The Letter the Wall Street Journal Refused to Run (in defense of Ann Coulter)

Anncoulter.org ^ | 07-30-03 | M. Stanton Evans

[Those_Crazy_Liberals]

Don't forget, Ms. Rabinowitz makes her living claiming people were falsely accused.

[FreedomPoster]

M. Stanton Evans is *the* expert in this particular area. Unless the WSJ is totally asleep at the wheel, not running this letter was a deliberate act, the ramifications of which should be carefully considered by conservatives.

[austinTparty]

Perhaps the WSJ does not view everything they write through the prism of Ms. Coulter? The cult status being assigned to her by some is a bit disquieting. Not publishing a letter is not an act of war, for crying out loud, and seeing that as a "call to arms" by "conservatives" (as though all conservatives must gravitate in group-think) is more than overkill. If you agree with the book, then show your support through the marketplace, and buy a dozen copies to give as gifts. Casting everything as a crisis diminishes the impact of serious issues.

[FreedomPoster]

When you print demonstrable inaccuraccies that indicate that perhaps the commentator didn't even read the book being discussed, and then won't print a rebuttal by a (the?) top acknowledged expert in the field, it makes it look like you're trying to sweep things under the rug. Go read the commendary on the FR Rabinowitz thread that deconstructs her column.

FreeRepublic is playing the "Bill O'Reilly" role here and not is not letting this be swept under the rug.

[Gracey]

... conservative women are beautiful, feminine, and articulate. Have you noticed that the Left wing women are ugly, shrill, and hysterical?

LOL. You're analysis applies most of the time.

"Our" women are LADIES and Feminine. The Leftie Women are mostly "neutered" ballsy, bossy, pushy, power hungry, anti-men, anti-American, and generally not cute.

[Deb]

Wow! Irony!