If you had some proof, like a Novemeber 2002 blowout loss, or massive tanking in the polls that showed Bush wildly unpopular, then I maybe think you know what you are talking about.You've confused what animates you with what everyone else OUGHT to be focusing on, whence your anger and outrage.
Would you say you're an ideologue?
129 posted on 08/01/2003 7:52 PM PDT by habs4ever
I've never seen the anger and outrage tags thrown around more than by the Bush supporters. If you disagree with Bush you have to be angry. Okay let's say I am.
What has my opinion got to do with this? Seriously.
Is big government spending and blown out budgets conservative?
Is support for a socialist education system, in fact a 70% increase in their budget, conservative?
Is support for open borders against our current laws and ideas of fair and equitable global immigration to the US, conservative?
Is allowing immigration from terrorists states to continue, conservative?
Is demanding Israel to aquiese, compromise and submit to terrorist demands conservative?
Is reinforcing some of Clinton's land grabs, conservative?
I could go on, but why should I have to? I am willing to congratulate Bush on the WoT. You aren't even able to take an honest look at these things and tell me they trouble you. Instead I'm supposed to be an angry ideologue for having the timerity to mention this. It doesn't make any difference to you that much of what Bush is doing goes against decades of conservative dogma. Yikes. Perhaps you can throw out a few more choice insults.