Posted on 07/11/2003 4:30:10 AM PDT by kattracks
Thanks. I will look for that.
I am livid about the media onslaught today.
The real kind of livid--not the fake Janet Reno kind.
I didn't know the left had a copywrite on the term. In any case I don't consider it derogatory. If I had heard it 12 1/2 years ago in time of war while stationed in the Gulf and serving in the 2ACR, 3rd Squadron, Lighting Troop, I wouldn't have taken it amiss.
At the time this would have been impracticable. But my gripe is not that he didn't remove Klintler's people then, it's that he's promoting them now, post 9/11.
We had some info of Saddam's interest in Uranium in Africa, but not everything we needed to make a case. The UK's MI6 had intercepted 3 phone converstaions between high ranking Iraqi officials and 3 African Countries trying to obtain yellow cake uranium.
From what I have read, Italy is where the forged document came from, it was given to the State Department and somehow got incorperated into a State Dept. report to the U.N., (probably by a Clinton holdover). Meanwhile all this Intel was gathered for the Presidents SOTU address in order to draft a SOTU speech.
A draft was circulated among the high level agencies for review and in that draft was a sentence that sourced that suspect document. George Tenet said that he couldn't sign off on the document they got from Italy and suggested that sentenced be changed.
On assurances that the intel obtained by the MI6 on Iraq's desire to purchase Uranium from these three countries, a modified sentence was used and accepted by all.
All this stuff about the forged document was uncovered before the war started in Iraq. So this is why I think it wasn't brought up, It was just one document of thousands, and after modifying the sentence it wasn't an issue to anyone in the loop.
Here is what I think this is all about. I am starting to believe that this administration released the statement on the forged document to the NYT's and the Wash Post knowing full well that the democrats would smell blood and launch an all out blitz, meanwhile there is evidence of Saddam's weapons programs and his efforts to conceal them ready to be announced next week when Tony Blair and George W. Bush hold their joint press conference. In the end, George W. Bush comes clean about the forged document and the democrats claims of Qugmire, no WMD's, No plans to win the peace, Saddam isn't a threat have ceased, they have been out foxed again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.