Posted on 07/11/2003 10:13:29 AM PDT by Dave S
And the Great Depression continued until WWII. Smoot-Hawley took a correction of a speculative bubble and turned it into a world wide economic disaster. The stock market is a leading indicator. The day after the market crash, the real economy was still in good shape. It starting going south and accelerated as a result of Smoot Hawley which became law eight months later.
I wasnt worried about the US consumer. What did it do the companies that manufactured products for export around the world? Our trading partners didnt just sit there and let us protect our markets to their detriment. They raised tariffs and otherwise restricted their markets killing exports from the US. Without those markets, manufacturing suffered and mass layoffs resulted.
Virtually zip, zero, nothing, nada...
Smoot-Hawley merely raised rates on some items that were already on the tariff list
B> and increased the amount of goods to which no tariffs were applied.And with trade comprising such a small fraction of GNP, any anecdotal effects are insignificant.
If anything, firms engaged in international trade were more affected by the overall decline in economic activity rather than by any specific effect attributable to the tariffs.
Your whiney rant attempting to reverse the roles of cause and effect and exagerate the significance is nothing but pure baloney.
"Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?" Sorry, couldn't help myself...
You do know the differnce between imports and exports? Dont you?
You do know what a trade war is, dont you? Or didnt Pat tell you about those?
When the world is in world-wide recession, the last thing to do is to increase the cost of goods and restrict entry in an attempt to artificially inflate the value of your products. The effect would be a kin to raising income taxes significantly at the beginning of a recession to forstall expected losses of revenue do to the recession. The results are disastrous.
Too bad Perot didn't have this information on hand during the presidential debates in 1992. It could have changed the direction of the campaign.
If that stuff can start being made and offered through 3rd world countries well then...but until then the fact that we can buy a five dollar t-shirt made with cotton so shitty if you hold it up you can see through it and cheap electronic crap just doesn't hold too much weight.
So basically what you are saying is that the parts of the economy that are still showing decent growth, housing and services, are the ones that are important to you. I agree. I spend more on those items than I do on products.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.