Skip to comments.
Adversaries on Gay Rights Vow State-by-State Fight
NYT ^
| July 6, 2003
| SARAH KERSHAW
Posted on 07/08/2003 11:11:14 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
To: jethropalerobber
I am using very slight exaggeration to make a point. The fact is that homosexuals and their supporters in the media, academia, government, liberalized churches and on and on DO want to sexualize the atmosphere of our country. Flaunting homosexual behavior - and teaching in schools, "gay" expressions and actions on TV etc - is one end (probably not THE end unfortunately) of a continuum. Included in the whorehouse atmosphere our country is developing are slut attire, young kids acting out sex that they see or have had forced on them, acceptance of multiple partner sex by mid teen years, adultery as a totally accepted behavior with resultant easy devorce and broken families, etc.
Homosexuality is just the next step, but a big one, since it glorifies the unnatural use of the natural human sex urge. And it makes adulterers and others feel good about themselves, since if two (or three or ten or pick a number) of men practicing anonymous or even monogamous (less usual) sodomy is fine, then at least sex out of wedlock is more normal by comparison.
To: jethropalerobber
62
posted on
07/09/2003 8:08:24 AM PDT
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.)
To: pram
...[they] want to sexualize the atmosphere of our country... right.
sex education was never taught in schools until the gays came and had to "sexualize" schools. there were no depictions of sexuality on TV until gays came in to "sexualize" it. "slut attire," teenage promiscuity, adultery, and divorce - yep, we certainly never saw any of that before the gays became politically active in the 80's.
...it makes adulterers and others feel good about themselves...
all the more reason to legalize gay marriage. but i can see now that you prefer to keep gays in non-sanctioned relationships so that you can continue your absurd scapegoating.
To: scripter
thank you but i have no need of your links.
i know enough gay people to already know what their agenda is: equal treatment under the law for themselves and their relationships.
it's really not all that frightening. you, on the other hand, attempt to frighten people by portraying the extremists within the gay community as if they were the mainstream.
To: kegler4
Well, if I am so wrong, then you must be nothing but another liberal scum attempting to suck the DECENT life out of this country. I wish you nothing but the worst.
65
posted on
07/09/2003 9:08:06 AM PDT
by
ohioman
To: jethropalerobber
all the more reason to legalize gay marriage. but i can see now that you prefer to keep gays in non-sanctioned relationships so that you can continue your absurd scapegoating. Homosexuals have admitted that the reason they want to have state sanctioned "marriage" is to further their agenda of acceptance and even dominance - dominance in the sense that THEY set the rules of society, what is acceptable and what is not. Do you know the rates of promiscuity and monogamy among homosexuals, compared to normal men and women? It's so high as to be ridiculous.
i know enough gay people to already know what their agenda is: equal treatment under the law for themselves and their relationships.
They do not want equal treatment. They want to make the rules. A homosexual is not an identity like race. It is a chosen behvior that can be rejected.
There are absolute moral standards for human society given in every scripture or monotheist religious teaching in the history of the world. By wanting to destroy these moral codes, homosexuals and their supporters want to turn human society into animal society. If you deny that homosexuals and their fellow hedonists such as Larry Flynt and the academicians who are now supporting child/adult sex want to change the rules of society, you are either ill-informed (in which case you should read up before spouting your opinion) or you are purposely lying. One or the other.
To: pram
"
A homosexual is not an identity like race. It is a chosen behvior that can be rejected."
That's the same debate I had with Dilly.
67
posted on
07/09/2003 11:01:25 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
("for every government action, there must be an equal and opposite reaction")
To: jethropalerobber
thank you but i have no need of your links. I realize many folks like yourself are not interested in facts or don't want to comment on them. Sorry to hear that.
68
posted on
07/09/2003 11:48:17 AM PDT
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.)
To: ohioman
How does the President figure that we won't be overextending our troops by sending some to Liberia? I'm sorry, but I don't know enough about this situation.
To: Dilly
...but recognize that the slippery slope argument goes both ways.I'll grant that it's indeed a slippery slope.
If certain people, pushing an agenda, had their way the census information would be collected: caucasian, black, American Indian, asian, homosexual.
It's not a separate race of people, but a very sad and disgusting gaggle.
70
posted on
07/09/2003 1:39:48 PM PDT
by
FBFranco
To: ohioman
"Well, if I am so wrong, then you must be nothing but another liberal scum attempting to suck the DECENT life out of this country. I wish you nothing but the worst."
Yep, that's me. Why just last night my neighbor was saying, "Boy, you sure are a liberal scum sucking the DECENT life out of this country." He even put DECENT in all caps when he said it.
You are obnoxious and a troglodyte. What more can I say?
71
posted on
07/10/2003 5:53:15 AM PDT
by
kegler4
To: kegler4
You are no conservative, that's for sure.
72
posted on
07/10/2003 6:03:38 AM PDT
by
ohioman
To: Tailgunner Joe
"God made Adam and Eve...not Adam and Steve."
To: jethropalerobber
To: Tailgunner Joe
75
posted on
07/18/2003 11:06:03 AM PDT
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson