Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN exec talks of ratings fight with Fox (Fox Wins)
AP | 7/11/03 | LYNN ELBER

Posted on 07/11/2003 3:54:16 AM PDT by kattracks

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Fox News Channel may have the ratings advantage, but CNN has the prestige and value, CNN's top executive said Thursday.

Jim Walton, president of the CNN News Group, acknowledged that the once-dominant CNN has slipped behind Fox in total viewers and failed to retake the lead during coverage of the Iraq war.

But he said while answering questions from the Television Critics Association that ratings don't tell the whole story.

"I really don't think Rolex cares about how many watches Timex sells," he said.

CNN, an AOL Time Warner company, has a more affluent audience that allows for higher advertising rates and greater shareholder benefit, Walton said.

Fox News Channel spokesman Rob Zimmerman disputed Walton's assertions about CNN's supremacy among moneyed viewers.

Fox can claim more affluent viewers, those making $75,000 a year or more, Zimmerman said. For the first quarter of 2003, FNC in primetime averaged 407,000 viewers age 25 to 54 making $75,000 or more, he said, citing Nielsen Media Research figures. CNN had 159,000, he said.

But that doesn't account for those who tune in but don't stay long enough to be counted in the average ratings, said CNN spokeswoman Christa Robinson. Among that group, CNN has more affluent 25-to-54 viewers, she said, attracting 2 million more viewers than Fox in June.

CNN's goal is to keep audiences tuned in longer, Walton said.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cnn; foxnewsratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
But that doesn't account for those who tune in but don't stay long enough to be counted in the average ratings,...

Which is generally referred to as chanel surfing, which viewers do when they are bored with the content.

1 posted on 07/11/2003 3:54:16 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 07/11/2003 3:56:33 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What a load..
..talk about living in denial.
3 posted on 07/11/2003 3:59:22 AM PDT by evad (Hitlary..lying..It's WHAT she does, it's ALL she does and she WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
CNN is counting people who don't stay tuned in long enough as viewers? It sounds like they are hurting big time!

I noticed there was no mention of the number of people who tuned into FNC but didn't stay long enough to be counted.

4 posted on 07/11/2003 4:10:38 AM PDT by kcordell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
...but CNN has the prestige and value, CNN's top executive said Thursday.

Watched your own programming lately, bud?

5 posted on 07/11/2003 4:13:36 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
Walton went on to explain further that CNN, an AOL Time Warner company, also has a more poorer audience with buck and twisted teeth, that are crosseyed and bow legged, have a low intelligence, and are in desperate need of viagra, which allows for more a wider range of advertisers and greater shareholder benefit.

6 posted on 07/11/2003 4:18:18 AM PDT by BushCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Is Fox beating CNN straight up even though Fox is available in far fewer homes than CNN?
7 posted on 07/11/2003 4:25:09 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
...but CNN has the prestige and value, CNN's top executive said

Propaganda devalues. Truth has value. Prestige follows. People that deliver propaganda are not prestigious. They are a joke. Just ask Baghdad Bob.

8 posted on 07/11/2003 4:27:28 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Dear Mr. Walton, if you'd really like to see what you're up against, where your problems (yes, plural) lay, I cordially invite you to spend a news cycle at my place. I'd be more than happy to show you the error of your ways.
9 posted on 07/11/2003 4:28:32 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Caught on tape at CNN headquarters:

"I could hardly breathe. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, 'What do you mean Fox is ahead of CNN? What are you saying? Why did you lie to me? I was furious and getting more so by the second. He just stood there saying over and over again, 'I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. But anyone knows our viewers are better than Fox viewers. They are smarter and more affluent.”
10 posted on 07/11/2003 4:31:13 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
LOL.
11 posted on 07/11/2003 4:33:57 AM PDT by rep-always
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kcordell
But that doesn't account for those who tune in but don't stay long enough to be counted in the average ratings,...

So, if they don't stay long enough to be counted, how does CNN know they are there?

12 posted on 07/11/2003 4:39:10 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Even worse, if they are not staying, it says there was nothing there to keep them. Like saying we have a great store because we have a lot of people come through the door. They do not stay long and they do not buy anything but we have a lot of people come through the door. (Which will soon be closed.)
13 posted on 07/11/2003 4:48:25 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sounds like a speech you'd give a T-ball team that came in second.
14 posted on 07/11/2003 4:49:51 AM PDT by Feckless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"CNN's goal is to keep audiences tuned in to Fox longer," Walton said.


15 posted on 07/11/2003 4:55:11 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If I can support FR with two kids in college, you can too. Freedom aint free but you can charge it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
He did leave that out. Thanks for bringing it up.
16 posted on 07/11/2003 4:56:05 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If I can support FR with two kids in college, you can too. Freedom aint free but you can charge it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Cuz all his friends at Starbucks told him this.
17 posted on 07/11/2003 4:57:39 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If I can support FR with two kids in college, you can too. Freedom aint free but you can charge it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Rolex doesn't care How many watches Timex sells"

Only if it affect people who would have bought rollexs...

and when leftist propaganda is your product instead of news...the amount of people who don't listen is critical..or he wouldn't be talking about it....

I don't channel surf to CNN..I bulldoze right on past it because I want fact...not their opinions on how things ought to be...

Perhaps if they listed their content as fiction....

they might do better...

more or less an "X" files spin off?
18 posted on 07/11/2003 5:39:20 AM PDT by bullpup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"I really don't think Rolex cares about how many watches Timex sells," he said.

Snobby, isn't he?

19 posted on 07/11/2003 6:20:02 AM PDT by syriacus (Why DO liberals keep describing one other as THOUGHTFUL individuals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Fox can claim more affluent viewers, those making $75,000 a year or more, Zimmerman said....."

Whoa!, watch out or Fox will be accused of being "The Network of The Rich"

20 posted on 07/11/2003 7:43:38 AM PDT by Helms (If California is the Future, I will live in the Past)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson