Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9/11: The Pakistan Connection
Sify ^ | Wilson John

Posted on 08/07/2003 2:28:15 PM PDT by swarthyguy

On July 31, 2003, John S Pistole, Deputy Assistant Director, Counter-terrorism Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, testified before the US Senate Committee on Government Affairs on 'Terrorism Financing: Origination, Organisation and Prevention'. One of the key findings he referred to was the link between the terrorists involved in the September 11, 2001 attacks and Pakistan. Though Pistole chose not to divulge too many details of the FBI investigations, his conclusions were revealing. "A continuing investigation," said Pistole, "in coordination with the PENTTBOMB Team has traced the origin of the funding of 9/11 back to financial accounts in Pakistan where high-ranking and well-known Al Qaeda operatives played a major role in moving the money forward, eventually into the hands of the hijackers located in the US ... The financial investigation also provided the first links between Ramzi Binalshibh and the 9/11 operations."

As expected, the FBI testimony provoked media speculation across the globe, especially in India where it was widely believed that terrorist elements within Pakistan, in collaboration with the ISI and the Pakistani Army, were deeply involved in 9/11 attacks. Interestingly, these facts were known to the American and Indian intelligence agencies long before the FBI or the Senate investigations into 9/11 could even begin. The Pioneer had traced several of these links in early 2002, working solely on the information available in the public domain.

Following the links more closely, I had discovered several connections that existed between the 9/11 operatives and Pakistan, which was developed into a report for the Observer Research Foundation in December last. This report, soon to be released, detailed the movements of three individuals closely involved in planning the terrorist attack on the US.

Said Bahaji, a German of Moroccan origin, was one of them. He flew into Karachi's Qaid-e-Azam International Airport on a Turkish Airlines flight from Istanbul a week before September 11, 2001. There were four other men with him. Three of them took up a room (No 318) at Hotel Embassy. The two others stayed at a house in Gulshan-e-Iqbal, a posh colony in Karachi. One of them was Ramzi Binalshibh, a key figure in the entire 9/11 plot.

Bahaji and his room-mates checked out of the hotel the next day, after the former had called a Hamburg number and e-mailed a note to his 21-year old wife, Nese, in Hamburg. Bahaji took a Pakistan Airlines flight to Quetta and, since then, has been on the Most Wanted List of the CIA and FBI. Bahaji was one of the anonymous warriors of the Al Qaeda. Twenty-six-year-old Bahaji was fluent in four languages, had been in the German Army for a year and pursued a course in Computer Science at Hamburg's Technical University. He was a close associate of Mohammad Atta, the leader of the 9/11 pack of hijackers. Bahaji was one of the coordinators, facilitating false ID papers, cash, visas and transport. He networked with other Al Qaeda cells across the world to finetune the operations.

Though the CIA and the FBI have given much weight to the Al Qaeda's secret meeting at a condominium outside Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where, it is said, the final plans for the hijack attack were formulated, not much attention has been paid to the meeting at Hotel Embassy in Karachi a week before the attack. It was, in all probability, a meeting to tie up loose ends before the countdown to the attack, especially after the arrest of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker who was caught on suspicion on August 16, 2001, by the US authorities.

Moussaoui was one of the key planners of 9/11. What is intriguing is the identity of the people who checked into Hotel Embassy with Bahaji. According to the German authorities, Bahaji's three companions were Mohammad Sarwar Joia alias Patrick Joia, Abdellah Hosayni and Ammar Moula. These were fake identities. While there is information that Patrick left Karachi within a month of 9/11, Hosayni and Moula disappeared into Karachi.

Hotel Embassy had another mysterious guest during the same time Bahaji and his friends were in: An Algerian identified as Mohammed Belfatmi who too had come from Istanbul. He stayed at a room below Bahaji's and checked out soon after Bahaji and his room-mates left the hotel. Belfatmi is yet to be caught.

On September 11, 2001, a few hours before the World Trade Centre twin towers were attacked in New York, one Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi landed in Karachi. A Saudi national, Hawsawi was the finance manager of the 9/11 operations. There is clear evidence that he moved several thousand dollars from a Standard Chartered Bank account in the UAE to Florida's SunTrust account operated by Atta and others. Working from Dubai, he had couriered ATM and credit cards to Atta and his group in the US for paying for flight training schools, buying simulators and equipment like the Global Positioning System, and for booking tickets on flights taking off from various destinations on September 11.

One man who coordinated all these activities from Karachi was Ramzi Binalshibh. Ramzi was a close associate of Atta and Bahaji and coordinated financial transactions with Hawsawi. A nephew of Khaled Mohammed Sheikh (one of the operations managers of the Al Qaeda who first conceived the idea of hijacking aircraft and dive-bombing them into tall buildings), he was a member of Atta's Hamburg cell and the only one to attend the meetings at Kuala Lumpur in January 2000 and Spain in July 2001. It was originally planned Ramzi would be a part of the Atta team, but he could not get a visa to enter the US. His visa application was rejected four times. Ramzi was then designated as coordinator and sent to Karachi, where he activated a dormant Al Qaeda cell with the help of the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and other sectarian and terrorist groups operating in Pakistan.

This Karachi cell had two primary objectives: To coordinate the September 11 attack and to figure out an escape plan after it. Besides coordinating the pre-9/11 activities involving Bahaji and his room-mates, (Atta and others too had passed through Karachi in December 1999 en route to training camps in Afghanistan), the Karachi cell was busy finding sources of funds for the operations. One of the fund raisers was Syed Omar Sheikh, the main accused in the Daniel Pearl murder case and one of the figureheads in the Jaish-e-Mohammed, the banned terrorist organisation responsible for several terrorist attacks in Kashmir and other areas in India.

Sheikh used his contact in India, Aftab Ansari, a don from Mumbai, to collect funds. Ansari used his henchman, Asif Reza Khan, to kidnap a Kolkata tycoon, Partho Pratim Burman, who paid several crores for his release. From that booty, about $ 100,000 was wired to Atta. Atta returned $ 15,600 through hawala channels a few days before he dive-bombed the WTC towers in Manhattan. The money was wired to a bank in Karachi, from where it was withdrawn through three ATM withdrawals within two days of the attack. The person who withdrew the money was Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi.

Could these operations have been carried out without the knowledge of the omnipresent ISI, which surely must have kept its chief informed about the activities? Certainly, the answer is no. Simply because all the above links were drawn from news reports in the Pakistani media. It would, therefore, be naive to believe that the ISI and President Pervez Musharraf were not aware of the activities of the 9/11 plotters in Pakistan, and this is what the FBI and the CIA would not like to divulge.

At least for the moment.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911report; alqaeda; alqaedapakistan; jihad; moneytrail; moussaoui; pakistani; prequel; southasia; southasialist; swarthyguy

1 posted on 08/07/2003 2:28:15 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; aristeides; Shermy; keri; Betty Jo; happygrl; RussianConservative; belmont_mark
A little bit more.
2 posted on 08/07/2003 2:29:24 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *southasia_list
3 posted on 08/07/2003 2:41:59 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Thanks. I am going through the Joint Inquiry Report and plugging in the dedacted stuff.
4 posted on 08/07/2003 7:13:37 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Betty Jo
Let us know when you complete it.
6 posted on 08/08/2003 10:39:04 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo; belmont_mark
From here

The recently-released report of the joint US Congressional Committee, which had enquired into the performance of the intelligence agencies prior to 9/11, has collated from the files of the various agencies of the US intelligence community information having a bearing on 9/11, which was received before 9/11. The more important items from this collation are the following:

* June 1998: "Osama bin Laden is planning attacks in the US. Plans are to attack in New York and Washington. Information mentions an attack in Washington probably against public places. He probably places a high priority on conducting attacks in the US."

* September 1998: " Osama bin Laden's next target would possibly involve flying an explosive laden aircraft into a US airport and detonating it."
* October 1998: "Al Qaeda is trying to establish an operative cell within the continental United States to strike at the heart of US interests."

* December 1998: "Plans to hijack US aircraft proceeding well. Two individuals had successfully evaded check-points in dry run at NY airport."

* Spring 1999:" bin Laden planned an attack on a government facility in Washington DC."

* August 1999: "bin Laden's organisation has decided to target the US Secretary of State, Secretary of Defence, and DCI (Director, Central Intelligence)."

* September 1999:" bin Laden and others were planning a terrorist act in the United States, possibly against specific landmarks in California and New York city."

* March,2000: "The community obtained information regarding the types of targets that operatives in bin Laden's network might strike. The Statue of Liberty was specifically mentioned, as were skyscrapers, ports, airports and nuclear power plants."

* March, 2000: " bin Laden was planning attacks in specific West Coast areas."

* April, 2001: "The community obtained information from a source with terrorist connections who speculated that bin Laden was interested in commercial pilots as potential terrorists. The source warned that the United States should not focus only on Embassy bombings, that terrorists sought "spectacular and traumatic" attacks and that the first World Trade Center bombing would be the type of attack that would be appealing. The source did not mention a time-frame for an attack. Because the source was offering personal speculation and not hard information, the information was not disseminated within the intelligence community." (My comment: An FBI officer in Arizona had reportedly sent a memo to the FBI headquarters expressing concern over many Arabs undergoing flying training in the US, but the memo did not receive adequate attention)

2. What attention these reports received from the community and the policy-makers and what action was taken? To cite the observations of the committee:

* "The joint enquiry did not find any comprehensive intelligence community list of bin Laden-related threats to the United States that was prepared and presented to the policy makers before September 11. Such a compilation might have highlighted the volume of information the community had acquired about bin Laden's intention to strike inside the United States."

Read it and weep.
7 posted on 08/08/2003 10:59:24 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
8 posted on 08/08/2003 11:52:42 AM PDT by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Bump for later.
9 posted on 08/08/2003 12:13:21 PM PDT by Bayou City
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
weeping and reading!
10 posted on 08/08/2003 12:13:54 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I have been weaping ever since my government gave India the cold shoulder and in spite of substantial evidence, well prior to 9/11, that Pakistan were the chief nation state regional conduit into Al Qaida and Taliban, we embraced Pakistan believing we needed Pakistani bases. As it turned out, we made very little actual use of Pakistan during the Afghanistan campaign so there goes that argument. Then, there are those who say that Pakistan are helping us round up AQ operatives. Sure, they throw us an occassional crumb but yet they hide OBL and allow a safe zone inside their borders. They relocated a number of their nuclear scientists to Myanmar, not only to keep them from talking to the CIA, but also, how convenient, to proliferate WMDs to Myanmar thereby joining the party that Russia and the PRC already started there. It's all about strategic encirclement of India, pushing ASEAN even further away from the West and toward the PRC and Russia, and, setting things up for a surprise attack ala Pearl Harbor on Diego Garcia as a prelude to the final push to exclude Western Interests and the interests of Western allies (such as Japan) entirely from continental Asia. How we failed to see all this and failed to see that even at their friendliest the regime in Islamabad are true backstabbers, is beyond my Clausewitzian comprehension. Some may call me a zero sum Neandarthal, but mark my words our series of ambiguous positions and failure to see the anti Western Bloc for the menace it truly is shall go down in the archives as the ultimate strategic blunder.
11 posted on 08/08/2003 1:21:17 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
What? ThePakistanissupportTerrorism?? No way!!! Don't they follow the religion of peace?????????
12 posted on 08/08/2003 1:27:33 PM PDT by Cronos (Bush 2004 (Reagan waz best, but Dubya's close!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
I'm shocked I tell you, shocked! Didn't we give them $3 billion in tax dollars and they still support alQ????
13 posted on 08/08/2003 1:29:49 PM PDT by Cronos (Moon God loons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
Won't be any joy in "told u so".
14 posted on 08/08/2003 2:02:20 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
No doubt! ;)
15 posted on 08/08/2003 2:27:26 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare; ganeshpuri89; Dog; Coop; AM2000; Dog Gone
One for the history files.
16 posted on 08/11/2003 2:03:11 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign; lugsoul; river rat; Saberwielder; areafiftyone; Gengis Khan

Here's an oldie but goodie!

17 posted on 07/19/2005 8:58:45 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy; DevSix

Aww !...its just those darn Indian propagandists buggering up the lives of innocent Pakis. Mushy is doing so much for GWOT, more than India.....donchya know?


18 posted on 07/19/2005 10:42:45 AM PDT by Gengis Khan (Since light travels faster than sound, people appear bright until u hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson