Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Games People Play
7/10/03 | William McKinley

Posted on 07/10/2003 3:39:47 PM PDT by William McKinley

Edited on 07/10/2003 5:27:44 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Games People Play

By William McKinley

"If I promise you the Moon and the Stars, Would you believe it?

Games people play in the middle of the night" - Alan Parsons Project, "Games People Play"

The recent fiasco experienced by the New York Times over the creative writing exploits of Jayson Blair should have served as a warning to journalists to be careful over the information they publish. A news outfit depends upon its credibility, just as surely as our society depends upon news reporting in order for people to make judgments over their own governance. Yet it appears that some lessons are not easily learned, as was recently demonstrated by some events which are to this moment still unfolding.

Doug Thompson has been involved in journalism for decades. According to his biography, he has won awards for his reporting and his commentary, and he has worked as Press Secretary for a few members of Congress. He runs a news and commentary webzine called Capitol Hill Blue. Chris Betros is the editor of Japan Today, an English Internet news publication based in Tokyo. Both men find themselves in an uncomfortable position for a journalist, where the story becomes partly about them. I can best describe William Rivers Pitt as a propagandist and a left wing agitator. On July 8th, a sequence of events commenced involving all three that demonstrates that in the aftermath of Jayson Blair, the field of journalism still has not immunized itself from the ministrations of charlatans.

"Things that they say, Honor Brite..."

On July 8th, Capitol Hill Blue published a story titled "White House Admits Bush Lied About Iraqi Nukes". The bold headline was backed by an equally assertive lead-in, which stated "After weeks of denial, the White House Monday finally admitted President Bush lied in his January State of the Union Address when he claimed Iraq had sought significant quantities of uranium in Africa." This assertion went far beyond what other news organizations were reporting, which was that the Bush administration had admitted that the claim made in the State of the Union Address was based on information the President later found to be unreliable. There were other eye-raising details in the story, however.

The article quoted a "CIA advisor" named Terrance J. Wilkinson, claiming he had been present at two White House briefings attended by the President. "The report had already been discredited," the story quoted Wilkinson as stating. "This point was clearly made when the president was in the room during at least two of the briefings" said Wilkinson, who claimed Bush responded in anger. "He said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," the Capitol Hill Blue story continued Wilkinson's quote. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country." Wilkinson claimed to have written "numerous memos" questioning the use of "intelligence information that we knew to be from dubious sources." While American troops continue to search Iraq for a smoking gun regarding weapons of mass destruction, these allegations, if true, would be the smoking gun the left wing of American politics has been searching for in their quest to discredit the Bush administration.

On Free Republic, a website where conservatives dissect and debate the news, some people (including this author) started to question the story. The White House admitted Bush lied? Where could such an admission be found? And who is Terrance J. Wilkinson? Searches using various Internet tools such as Google were coming up empty. Doug Thompson joined in the discussion to defend his work and his publication. "The use of the word 'lied' has also sparked some controversy on the Capitol Hill Blue forum as well. It was my decision to use the word. Wilkinson did not accuse the President of lying. I did, based on information from other sources (who would not go on the record) that Bush was told outright that the information had been discredited before the State of the Union address but that he chose to use it anyway. To me that was a lie and I chose to use it in the headline and the lead of the story." Thompson admitted that he chose such a strong accusation because "I'm mad. Bush didn't have to use a discredited claim to justify the war with Iraq." However, Thompson admitted, "The headline is technically incorrect because the White House made no such admission. I have edited the headline and the lead of the story to reflect that." Thompson republished the article with the word 'lied' changed to 'wrong' in the headline, and the lead-in changed similarly. But what about Terrance J. Wilkinson? Thompson stood by his man. "I've known Terry Wilkinson for 20+ years and his decision to go public was a painful one that I'm sure will bring recriminations."

"Ain't gonna spend the rest of my life, Quietly fading away..."

The genie was out of the bottle at this point. On July 9th, Japan Today published the same exact story as Capitol Hill Blue, verbatim, crediting the story to TruthOut. Within hours, the Google News compilation service had it as the head story in its grouping of the news reports about the White House admission that the Niger intelligence was unreliable. I contacted Japan Today, and in a series of emails with Mr. Betros, I informed him that Capitol Hill Blue had backed off of some of the assertions in the article, and further that there was reason to doubt the existence of the Mr. Wilkinson quoted in the story. This information was news to Mr. Betros, as he was completely unaware of Thompson and of Capitol Hill Blue. He informed me that Japan Today had obtained the story from TruthOut, to which his organization subscribes, and which had presented the story as their own. Betros acted quickly to verify what I was telling him, apparently realizing that the credibility of his news organization could be impacted.

Meanwhile, Thompson was starting to have some doubts of his own. Responding to criticism from readers, he decided to pass along some questions to Wilkinson to start the process of substantiating some of the claims made. To his horror, he started to realize that he had been had. "I tried calling Terry's phone number. I got a recorded message from a wireless phone provider saying the number was no longer in service. I tried a second phone number I had for him. Same result" Thompson related. After checking with some other sources within the administration, the CIA, and Capitol Hill, according to Thompson, he realized "that someone has been running a con on me for 20 some years and I fell for it like a little old lady in a pigeon drop scheme." He published a complete retraction and apology, and contacted a lawyer to assist him in minimizing the damage. For several years, Thompson said, he had been using Wilkinson as an unnamed source in his reporting, sometimes as a single source: "over time, I came to depend on him as a source without additional backup."

"Things that they say, Just don't make it right..."

He was not the only one working to undo things. Betros contacted Thompson, and decided to pull from their publication the story. "We had [been deceived] too," said Betros, "because we subscribe to and publish their stuff from time to time and being over here in Japan, we don't have the resources to check the veracity of articles we take from overseas... I will however think twice before using any more stories after today." He stated that Japan Today would be publishing Thompson's mea culpa.

Despite all the efforts, as of midday July 10th, Google News searches were still turning up the original story's headline and lead in.

How The Google News Search Appeared at 11:00 EDT, July 9

White House admits Bush lied about Iraqi nukes
Japan Today, Japan - 21 hours ago
WASHINGTON — After weeks of denial, the White House Monday finally admitted President
George Bush lied in his January State of the Union Address when he ...

       White House admits mistake about Iraq's nukes - Indian Express
       US denies Blair's claims about Saddam's nukes - Independent Online
       Of Mice and (Con) Men - Democratic Underground

The story also managed to get discussed on CNN. As CNS News noted, Aaron Brown mentioned the news story circulating "that there was at some point a conversation between the president and a CIA consultant where the consultant directly told the president that this African uranium deal was bogus." David Ensor told Brown the story sounded suspect to him, but millions of ears had the seed planted in their heads by the mention. [As an addendum, the Media Research Center points out that Brown's comments were made over four hours after Thompson's retraction.] TruthOut was undoubtedly pleased.

"Games people play in the middle of the night..."

Meanwhile, TruthOut was apparently working to cover some tracks. They removed a copy of the story they had posted on their website, putting in its place at the exact same URL a copy of a Washington Post article. As was captured over at Free Republic, however, their search engine's cache provided evidence that they did have the story up at one time. Later, they published a copy of Thompson's retraction, with the following editorial note provided by William Rivers Pitt:

Yesterday, truthout's lead story carried an article by Capitol Hill Blue that quoted a 'CIA insider.' This insider, a Terrance J. Wilkinson, was reportedly present at two briefings when Bush was informed of, and then dismissed, evidence that his Iraq WMD claims were false. Capitol Hill Blue has run a retraction of that story, which we have printed below. According to Doug Thompson, author of the original story, Terrance J. Wilkinson does not exist, and Thompson has been getting scammed for over 20 years. Something about this story is decidedly strange, but in light of Thompson's retraction, we would be remiss not to run it. I am running down my contacts at CIA and Capitol Hill Blue to find out how all of this took place. We will let you know when we know. - wrp

On TruthOut, Pitt made no mention of how they came to possess the Capitol Hill Blue article to begin with, or why they had sold it to Japan Today without attribution. However, he was not silent on the issue, stating "Japan Today got it from us. I guess they 'stole' it, too since they never asked permission." Something clearly is "decidedly strange" about this story, especially considering that it deals with the run-up to the war with Iraq and since Pitt co-authored a book with former weapons inspector Scott Ritter titled War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You To Know. Ritter was vocal throughout the media attempting to discredit the Bush administration's Iraq positions in the run up to the war.

The fact that Thompson allowed himself to be used to spread false propaganda regarding the administration is somewhat surprising. Earlier this year, Thompson had broken a story prior to the commencement of hostilities in Iraq that he claimed detailed plans by Democrats for undermining the administration after the war:

"Writers and broadcasters friendly to the Democratic cause have already been provided talking points... Capitol Hill Blue obtained a copy of the talking points... The talking points outline a strategy to raise public doubts of the President's real intentions, including: ...--Claiming the Bush administration has "manufactured" evidence against Saddam Hussein and used that evidence to encourage Britain and other allies to join the American fight against Iraq;"

"If I'm telling you the truth right now, Do you believe it..."

So who is Terrance J. Wilkinson, and does he even exist? Doug Thompson claims that the person who identified himself as Wilkinson approached him first when he worked for former Congressman Manuel Lujan of New Mexico. "He seemed to know a lot about the nuclear labs in New Mexico and said he had conducted 'security profiles' for both Los Alamos and Sandia National Labs", Thompson related. Congressman Lujan served on the committee charged with oversight of both labs, and according to Thompson, Wilkinson offered to be involved in assisting them in briefings. "He said he had helped other Republican members of Congress I called some friends in other GOP offices and they said yes, they knew Terry Wilkinson. 'You can trust him, he's one of the good guys,' one chief of staff told me." said Thompson.

If Thompson's claims are accurate, then this paints some disturbing pictures. Which members of Congress were using Wilkinson, and for what purpose? To what information was this person gaining access, and what information was he injecting into the process along the way? At this point, Thompson has become mum, declining to assist me further in finding out more about the identity of Wilkinson, at the advice of his attorney.

The lessons here are plentiful. The news is full of stories, every day, which contain unnamed sources. People gobble up such details at face value, assuming that reporters have exercised due diligence. As Mr. Betros admitted, however, many publications do not have the resources to perform such verifications, and as the Jayson Blair situation demonstrated, those that do can sometimes fail to do so adequately. Publishers are also human, and despite their claims of impartiality bias can impact decisions, as clearly occurred with Mr. Thompson. I wonder how much of Mr. Thompson's anger at the Bush administration was formed by incorrect information being funneled to him by people like the vaporous Mr. Wilkinson. I do not wonder, however, if publication decisions are made, every day, based on information being peddled actively by propagandists with agendas. Clearly, this is a game some people play. We have to take it, or leave it.

William McKinley is a pseudonym. He can be found blogging away on the Internet every day.

TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bbc; capitolhillblue; ccrm; democratscom; dougthompson; fertik; gregpalast; iraq; lytel; niger; nigerflap; observer; palast; pitt; retraction; truthout; uranium; wilkinson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: piasa
Ye gods and little fishes !
81 posted on 07/10/2003 9:29:56 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
2. He exist and is a solo "con" artist.

I like this one better than the "DNC Agent" hypotheses because — not to run down Doug Thompson or anything, but... — who the Hell would invest 20 years building a false identity like this and then spend it on a one-liner in Capitol Hill Blue? It's not worth the candle.

I would sooner believe that Doug Thompson made the guy up. The problem I have with that one is that I don't think these kinds of insider-wannabes are that rare. You mentioned psychosis; I knew a schizophrenic who could and would do this. He would be very convincing at it because he'd believe it himself. This guy had more business cards than Clinton had girlfriends. He owned a catering company, he was an insurance agent, he was an investment banker... I don't even remember them all. It was all BS... the guy was a homeless derelict. But if you didn't know that... he could keep you going for a while.

82 posted on 07/10/2003 9:32:11 PM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
He doesn't exist ... outside of Doug Thompson's tiny mind ! No real journalist is going to accept 'info ", for twenty years, no less, without doing some sort of research on the informant; except a total moron. So either Doug is a lying weasel, who has used this " mysteruous ", long time informant, without any serious scrutiny, or he made him up, in order to, yet once again, attempt to back track on one of his vile, spurious,calumny filled POS against President Bush. The later is the only possible conclusion, for any THINKING person, who is familiar with Doug Thompson.

Okay, I take a part of the above back ... Doug is a liar, a weasel, and a moron !

83 posted on 07/10/2003 9:36:56 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
If 2. is it . He would not have had just one place to spew his information. Others need to be involved.

We also had a source. Young man who got his information from the local coffee shops (just listening in) He was usually quite accurate, before he started embellishing the story. He was smooth enough, could easily have pulled this kind of con. A very likable person. Quite charismatic!

Twenty years is not very long for an on again/off again professional relationship. If it were daily I'd be more apt to question it!
84 posted on 07/10/2003 9:46:40 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Registered; William McKinley

Source With No Name

On the first part of the story
I was looking at all the lies
There were slants and slurs and knocks and zings
There were plants and shills and stings
The first thing I met was a fly with a buzz
And this guy in cheap shades
The heat was hot and the ground was dry
But the air was full of sound

I've been through the newsroom on a source with no name
It felt good to handed my fame
In the newsroom you can remember your name
'Cause ol' C-N-N won't give you no pain..." - PhilDragoo

See post #72.

85 posted on 07/11/2003 1:17:26 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
86 posted on 07/11/2003 1:42:38 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Has anyone found out exactly WHICH six other CHB articles were deleted? What other factoids and propaganda was being pushed in those articles? How far were they disseminated?

Thompson, in his latest Mea Culpa states

"The six stories that quoted this individual as an unnamed source have been removed from our article database. A search of other news sources through the Internet and on Nexis finds no evidence that any of those six stories were published elsewhere. If a further search uncovers evidence of those stories appearing on any web site or in any publication, we will contact that web site or publication and instruct them to remove the stories."

Thompson expects us to believe that these stories were published and had no other impact, anywhere. That does not say much about the impact of Thompson's writing or his website. However, I do not believe that is possible: look at the number of variations his "Wilkinson" story has engendered. His excuse for removing these offending articles smacks more of coverup and revisionism (which he has already demonstrated a penchant for) than a reverence for the truth. Without knowledge of the contents of these six articles, we cannot know the damage that may have been done.

It is possible that the removal of these offending articles is more of an effort by Thompson to hide other "creative" quotations and facts that were in reality the false imaginings of either Wilkinson or Thompson himself.

87 posted on 07/11/2003 2:01:15 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker hit it !
88 posted on 07/11/2003 2:04:31 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Yes, you can reprint these stories in your publication, as long truthout is given full credit as the source.

Hilarious! "Truth"out's name is so fitting... truth is definately OUT at Truthout. Truthout filed off the serial numbers of a counterfeit news story and passed he counterfeit counterfeit off as their own work! This just gets better and better.

Not even John Grisham or Stephen King could have penned fiction as good as this!

89 posted on 07/11/2003 2:12:34 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Here is a little background funding info on Truthout.

Truthout is funded by (or affiliated with) a group called SEE (Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs): Once again, it seems all these liberal activists are doing the 501(c) "non-profit" shuffle. Environmental groups aligned with anti-war groups etc.

Here are some things that make you go HMMMMM;

According to their 2001 form 990, available at and other companies which provide public records, SEE provided funds to Truthout as well as pressing "environmental" causes as:

1.The World Media Alliance

2.Unprecedented-The 2000 presidential election. An independent "film" (I'd have called it-democrats: how to spin like a top - sans vertigo.)

3.A charming little society called the J20 coalition- which is, and I'm quoting from the SEE 990 here, "a determined effort to dog Bush during the tenure of his illegitimate presidency"- Some info on them here:

To see the BBB report on SEE (Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs) AKA- Afghan Women's Mission, American-Soviet Film Initiative-click here:

To see the form 990 on guidestar, click here (you might have to register and use truthout in a keyword search, if link doesn't work):

Some info on a few of SEE's board members:

Steven Sugarman

1. California State University grad -MA in research Psychology. (There is another Steven Sugarman in New Mexico who is known for his litigation on behalf of the eco-nuts. I haven't found any documentation linking the two): (info halfway down page)

2. Max Gail
Possibly the actor/activist: based on info here

3.Andrew Beath
Profile here:

O.K., There's the facts, as far as I can determine, now here's the rant.

I'm no Bushbot. I've certainly disagreed with several of his policies. However, I want to know why in the HELL these non-profits can give unlimited amounts to issue advocacy groups (in my opinion, left-leaning groups like truthout and j20 coalition qualify as issue and candidate advocacy) and not be constrained by CFR and their tax-exempt status. Why does a non-taxpaying organization have more leeway and (less regulation) to spend money in political expression and candidate/election advocacy than an individual taxpayer does? (-PAGING JOHN MCCAIN-)

If I, as an individual were to send money overseas, I’d have to account for it. As far as I can determine, these "non-profits" can engage in political advocacy, ship money from one 501(c) to another (each taking a cut) or even overseas virtually unfettered. I don't know if this inequality violates IRS code, CFR, or even the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but I'm damn sure it is a burden on individual taxpayers and a drag on the US economy.

So the next time a liberal politician whines about "tax-cuts for the rich", and how they want to tax only "ultra-rich" corporations, tell them to start with their OWN DAMN 501(C)"NON PROFIT" CORPORATIONS!

Ranting aside, I hope there is some useful info in here for you.

90 posted on 07/11/2003 2:34:31 AM PDT by Helix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helix
I see there's much to rant about!
91 posted on 07/11/2003 3:20:18 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

No, I have never posted on JT. I did not even realize they have a forum.
92 posted on 07/11/2003 3:37:41 AM PDT by William McKinley (From you, I get opinions. From you, I get the story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
That is the best song parody I have seen in a long, long time.
93 posted on 07/11/2003 3:44:25 AM PDT by William McKinley (From you, I get opinions. From you, I get the story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley; PhilDragoo
Great post.Great song parody.Thank you
94 posted on 07/11/2003 4:31:12 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
I have often said, the best way to get journalism to police itself and take responsibility for their actions, especially when innocent people's lives have been destroyed, due to journalists not doing investigative background on the story prior to running it, is to pass a law.

Corrections to innacuracies must be done in the same manner and venue as the orginal story was run, twice as frequently as the orignal story.

Take for instance the Richard Jewell story. If CNN ran the story during primetime a total of 50 times, and used it as both a lead-in and teaser 30 times, then they should have to show the correction 100 times during primetime and 60 times as a lead-in and teaser.

The journalists would say that it would have a "chilling" effect on breaking news stories, but it would make them think twice about breaking news stories that ruin peoples lives without doing quite a bit of investigative and background work.
95 posted on 07/11/2003 5:22:48 AM PDT by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; RonDog
Phil, you might want to put this on your home page. It is great.

Ron Dog thanks for the ping!
96 posted on 07/11/2003 5:53:22 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Reach out and pound the liberals daily! Become a $/day donor to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Helix
Great data and thanks for posting it and sharing it with us.

One can only wonder how much Opecker/Oil Blood Money from the Opecker Princes and Thugs has gone to these left wing 501C's the past two decades.

The sharing and comingleing of the funds received is another area of danger for the rest of us.
97 posted on 07/11/2003 5:59:50 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Reach out and pound the liberals daily! Become a $/day donor to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Good job!
98 posted on 07/11/2003 6:35:57 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Bush/Cheney in '04 and Tommy Daschole out the door)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I agree - a very REAL danger... one of these days, I'll have to make a flowchart/family tree diagram of all these groups and their incestuous relationships. Might prove interesting...
99 posted on 07/11/2003 6:59:37 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (There's no place like There's no place like There's no place like...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
If and when you do a "Family Tree" of the incestuous relationship of these vile left wing non profits, please ping me. They are the hidden power/funding in keeping the rats in political power.
100 posted on 07/11/2003 7:24:32 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Reach out and pound the liberals daily! Become a $/day donor to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson