[McGavin999]

No, the government "offing" him would be too obvious. They wouldn't do it, especially at this point in time because they would be the first to be suspected. Besides, they have the means to have done it in such a way that nobody would/could ever suspect. i.e. an accident, a plane crash, etc. The timing on this is too bad. They would have done something BEFORE the testimony. No, this was done at this time in this way to cast suspicion on the government.

[Betty Jo]

Come on Freepers, I've already told you on another thread.

Bin Laden and/or Saddam killed him.

Just like Don Wiley.

Wiley was killed because he would be too good at fighting SARS and the other goodies yet to get us, and now Kelly because his death causes such a ruckus,raises uneasiness,soon to be terror,and just for plain old revenge.

Saddam and Binny have a sense of humor.

Watching us and our reactions is fun to them.

At one time, Kelly knew all that he could know given the restraints,about Saddams bios.

Now he knows nothing.

Dead bioweapon experts cant talk.

[AntiGuv]

No, the government "offing" him would be too obvious. They wouldn't do it, especially at this point in time because they would be the first to be suspected.

So what? What if they are the first to be suspected (which is and was inevitable)? What is anyone gonna do about it?

If the motives were strong enough, they'd off him and suspicions be damned... Your remarks indicate that you have prejudged what it was that may've made him a threat to someone or other. Why are you so sure you know?