Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Boy, those three look happy, don't they?

No matter how Walton tries to spin it, the truth of the matter is obvious: CNN management knows it doesn't have the brainpower in its newsrooms to create better shows than Fox, so they're going to stop trying. Instead, they're going to simply claim to be more elitist: "I really don't think Rolex cares how many watches Timex sells," he said.

Well, that trick won't work either, Jimmy Boy. First of all, Rolex DOES care how many watches Timex sells, because if Timex gets its $20 watch on someone's wrist, that's still one less wrist to sell to. Second, Rolex makes a product WORTH paying more for; CNN creates a free product that is sinking precisely because its quality has fallen through the floor, and talking up its alleged quality will not make said quality magically reappear. And third, The dirty little secret of cable news is that the truly rich viewers, those that make >$150K, have always preferred MSNBC, of all places. The true Rolex owners are ignoring CNN too.

Also, this is the serious nut graph:

While CNN may earn more revenue on a per-subscriber basis, or when lumping together its own ad revenues with those from CNN Headline News and over-the-air local news feeds, Fox News brings in more money on a straight network-to-network comparison, said Roger Domal, Fox News' national sales director.
The only reason CNN earns more on a per-subscriber basis is because Fox launched before digital cable came along, back in the days where the common wisdom was that "there's no more room for any new channels." So the only way Rupert Murdoch was able to get carriage was to pay the cable companies to carry FNC, when usually the cable companies have to pay the networks. Now that Fox is the #1 news channel and the #2 cable network period, those "we pay you" deals are not going to be renewed. When those contracts are up, the local cable companies are going to have to start paying through the nose to carry FNC, and they won't have any choice but to pay(imagine the firestorm if they tried to drop the one conservative channel and alienate 50% of their subscribers!). At that point, FNC will be far more profitable than CNN across the board, and will finally be able to invest like hell in a bigger newsroom, more staffers, more bureaus, perhaps an FNC International ... they will really be able to run CNN into the ground permanently.

If I recall correctly, those FNC contracts with cable companies around the nation start expiring in 2006 (yup, Rupert had to make ten-year deals to get them to make room for Fox News at all). That gives CNN to get their act together ... and instead they're only trending further downward.

Ha ha ha!

1 posted on 07/10/2003 8:20:55 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY
THANK A VET!
MAKE A DONATION TODAY

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER
It' s in the Breaking News Sidebar



2 posted on 07/10/2003 8:24:13 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
"I really don't think Rolex cares how many watches Timex sells," he said.

So CNN considers itself a "serious news" operation.

Were they into these acclaimed serious decisions when they kowtowed to Saddam so they could get air time? When they allowed murders to go unreported so they could curry favor with Saddam? When they allowed a positive image of life in Iraq to be broadcast worldwide so they could curry favor with Saddam?

And all of this admitted to by the head of their own network.

Should Timex care how expensive Rolex claims to be when Timex discovers that Rolex secretly gets their parts from the garbage dump.

3 posted on 07/10/2003 8:27:53 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
C-N-who?
4 posted on 07/10/2003 8:29:31 PM PDT by South40 (Get Right Or Get Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
But they brought in Connie Chung to save CNN from the septic tank... Weren't they pleased with her?
6 posted on 07/10/2003 9:03:20 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("I'm a loving man, but I have a job to do." ~President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.

7 posted on 07/10/2003 9:04:25 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
A friend and I were having lunch a few days ago and were sitting in front of a TV monitor showing CNN. My buddy commented that CNN had more young reporter-ettes than they used to, i.e. they're reducing themselves to using soft porn to gain more viewers. Why don't they just take Howard Stern's lead and hire hot lesbians to make out in front of the camera to gain ratings?
8 posted on 07/10/2003 9:05:43 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
FOX ROXS...TURNER CNN'T
9 posted on 07/10/2003 9:11:49 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
Every single time I sit down with a CNN ad rep, they stack the combined reach of Headline News & CNN in order to have their "bar" raise above FOX News in thier little powerpoint presentations.
11 posted on 07/10/2003 9:15:30 PM PDT by sf4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War

12 posted on 07/10/2003 9:22:10 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
Great review!

Yuk, Paula Zhan.
13 posted on 07/10/2003 9:28:22 PM PDT by Libertina (If speech is restricted because it 's harsh, it isn't free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
.
14 posted on 07/10/2003 9:50:44 PM PDT by jdontom (BacktheBadge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
This old and tired leftist network still thinks their lies are being believed. Paula doesn't look very happy the poor dear. BWA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
16 posted on 07/10/2003 10:11:48 PM PDT by teletech (Have we dug up Saddam yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
Formerly the Clinton News Network

Now the Clueless News Network.

Keep it up, Walton, and you'll be passed by a revived MSNBC.

17 posted on 07/10/2003 11:26:41 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
Walton quickly added that he did not mean to suggest that Fox News was trading on sensationalism. But he seemed to be alluding to Fox in offering a wristwatch analogy to downplay the significance of CNN's No. 2 standing in U.S. cable news ratings. "I really don't think Rolex cares how many watches Timex sells," he said.

Right after they mentioned this on Fox and friends this AM, they went on and on how their ROLEX watches suck and lose several minutes a day. ROFL.

21 posted on 07/11/2003 10:06:55 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
...he cares more about reclaiming CNN's hard-news roots than in regaining ratings supremacy from archrival Fox News Channel. "I don't get caught up in that," newly installed CNN president Jim Walton said

Yeah, right. I'll bet this attitude lasts until Monday.

24 posted on 07/11/2003 11:19:57 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War

25 posted on 07/11/2003 11:20:35 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
I was channel surfing yesterday morning when I stopped at CNN upon hearing "Jack" the old guy during the morning state (paraphrasing)"now all you who call us Clinton News Network I want you to know that all these letters I am getting about Bush lying are all against Bush. I'd read pro Bush letters but there are none". He came to the conclusion that this story will be bigger than Watergate.

Got me laughing because they just don't get it. No Bush supporters WATCH his lousy network so as to write him letters.
26 posted on 07/11/2003 11:28:52 AM PDT by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dont Mention the War
What is a CNN?
27 posted on 07/11/2003 11:31:57 AM PDT by RepPhil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson