Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Niger says Iraq tried to buy uranium (FLASHBACK) (Niger-France-Iraq link?)
AfricaOnLine ^ | Dec. 29, 2002 | AP

Posted on 07/14/2003 3:07:24 PM PDT by FairOpinion

Officials of the central African country of Niger say two decades ago Iraq tried to buy uranium but the request was rebuffed.

NIAMEY: Niger's Prime Minister Hama Hamadou says in the 1980s, Baghdad did not get a favourable response from the then president of Niger, Seyni Kountche.

Last week, the United States accused Iraq of trying to buy uranium from Niger to produce nuclear weapon. Niger is the third leading supplier of mined uranium in the world. It says it sells the mineral mainly to just three countries - France, Japan and Spain.

Enriched uranium is the key element of nuclear weapons.

Two other African countries, Namibia and South Africa, are also among the world's 16 nations with rich uranium supplies.

The World Nuclear Association lists Canada, Australia, Niger, Namibia, Uzbekistan, Russia, Kazakhstan, United States, South Africa, China, Ukraine, Czech Republic, India, France, Romania and Spain as countries that supply uranium.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: africa; france; iraq; niger; saddam; uranium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: John Jorsett
When did this nation stop being Nigeria and start being Niger? And why?

It didn't. Niger and Nigeria are two separate nations; the former was originally a French colony, the latter was part of the British Empire. Both achieved independence in 1960.

21 posted on 07/14/2003 4:52:50 PM PDT by derlauerer (The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice-versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Maybe we should be looking into the Dem financing for French payments as well as Saddam's?
22 posted on 07/15/2003 8:45:42 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (Once a soldier, always a soldier. They enemies of freedom never rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Read yesterdays article in The Telegraph (U.K.). re: French Secret Service and the Uranium.

Niger was a French colony. A French mining company runs the Uranium mines, and that company answers to the French Atomic Energy Commision.

The French Secret Service gave the Iraqi information to the British MI6. Thats why the Brits are standing behind the story.

The rules of cooperation between the French and British stipulate that, in this case, the French must give the MI6 permission to pass on the report. They have not/will not give MI6 permission to pass it to the CIA. So CIA has no official paper report to back up the claim of the Iraqi attempt to buy the uranium, only hearsay. So, CIA can't stand behind the story - officially. But everyone knows what really happened.

IMO, it's the French again. They are sitting back and laughing at the media giving it good to G.W.

23 posted on 07/15/2003 9:16:34 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Only1choice____Freedom; Grampa Dave; Liz; MizSterious; PhiKapMom; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Maybe we should be looking into the Dem financing for French payments as well as Saddam's?

Good question, Ketchup Boy Kerry has particularly Francophile tendencies.

Everybody check out muleskinner's post #23, it's a great one.

24 posted on 07/15/2003 10:09:14 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (Dues paying member of the vast right wing conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
The Brits still insist the story is true.

If it is and it is verified, GW will have to retract his retraction.

More ammo?
25 posted on 07/15/2003 10:52:38 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (Once a soldier, always a soldier. They enemies of freedom never rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: FairOpinion
...and Jacque Penne's?
27 posted on 07/15/2003 11:26:18 AM PDT by Hatteras (The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Another excellent article full of facts and information:

"Let them eat yellowcake"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/946586/posts
28 posted on 07/15/2003 11:39:49 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
"Read yesterdays article in The Telegraph (U.K.). re: French Secret Service and the Uranium."

---


Excellent article.
Thanks for mentioning it.

Here is the link and copy of the article for others who missed it:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$NQRIUVE5011OJQFIQMGSFFOAVCBQWIV0?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F07%2F14%2Fwdoss114.xml


French secret service 'kept CIA in the dark over Iraq and uranium'
By Michael Smith, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 14/07/2003)


The French secret service is believed to have refused to allow MI6 to give the Americans "credible" intelligence showing that Iraq was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger, US intelligence sources said yesterday.

MI6 had more than one "different and credible" piece of intelligence to show that Iraq was attempting to buy the ore, known as yellowcake, British officials insisted. But it was given to them by at least one and possibly two intelligence services and, under the rules governing cooperation, it could not be shared with anyone else without the originator's permission.

US intelligence sources believe that the most likely source of the MI6 intelligence was the French secret service, the DGSE. Niger is a former French colony and its uranium mines are run by a French company that comes under the control of the French Atomic Energy Commission.

A further factor in the refusal to hand over the information might have been concern that the US administration's willingness to publicise intelligence might lead to sources being inadvertently disclosed.

US sources also point out that the French government was vehemently opposed to the war with Iraq and so suggest that it would have been instinctively against the idea of passing on the intelligence.

British sources yesterday dismissed suggestions of a row between MI6 and the CIA on the issue. However, they admitted being surprised that George Tenet, the CIA director, had apologised to President George W Bush for allowing him to cite the British government and its claim that Saddam had sought to acquire uranium from Africa in his State of the Union speech last October.

The apology follows the International Atomic Energy Authority's dismissal of documents given to it by the CIA, which purported to prove the link, as fakes.

Those documents have been widely identified with last September's British dossier on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, which said Saddam Hussein was trying to buy uranium ore from an unnamed country in Africa.

British officials admitted that the country was Niger but insisted that the intelligence behind it was genuine and had nothing to do with the fake documents. It was convincing and they were sticking with it, the officials said.

They dismissed a report from a former US diplomat who was sent to Niger to investigate the claims and rejected them. "He seems to have asked a few people if it was true and when they said 'no' he accepted it all," one official said. "We see no reason at all to change our assessment."

The fake documents were not behind that assessment and were not seen by MI6 until after they were denounced by the IAEA. If MI6 had seen them earlier, it would have immediately advised the Americans that they were fakes.

There had been a number of reports in America in particular suggesting that the fake documents - which came from another intelligence source - were passed on via MI6, the officials said. But this was not true.

"What they can't accuse MI6 of doing is passing anything on this to the CIA because it didn't have the fake documents and it was not allowed to pass on the intelligence it did have to anyone else."


Michael Smith's new book The Spying Game, which examines the intelligence behind the September dossier, is published by Politico's.


29 posted on 07/15/2003 11:44:28 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The French apparently did share the info with the British, just not with us.
30 posted on 07/15/2003 2:09:43 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson