrobison

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 581-582 next last
To: RnMomof7
Mom, the best way I know is to document their agenda- based rulings over time, and then circulate recall petitions when you have evidence of them acting under the 'Color" of law ( color of law meaning using the cover of law to advance their political agenda) instead of the "Authority of Law" ( meaning they correctly interpret and apply to each decision without regard to political, ideological, or other considerations.

We need to file complaints on these judges with the judicial review commissions in our respective states every time they do this.

We have to force it. There is no other way. The Libs/Dems/Etc have been very active in the judiciary for years, trying to use it as a check on the ability of conservative political laws that are passed so they can advance their agenda even when they are not in power.

141 posted on 07/07/2003 8:19:00 AM PDT by judicial meanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: ido_now
"Yes, to the will, subordinate everything to the will. Seems I remember someone saying something like that back in 1941 but I can't recall who it was. Can anyone help me remember?"

I think you mean 1936, if you are alluding to Adolph Hitler.
142 posted on 07/07/2003 8:19:06 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
If any of them feel that the constitution should be subordinate to world opinion then they need to be removed immedialtely and tried for treason.

These fools have no idea that they are smoking in the dynamite factory.


143 posted on 07/07/2003 8:20:37 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Hey Bryer, you love Europe so much, go live over there!
144 posted on 07/07/2003 8:20:41 AM PDT by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock
My signature is added.
145 posted on 07/07/2003 8:20:55 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Impeachment,then tar and feathers,and then some time in"The Stocks"before they are run out of town "on a rail"!Back in the good old days,they (The Founders)knew how to deal with this kind of treachery!!!
146 posted on 07/07/2003 8:21:40 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
SO WELL STATED THAT IT MUST BE REPEATED:

The Constitution establishes itself as the supreme law of the land...with signed, ratified, and proclaimed treaties being debatably co-equal. Unless and until it is amended, it is subordinate to nothing. Not the Bible, not the UN, not "world opinion", not even the "will of the people", unless said "will" can muster 2/3 of each house of Congress and 3/4 of the state legislatures. For a Supreme Court justice to not realize this is scary.

147 posted on 07/07/2003 8:21:51 AM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Dane
the Republicans have the majority in the Senate this time, but you'd never know it.
148 posted on 07/07/2003 8:22:32 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: judicial meanz
Perhaps a retroactive search on Him and O"Conner might be useful. This position did not just evidence itself
149 posted on 07/07/2003 8:23:40 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
its in virtually every one of their decisions.
150 posted on 07/07/2003 8:24:19 AM PDT by judicial meanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: jpl
I have no doubt anymore that this court would all but strike down the 2nd Amendment in a heartbeat.

If they try, it would be an act of supreme folly.

These blackrobed tyrants could discover that the Rule of Five might be superceded by Rule 308, AKA the 2nd Amd.

They can declare that gravity is repealed, or 2+2=57, but that will not make it so.

151 posted on 07/07/2003 8:24:29 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
If you see the word "socialist" with President Bush, you can take it to the bank that they come from one of two camps -- DNC/Dean/Clinton or Buchanan


No way that 'true conservatives' would promote the democrat agenda would they? .... LOL.

Guess they are being snookered again by he glib entertainers of the day.......
152 posted on 07/07/2003 8:24:42 AM PDT by deport (When ridin' ahead of the herd, take a look back every now and then to make sure it's still there))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: laconic
We have 51 "R" Senators, and about 21 backbones in them.
153 posted on 07/07/2003 8:25:29 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
But when you look like a word – look at a word like 'interstate commerce,' which they didn't have automobiles in mind, or they didn't have airplanes in mind, or telephones

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't all of these things in existence when the Interstate Commerce Clause went into effect?

154 posted on 07/07/2003 8:25:44 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
then there is a perfectly fine way of amending the Constitution to make those changes.

You nailed it. Legislating from the bench by 5 justices (?) isn't the way.

155 posted on 07/07/2003 8:26:01 AM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: chimera
He is just taking his cue from The US Senate!They violated their collective oaths of office when they declined to even review the body of evidence brought to them by The House managers,let alone conduct the trial of BeelzeBubba as REQUIRED by The United States Constitution!!We are now living in an ere when it seems quite alright to dither over "The Meaning of The Word"IS"!!!!!More of BeelzeBubba's"LEGACY"!!!!!!!!!
156 posted on 07/07/2003 8:26:10 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dogrobber
Interesting read.
157 posted on 07/07/2003 8:27:25 AM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norse
"I actually showed this to my roomates here - all of us are going into the military - and i'll tell you this - we will uphold the Constitution till death. The scary thing is - the military is becoming extremely powerful - it already is - now super weapons like those in sci fi movies are being created - which will make it extremely difficult for freedom fighters to even have a chance."

I disagree, because there are (and will be) many true patriots in the military who will NOT follow such an egregious order, and who will side with the American people against a tyrannical government. And many of those true patriots will bring with them such arms (I can well predict that there will be patriotioc pilots who will side with the people and who will bring their aircraft with them; ditto for some of the subs.
158 posted on 07/07/2003 8:28:21 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
I think it's grand that Breyer had done this public soapboxing --- these issues need to come to a full head, and perhaps this helps do so. As of their very bad ruling two weeks ago, the Constitution, Legislature and all Legislated Law are effectively nullities -- only what a Judge rules is the Law.
159 posted on 07/07/2003 8:28:52 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
The world is growing together in it's jealousy of the United States. It's hatred of the jewish people, and it's disregard for the rule of law.

Guess Breyer would like to see a lot more of that here in the US........

160 posted on 07/07/2003 8:31:35 AM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 581-582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson