Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B.C. court OK's gay marriage - first gay couple legally married in British Columbia
Winnipeg Sun ^ | July 9, 2003

Posted on 07/09/2003 5:01:32 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

Wednesday, July 9, 2003

B.C. court OK's gay marriage

Lifts moratorium

By CP

VANCOUVER -- Tom Graff choked on tears yesterday as he vowed to love and cherish Antony Porcino, his partner of 11 years, "as long as we both shall live."

The pair became the first gay couple to legally wed in British Columbia, barely an hour after the province's Court of Appeal lifted a one-year moratorium on same-sex marriages yesterday.

WAITS ON FEDS

The Appeal Court had earlier ruled in favour of same-sex marriages but imposed a ban until next July to permit the federal government to draft a new law redefining marriage.

But gay groups asked the court to revisit its moratorium after an Ontario Court of Appeal ruling opened the door to same-sex marriages in that province and Ottawa began drafting a new marriage law.

The three-member Appeal Court panel noted neither the B.C. nor federal attorneys general opposed lifting the ban.

"It is also apparent that any further delay in implementing the remedies will result in an unequal application of the law between Ontario and British Columbia," the decision said.

Graff, 58, and Porcino, 38, were in court to hear the decision.

"We're thrilled, very proud now, not just for us but for all the people that have been working on this for so long," Porcino said.

B.C. Attorney General Geoff Plant said it was a historic day, telling a local radio station the provincial government had taken no position because the definition of marriage is a federal responsibility.


Previous story: Canada Briefs column


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; gayunion; homosexualagenda
Sheesh and Ick !!

Here is the article regarding the Ontario ruling reference in above article:

Gay couple married after ruling
(Toronto, Canada)


1 posted on 07/09/2003 5:01:32 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Hi Mom!
2 posted on 07/09/2003 5:02:19 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yall
barf alert!


MICHAEL STUPARYK/TORONTO STAR

Michael Stark, left, and Michael Lashner pop champagne
and kiss after their wedding ceremony yesterday.
Leshner called the ruling, "Day One for millions of gays
and lesbians around the world."

Gay couple married after ruling
(Toronto, Canada)

Gays Flock to Divorce Court

Same-sex unions in 'News' -
Dallas Morning News to publish FREE
same sex unions announcements

The Media's Gay Mafia "Queers" the News


3 posted on 07/09/2003 5:02:31 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yall
The Dallas Morning News coverage (AP):


2nd Canada court backs gay marriage

BC joins Ontario in recognizing unions; opponents may appeal

07/09/2003

Associated Press

TORONTO – British Columbia became the second Canadian province to allow same-sex marriage under a court ruling Tuesday.

The decision by the province's Court of Appeal further increased pressure on the Canadian government to follow through with plans to rewrite federal law that defines marriage as between man and woman.

An Ontario court issued a similar ruling last month, leading to more than 250 same-sex couples obtaining licenses to marry in Toronto.

British Columbia's Appeal Court earlier ruled in favor of same-sex marriages and gave the federal government a year to draft a new law redefining marriage. Gay rights groups then asked the court to reconsider the one-year delay after the Ontario ruling.

In its decision Tuesday, the three-member B.C. Appeal Court panel said it was "apparent that any further delay in implementing the remedies will result in an unequal application of the law between Ontario and British Columbia."

Religious and family groups opposed to same-sex marriage said they will ask Canada's Supreme Court to allow them to appeal the Ontario court ruling that legalized gay and lesbian weddings.

Angered by the government's plan to let the Ontario ruling stand and instead propose a new law permitting same-sex marriage, the groups said they would try to intervene.

"The federal government has abdicated its leadership role," said Derek Rogusky of Focus on the Family, a conservative lobby group. "This matter has far-reaching consequences nationwide, and the nation's highest court should be permitted to consider the fundamental issues."

Focus on the Family was joined by the Interfaith Coalition on Marriage, a collection of Roman Catholic, evangelical Protestant and Islamic organizations, in planning to seek intervener status in the case.

Prime Minister Jean Chretien has said his government is drafting a law that would legalize same-sex marriage while allowing churches to decide what ceremonies they sanction.


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/world/stories/070903dnintsamesex.173b3.html

4 posted on 07/09/2003 5:05:19 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yall
Google News Search:

BC court OK's gay marriage
Winnipeg Sun, Canada - 4 hours ago
... But gay groups asked the court to revisit its moratorium after an Ontario Court ... to
same-sex marriages in that province and Ottawa began drafting a new marriage ...

       British Columbia Becomes Second Canadian Province To Legalize Gay ...  - 365 Gay.com
       British Columbia finally permits gay marriage - Gay.com UK
       British Columbia permits gay marriage - PlanetOut
       Boston Globe - 365 Gay.com - and more »

Court set to decide on gay marriage
Atlanta Journal Constitution, GA - 10 hours ago
... Conservative groups have vowed not to accept homosexual marriage. "We are firmly
against the promotion of gay marriage because we believe homosexuality is wrong ...

       The Threat of Gay Marriage - ChronWatch.com
       Major Newspaper Stokes American Gay Marriage Debate - Reuters
       Boston Globe backs gay marriage rights - PlanetOut

Massachusetts Court Set to Rule on Gay Marriage
Gayapolis - 6 hours ago
... Should the verdict come down in favor of gay marriage, couples married in Massachusetts
would be able to challenge laws in other states which ban gay marriage. ...

Massachusetts Could Be First US State To Legalize Gay Marriage
365 Gay.com - 14 hours ago
by Michael J. Meade. (Boston, Massachusetts) The highest court in Massachusetts
is in a position to American legal history and legalize gay marriage. ...

       For gay marriage - Boston Globe

Canadian Family Groups To Fight Gay Marriage In Courts
ClickonSA.com, TX - 19 hours ago
Real Women and Focus on the Family Canada are appealing to the Supreme Court
of Canada a recent Ontario court decision legalizing gay marriage. ...

       Groups open new front in battle over gay marriage - Toronto Star
       Religious groups fight gay marriage - Canada.com
       Ontario Courts Gay Marriage; Ottawa Declines Appeal - Richmond Out in the Mountains
       365 Gay.com - Vancouver Sun - and more »

Gay marriage amendment isn ’ t necessary
York Daily Record, PA - 28 minutes ago
The majority leader of the United States Senate apparently believes that a hot, divisive
battle to amend the Constitution to ban gay marriage is just what our ...

Decision won ’ t necessarily lead to legal gay marriage , ...
Benton County Daily Record, AR - 22 hours ago
... Soon after the decision, US Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and others
said they would support a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. ...

Conservative groups to seek appeal of gay marriage ruling
Ottawa Citizen, Canada - Jul 7, 2003
Real Women and Focus on the Family Canada announced Monday that they are seeking
an appeal of a recent Ontario court decision allowing gay marriage. ...

Battles promised on gay marriage
Arizona Republic, AZ - Jul 6, 2003
... Oregon to Alabama to Massachusetts. Potentially fierce battles over
gay marriage and other rights loom in dozens of statehouses. ...

Gay marriage
Knoxville News Sentinel, TN - Jul 5, 2003
... WASHINGTON - Fueled by a landmark Supreme Court ruling and other legal developments,
an emerging national debate over gay marriage has thrust both President ...


5 posted on 07/09/2003 5:09:57 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Aw Shucks....I'm all choked up!

I bet the divorce lawyers are jumping up and down with glee. A brand new source of revenue has just opened up for them.

The gay community may end up deciding this isn't so great after all. Now they will have to deal with getting "taken to the cleaners" when they get divorced and it may not feel so liberating when they are making alimony payments to all of their ex's.

MKM

6 posted on 07/09/2003 5:10:43 AM PDT by mykdsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom; BigWaveBetty

I wonder if they got married so they could get a two for one deal on perms.

BTW, there is good kissing and bad kissing. That, my friends, is bad kissing.
7 posted on 07/09/2003 5:12:57 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (You're not too smart. I like that in a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
United We Extinct.
8 posted on 07/09/2003 5:15:23 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Minister: "Do you Gary take...um...er...Bruce...to be your...um...to be your lawfully wedded...um...to be your lawfully wedded...uh...to be your lawfully wedded longtime companion..."
9 posted on 07/09/2003 5:18:45 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Homosexuality is deviant sexual behavior and a mental illness.

Homosexuals: 1) subject their body parts to uses nature did not intend, such activities often presenting immediate risk to the participants; 2) are prone to greater suicide, depression and other mental disorders and deficiencies than the heterosexual population at large; 3) are prone to far greater sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, than the (normal) heterosexual population; 4) molest young people (pedophilia) at a far greater rate than heterosexuals; 5) engage in degrading sexual promiscuity, oftentimes engaging in risky sex with many partners during the same event; 6) are engaged in aggressive and widespread efforts to indoctrinate our children by introducing the homosexual lifestyle using public schools as the primary indoctrination “vehicle” and likewise, through the movie/music/TV industry, with the dual goals of gaining school-age acceptance of homosexuality and encouraging sexual activity among children, especially same-sex experimentation; 7) view most everything through a mindset heavily biased in favor of the homosexual lifestyle and culture, which renders them mostly useless when asked to opine on matters that normal heterosexuals better resolve.

The mental deficiencies described herein applying to homosexuals shall not be confused with the deficiencies associated with the left wing democrat/socialist/marxist/ feminist/environmentalist minds, etc., which have their own distinct set of mental disorders.

This doesn't even touch on what the Bible has to say about homosexuality.

10 posted on 07/09/2003 5:32:05 AM PDT by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom
Aw Shucks....I'm all choked up! . . .

I know what you mean. They had me all choked up too. Not for joy, tho!

Tom Graff choked on tears yesterday as he vowed to love and cherish Antony Porcino, his partner of 11 years, "as long as we both shall live."

The pair became the first gay couple to legally wed in British Columbia, barely an hour after the province's Court of Appeal lifted a one-year moratorium on same-sex marriages yesterday.

barf !

11 posted on 07/09/2003 6:11:25 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
hehe !

12 posted on 07/09/2003 6:13:10 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Shame on all of you! You need deep therapy.
13 posted on 07/09/2003 7:17:24 AM PDT by upcountryhorseman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Can't wait for the new TV show: "Gay Divorce Court".

Issues like how to share the August timeshare in the Hamptons, who gets the Striesand box set, etc.

14 posted on 07/09/2003 7:21:36 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
INTREP
15 posted on 07/09/2003 7:29:49 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

16 posted on 07/09/2003 7:30:27 AM PDT by Jaxter ("A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul."- Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imagine
Homosexuals: 1) subject their body parts to uses nature did not intend, such activities often presenting immediate risk to the participants; 2) are prone to greater suicide, depression and other mental disorders and deficiencies than the heterosexual population at large; 3) are prone to far greater sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, than the (normal) heterosexual population; 4) molest young people (pedophilia) at a far greater rate than heterosexuals; 5) engage in degrading sexual promiscuity, oftentimes engaging in risky sex with many partners during the same event; 6) are engaged in aggressive and widespread efforts to indoctrinate our children by introducing the homosexual lifestyle using public schools as the primary indoctrination “vehicle” and likewise, through the movie/music/TV industry, with the dual goals of gaining school-age acceptance of homosexuality and encouraging sexual activity among children, especially same-sex experimentation; 7) view most everything through a mindset heavily biased in favor of the homosexual lifestyle and culture, which renders them mostly useless when asked to opine on matters that normal heterosexuals better resolve.

Since gayness isn't genetic, the rewards of homosexuality must far outweigh the cons you've enumerated or else there would be no homos.

17 posted on 07/09/2003 7:36:37 AM PDT by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
Humans have and can be addicted or attached to myriad practices and habits that horrify people not so addicted/attached. Much is either cultural or due to childhood situations. Just because there are X number of people practicing same sex acts is no indication that therefore such acts are beneficial to them or society at large.
Lots of people voted for Clinton, therefore he was a good choice???
18 posted on 07/09/2003 7:55:19 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
lol ! Laurel and Hardy.
19 posted on 07/09/2003 7:59:17 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pram
Humans have and can be addicted or attached to myriad practices and habits that horrify people not so addicted/attached.

Being addicted to FR is viewed as a horror to commies and members of the lamestream media.

Just because there are X number of people practicing same sex acts is no indication that therefore such acts are beneficial to them or society at large.

X number of people, including me, smoke cigars and drink single malt straight up. There's no societal benefit to that at all and I don't give a flying turd about it.

You find unhappy people sticking their noses into everyone else's business all the time and there's not much you can do about it - part of human nature.

Lots of people voted for Clinton, therefore he was a good choice???

A lot of very wealthy people got richer under Clinton. Ask them.

20 posted on 07/09/2003 8:08:18 AM PDT by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
You find unhappy people sticking their noses into everyone else's business all the time and there's not much you can do about it - part of human nature. \

IF the homonazis stayed out of the schools, out of the BSA, didn't force themselves in to the public eye trying to CHANGE society, I wouldn't give a flying f**k what nastiness they do to themselves in the privacy of their own closet and bedrooms and doghouses.

I strongly object and will continue to do so in a louder and louder voice here and elsewhere about THEM trying to change the society and world to suit them. I and many other conservatives have been perfectly willing to leave them alone. But they do not want to leave us alone.

21 posted on 07/09/2003 8:13:50 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pram
IF the homonazis stayed out of the schools, out of the BSA, didn't force themselves in to the public eye trying to CHANGE society, I wouldn't give a flying f**k

And yet, there they are. Gaining ground.

Being loud and angry isn't winning you any converts. Now what?

22 posted on 07/09/2003 8:31:39 AM PDT by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
Some people say that the homosexualization of society is inevitable, so lie back and take it. That is the same advice that used to be given to women in the event of rape - don't fight it, just take it. Now the advice is to fight back. Well, I'm fighting back. It's only inevitable if wimps give in to the homonazis.

The more people - especially people who still have open minds - hear the truth about homosexual behavior and its consequences both to individuals and society, the more people will reject it's claim that it is either innocuous or beneficial - or inevitable.
23 posted on 07/09/2003 10:12:41 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
The last words of the ceremony are ..."who wants fudge"?
24 posted on 07/09/2003 10:14:47 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
HA! That's great!! LMAO!!!
25 posted on 07/09/2003 10:27:38 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
You've heard of finding your "soul mate"? Some people look for a "butt buddy".

Awwwwwwww....that's tho thweet.
26 posted on 07/09/2003 10:45:45 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
H.J.RES.56 Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. Sponsor: Rep Musgrave, Marilyn N. [R CO-4] (introduced 5/21/2003) Cosponsors: 75 Latest Major Action: 6/25/2003 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COSPONSORS(75), BY DATE [order is left to right]: (Sort: alphabetical order) Rep Hall, Ralph M. - 5/21/2003 [D-TX-4] Rep McIntyre, Mike - 5/21/2003 [D-NC-7] Rep Peterson, Collin C. - 5/21/2003 [D-MN-7] Rep Davis, Jo Ann - 5/21/2003 [R- VA-1] Rep Vitter, David - 5/21/2003 [R- LA-1] Rep Pitts, Joseph R. - 6/2/2003 [R- PA-16] Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. - 6/2/2003 [R- MD-6] Rep Goode, Virgil H., Jr. - 6/2/2003 [R- VA-5] Rep Wilson, Joe - 6/2/2003 [R- SC-2] Rep Weldon, Dave - 6/2/2003 [R- FL-15] Rep Pence, Mike - 6/10/2003 [R- IN-6] Rep Istook, Ernest J., Jr. - 6/10/2003 [R- OK-5] Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. - 6/10/2003 [R- NC-3] Rep Ryun, Jim - 6/10/2003 [R- KS-2] Rep Johnson, Sam - 6/10/2003 [R- TX-3] Rep DeMint, Jim - 6/10/2003 [R- SC-4] Rep Akin, W. Todd - 6/10/2003 [R- MO-2] Rep Burgess, Michael C. - 6/10/2003 [R- TX-26] Rep Norwood, Charlie - 6/10/2003 [R- GA-9] Rep King, Steve - 6/24/2003 [R- IA-5] Rep Isakson, Johnny - 6/24/2003 [R- GA-6] Rep Souder, Mark E. - 6/24/2003 [R- IN-3] Rep Kennedy, Mark R. - 6/24/2003 [R- MN-6] Rep Miller, Jeff - 6/25/2003 [R- FL-1] Rep Lewis, Ron - 6/25/2003 [R- KY-2] Rep Hayes, Robin - 7/8/2003 [R- NC-8] Rep Barrett, J. Gresham - 7/8/2003 [R- SC-3] Rep Burns, Max - 7/8/2003 [R- GA-12] Rep Collins, Mac - 7/8/2003 [R- GA-8] Rep Rogers, Mike D. - 7/8/2003 [R- AL-3] Rep Wamp, Zach - 7/8/2003 [R- TN-3] Rep Stenholm, Charles W. - 7/8/2003 [D-TX-17] Rep Hoekstra, Peter - 7/10/2003 [R- MI-2] Rep Brady, Kevin - 7/10/2003 [R- TX-8] Rep Whitfield, Ed - 7/10/2003 [R- KY-1] Rep Hunter, Duncan - 7/10/2003 [R- CA-52] Rep Doolittle, John T. - 7/10/2003 [R- CA-4] Rep Brown, Henry E., Jr. - 7/10/2003 [R- SC-1] Rep Cantor, Eric - 7/10/2003 [R- VA-7] Rep Gingrey, Phil - 7/15/2003 [GA-11] Rep Davis, Lincoln - 7/15/2003 [D-TN-4] Rep Pickering, Charles W. (Chip) - 7/15/2003 [R- MS-3] Rep Wicker, Roger F. - 7/15/2003 [R- MS-1] Rep Taylor, Gene - 7/17/2003 [D-MS-4] Rep Herger, Wally - 7/17/2003 [R- CA-2] Rep Sullivan, John - 7/22/2003 [R- OK-1] Rep Garrett, Scott - 7/22/2003 [R- NJ-5] Rep Tauzin, W. J. (Billy) - 7/22/2003 [R- LA-3] Rep Cubin, Barbara - 7/22/2003 [R- WY] Rep Forbes, J. Randy - 7/23/2003 [R- VA-4] Rep Smith, Christopher H. - 7/23/2003 [R- NJ-4] Rep Schrock, Edward L. - 7/23/2003 [R- VA-2] Rep Pombo, Richard W. - 7/23/2003 [R- CA-11] Rep Hayworth, J. D. - 7/23/2003 [R- AZ-5] Rep Stearns, Cliff - 7/23/2003 [R- FL-6] Rep Cunningham, Randy (Duke) - 7/23/2003 [R- CA-50] Rep Pearce, Stevan - 7/23/2003 [R- NM-2] Rep Hyde, Henry J. - 7/23/2003 [R- IL-6] Rep Barton, Joe - 7/23/2003 [R- TX-6] Rep Boehner, John A. - 7/23/2003 [R- OH-8] Rep Gutknecht, Gil - 7/23/2003 [R- MN-1] Rep Peterson, John E. - 7/23/2003 [R- PA-5] Rep Tiahrt, Todd - 7/23/2003 [R- KS-4] Rep Franks, Trent - 7/23/2003 [R- AZ-2] Rep Carter, John R. - 7/24/2003 [R- TX-31] Rep Emerson, Jo Ann - 7/24/2003 [R- MO-8] Rep Chocola, Chris - 7/24/2003 [R- IN-2] Rep Rohrabacher, Dana - 7/24/2003 [R- CA-46] Rep Crane, Philip M. - 7/24/2003 [R- IL-8] Rep Shuster, Bill - 7/24/2003 [R- PA-9] Rep Sessions, Pete - 7/24/2003 [R- TX-32] Rep Beauprez, Bob - 7/24/2003 [R- CO-7] Rep Ballenger, Cass - 7/25/2003 [R- NC-10] Rep Myrick, Sue - 7/25/2003 [R- NC-9] Rep Toomey, Patrick J. - 7/25/2003 [R- PA-15]

Congressional Directory

David C. Osborne

27 posted on 07/26/2003 5:50:20 PM PDT by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne; *Homosexual Agenda
bttt back atcha. Thanks.

28 posted on 07/26/2003 7:23:43 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
MY RESPONSE TO THOSE FREEPERS WHO OPPOSE HJR 56...

First and foremost this is NOT petty... it is critical in this day and age that we RE-AFFIRM our MORAL foundation. I AGREE with those opponents who are concerned that the U.S. Constitution should not have to be this SPECIFIC, ....HOWEVER, our JUSTICE system has failed us miserably... by equating a union of two people of the same sex to MARIAGE....

this is a HUGE step in destroying the MORAL foundation of our laws.

I believe that by NOT passing this ammendment the effect will be exactly what some opponenets fear will occur if we DO pass it......

IMHO, it will encourage leftists to try to put their own crap into our laws using the judiciary, and taking advantage of its failure to ensure decisions are grounded in MORALITY........

This Ammendment will send the message LOUD AND CLEAR to our JUDICIARY that we WANT them to make decisions that are grounded in MORALITY and if they don't know what that is then WE THE PEOPLE will have to explain it to them in the CONSTITUTION!!!

29 posted on 07/27/2003 7:40:58 AM PDT by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne; *Homosexual Agenda
bumpity ! bumpity !


30 posted on 07/27/2003 8:09:44 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: hattend
I am reading most of these responses in utter shock as I shake my head in disbelief. All of these snide remarks. . .coming from those I am quite sure have not had to deal with the fight for equal rights. Homosexuals do not do anything to your lives! And if you want to get biblical, as quoted by Jesus Christ, "He who has no sin in his life throw the first stone" - Nobody threw the stone. Homosexuals wanting to marry is a good thing! It's monogamy we are talking about here - people who love each other whether is disgusts you or not. You might have your own personal thing I find disgusting, but we shouldn't attack or make fun of one another. We are adults now. Let's put down our stones of hatred, judgement, and hypocricy - and be civil!
32 posted on 10/22/2003 2:13:50 PM PDT by tiffkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tiffkins
Homosexuals do not do anything to your lives!

Scolding rejected. You have no idea how homosexuals have affected my life. No, I won't go into details either.

33 posted on 10/22/2003 2:43:24 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson