Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critics slam Davis over new 'cross-dresser' law
WND ^ | August 4, 2003

Posted on 08/04/2003 6:29:34 PM PDT by hotpotato

California Gov. Gray Davis added fuel to his opponents' recall fire by signing a controversial bill that authorizes fines of up to $150,000 for companies or nonprofit groups, such as the Boy Scouts, that discriminate against cross-dressers, transsexuals or drag queens.

The governor signed the measure Saturday along with the $71.1 billion budget for fiscal year 2003-4. The move fell under the radar screens of most California media outlets.

The law, which will take effect Jan. 1, 2004, adds "gender identity or expression" to the characteristics protected under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act and specifically protects residents whose "perceived gender characteristics are different from those traditionally associated with the individual's sex at birth."

The Assembly approved the bill in April by a vote of 41 to 34, the minimum needed to pass. The state Senate, led by Democrats, followed suit earlier this month with a vote of 23 to 11.

The new law, which provides an exemption for religious groups, makes California the fourth state to bar discrimination on the basis of "perceived gender," behind New Mexico, Rhode Island and Minnesota.

Homosexual-rights advocates hail the law as a victory that's been a long time in coming.

"It's a very big issue for the LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] community in California," Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, told the Associated Press. "It's something we've been working on for three years."

The measure, titled AB 196, was one of a package proposed this year by the five-member Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Caucus. Earlier this year, the state Assembly passed a bill that would award virtually all the rights of marriage to homosexual "domestic partners." The Senate is expected to take it up next month.

"Having a law that specifically states who's protected makes it clear to employers that the majority of people in California want transgender people to be able to work in a nondiscriminatory environment," said Chris Daley, co-director of the Transgender Law Center in San Francisco.

Arguing for its necessity, the bill's sponsor, Assemblyman Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, cites a 1999 study by the San Francisco Department of Public Health indicating the city's transgender population had a 70 percent unemployment rate.

"We must do everything in our power to protect such fundamental human rights," he said.

Opponents call the move bad for business. Employer groups such as the California Chamber of Commerce and the California Manufacturers and Technology Association warn the law's overly subjective definitions will spawn frivolous lawsuits. Just about any comment or action between workers could be grounds for a lawsuit, they contend.

Assemblyman Dennis Mountjoy of Monrovia was one of several members who spoke about how the measure harms California businesses during debate in the Assembly.

"If I have a Christian bookstore, how could I possibly follow this law?" he asked. "How could I possibly have an employee that's here today in a dress, tomorrow may come in a suit, and then stay in a dress? How can I possibly employ this employee and still have the Christian bookstore and live by my faith?"

Randy Thomasson, executive director of Campaign for California Families, a statewide family issues leadership organization, describes the law as "attacking persons of conscience."

"Average people think it's outrageous to force the sex-change lifestyle upon businesses and Boy Scouts. Gray Davis has apparently lost his senses," he said. "With his signature on AB 196, Davis has declared war on Californians who object to sex-change operations."

As WorldNetDaily reported, Davis' signature will likely motivate opponents to turn out in greater numbers for the Oct. 7 recall vote.

Less than a year into his second term, Davis is grappling with a staggering deficit projected at more than $38 billion and rock-bottom approval ratings. He becomes the first sitting governor in the history of California and only the second in U.S. history to face a recall election.

The governor derides the drive to oust him as "a hostile takeover by the right," and allies have said they expect to spend $15 million to $20 million to keep him in office.

With the Aug. 9 filing deadline looming, hundreds of people – from activists and filmmakers to a comedian and billboard queen – have filed to have their names added to the ballot. Self-described "smut peddler" Larry Flynt joined the dozens who have paid the $3,500 filing fee.

U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, who bankrolled the recall signature-gathering recall effort with $1.7 million of his own money – is the only declared Republican in the race. Failed gubernatorial candidate Bill Simon and state Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks are expected to run. Others contemplating a run are state Sen. Bruce McPherson, R-Santa Cruz, actor Arnold Schwarzenegger and controversial, nationally syndicated radio talk-show host Michael Savage.

Opponents of the "cross-dresser bill" plan to hold a news tomorrow at 10:30 a.m. at the State Treasurer's Building in Sacramento to highlight the law's detrimental effect on business. Speakers will include Thomasson and other pro-family leaders, including local ministers representing black, white and Latino voters.

"By supporting the transsexual agenda that hurts everyone else, Gray Davis has earned his recall," said Thomasson. "The in-your-face transsexual agenda makes voters very angry. ... Gray Davis tried to hide his actions by signing this radical sex-change bill under cover of the budget, but he won't get away with it."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; california; crossdresser; davis; grayslavish; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexualsaretrash; pandering2theleft; prisoners; signed; smellthedesperation; transexual; transgender; transsexual
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
Just... what can you say. Cross-dressing is a sexual fetish. The California governor has just signed into legislation a bill which opens the door for voyeurism in women's restrooms in public and work and school. If your daughter's heterosexual teacher decides he wants to start using the girls' restroom, he can just show up in drag. Think I'm kidding? It's already happening.
1 posted on 08/04/2003 6:29:35 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
Next people will be forced to hire necrophiliacs, Dominatrix, beastiality types, and worse just because Gay Dufus says so.
Unless he's recalled first before that idea bubbles up from his backside.
2 posted on 08/04/2003 6:33:20 PM PDT by Darksheare ("I didn't say it wouldn't burn, I said it wouldn't hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
Sounds like a great scam for getting that job or that promotion. Just toss on something slinky with rhinestones, do up the hair, apply some make-up and with those spike heels just walk into HR and demand whatever with the threat of a lawsuit for discrimination.
3 posted on 08/04/2003 6:36:00 PM PDT by Dr Warmoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
Gee........the sooner the big one hits California, the sooner sanity will return to the new west coast...Nevada.
4 posted on 08/04/2003 6:38:45 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato; Ernest_at_the_Beach
FGS! Pinging Ernest! Time to alert the troops!
5 posted on 08/04/2003 6:38:55 PM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
This bill is sick, and is just another reason why democrats are scum, totally committed to the destruction of US institutions and way of life. They have been since the sixties, and it's exactly that counterculture generation that is now running many local and state governments.
6 posted on 08/04/2003 6:39:24 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Yep,the sick basterds all belong in the loony bin.
7 posted on 08/04/2003 6:43:08 PM PDT by JOHANNES801
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Unless he's recalled first before that idea bubbles up from his backside

And only then so long as the "replacement" isn't equally or more extreme. It's a very real possibility that this once glorious recall could become the beginning of a new nightmare. Too many "bafoon" candidates.

8 posted on 08/04/2003 6:43:19 PM PDT by YoungKentuckyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx; *calgov2002; fooman; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; NormsRevenge; snopercod; ...
My gracious, what did that dumb A*** do now?

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



9 posted on 08/04/2003 6:45:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
The bill was signed as a favor to the California AG who indentified by a SoCal police agency as a CD years ago when the then young politico ran with the Hollywood crowd.
10 posted on 08/04/2003 6:46:08 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Good thing I have no intention of advertising for a room-mate.After all, I just might "discriminate" against a protected weirdo class!

Thank goodness I dont own my own business!What if I needed to hire an employee to "represent" my company and work with the in-place team?
But then, I dont live in California....
11 posted on 08/04/2003 6:46:34 PM PDT by sarasmom (Punish France, Ignore Germany, Forgive Russia. Canada-well they are mostly French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Isn't this something? This desperate and dispicable monster is pulling-out all stops!

It's going to be a big night in Hillcrest tonight.
12 posted on 08/04/2003 6:48:01 PM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Not a bill anymore...

It's a law. One more reason to boycott California.
13 posted on 08/04/2003 6:48:13 PM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
There is a lot of ignorance out there about transgenderism and transsexualism and it's because logical debate is not allowed. Anyone questioning the validity of claims made about TG, TS, etc., are labeled as hate mongering or unPC, etc. People have become complacent and gullible about what this really is and accept the words of Oprah and other talkshow hosts who promote this as a gender identity problem needing tolerance. There is no empirical data to support the bogus theories being pushed onto the public about the cause of this "condition." However, if the TG/TS community can get the public to buy into their "physciolgically caused predicament," then the world is their candy store (as well as women's restrooms).

Gray Davis has sold out the citizens of the state of California AGAIN.
14 posted on 08/04/2003 6:49:57 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
Just one more reason to recall Davis and vote for a replacement who will get the state's priorities straight, like Tom McClintock.
15 posted on 08/04/2003 6:50:12 PM PDT by Commander8 (Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Great post. The Dems have transformed deviancy into a human rights issue.
16 posted on 08/04/2003 6:54:15 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
I forgot to add the desire for the TG/TS to have access to opposite gender gyms and lockerrooms.

Assemblyman Mark Leno, the bill's sponsor, stated in an interview when asked about restrooms that the bill does not deal with the separate restroom issues. In other words, there will be lawsuits that businesses will now have to deal with coming from TGs that want to use the opposite-gender restroom and those with the appropriate XX, XY chromosomes suing for privacy. The people of California have no idea what's about to hit them.
17 posted on 08/04/2003 6:59:12 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
You've hit the nail on the head.
18 posted on 08/04/2003 6:59:58 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
California AG who indentified by a SoCal police agency as a CD years ago

Got any photos? They could be useful in derailing his position anytime he showed up in public. We could pass 'em out in the audience.

19 posted on 08/04/2003 7:02:43 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Gawd help us all.
20 posted on 08/04/2003 7:05:08 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson