Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Spokesman Warns Of 'Real Bullets' Against Arnold; Opponents Race To Find 'Grope Tapes'
Drudge ^ | Aug 10, 2003 | Drudge

Posted on 08/10/2003 4:31:13 PM PDT by John Jorsett

California Democratic Party Spokesman Bob Mulholland this weekend warned Arnold Schwarzenegger that "real bullets" will be coming his way during his campaign to be governor, just as opponants race to find alleged videos which claim to show the movie star groping women... Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: California
KEYWORDS: allornothinglosers; arnoldwillwin; calgov2002; celebritycult; clintonlegacy; deaththreats; goarnoldgo; itsjustsex; keysters; losers4mcclintock; mcclintockistas; totalrecall; vote4arnold; winners4arnold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-269 next last
To: PhiKapMom
Maybe the Dems are scoping out for an OKC Bombing AGAIN!!
151 posted on 08/10/2003 7:50:10 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus
f you actually believe that Califoria can go from LIBERAL to CoNSERVATIVE without electing a Liberal Republican, you are Calif. dreaming!!! Wish it were sao....it AIN'T.

Arnold will make it "cool" to vote Republican!!

152 posted on 08/10/2003 7:55:02 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett; Uncle Hal; CHUCKfromCAL; ChocChipCookie; BarbaraS.; jimbo123; Howlin; onyx; ...
Anyone know if Mulholland is the same lunatic RAT party spokesman that was on Rita Cosby's Fox show last night discussing Arnold? Whoever that guy was, he was acting downright psychopathic. He was blatantly spewing the same old talking points that the *mainstream news media* have already reported over and over would be tried (so nobody watching could possibly have fallen for it): It's all a VRWC, a FAR-right plot at that, the election will cost about $14 trillion to hold, blah blah blah ... and he was acting out the utter stereotype - a self-parody, really - of the the angry, bitter, venomous subhuman RAT. The best was right at the end as Rita was about to move on to another story, and he suddenly screamed "RECALL JEB BUSH!" at the last possible moment before his signal was cut off. Even Rita Cosby was left laughing at him after that crazed non sequitur. (The whole time, of course, the GOP guest was calm and rational, letting the RAT hang himself with his own rope.)

If that was Mulholland, I'd like to know. And if anyone can find a transcript of that interview (again, it was just last night on "The Big Story with Rita Cosby,") it would prove very illuminating to many.

153 posted on 08/10/2003 7:55:20 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
That was Bob Mulholland!
154 posted on 08/10/2003 7:56:29 PM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Was this before he married Maria? My guess is that he's totally faithful AFTER courting Maria. the video would have been shown by now.
155 posted on 08/10/2003 7:57:36 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Anold has a Master's Degree in Business which is probably waaaaay more experience than Gray-out has.
156 posted on 08/10/2003 8:00:16 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

Comment #157 Removed by Moderator

To: onyx
That was Bob Mulholland!

In that case, I hope he remains the California RAT Party spokesman for a long, long time. He's a walking, talking guarantee that the recall will pass and some Republican will win (be it Ah-nold, McClintock or anyone else).

158 posted on 08/10/2003 8:05:01 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie
The only Dems that seem like straight shooters to me are Nelson from OK (I think), who usually votes with Zell Miller (and I adore him). That is, FOR the President's judicial nominees, and against the filibuster. The other one seems to be Evan Bayh, who seems to be shaking his head in perplexity at the shenanigans of his own party. Some of you might have personal experience with either of them that differs though.
159 posted on 08/10/2003 8:05:19 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (I like everyone else's tag better than mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
He fights dirty. He's the King of Scum. The man is totally without morals.
160 posted on 08/10/2003 8:06:43 PM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
f you actually believe that Califoria can go from LIBERAL to CoNSERVATIVE without electing a Liberal Republican, you are Calif. dreaming!!! Wish it were sao....it AIN'T.

The spread was only 5% last time with a very conservative Republican candidate, and the winner of this October's election will likely have a much smaller share of the vote than last time. For such a sunny, plentiful state, California sure has a lot of desperate pessimists.

161 posted on 08/10/2003 8:07:55 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: RightOnGOP
Here he is groping British interviewer Denise van Outen just recently --

Does this guy look "monogamous" to you?

162 posted on 08/10/2003 8:08:02 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
There is some indication that Schwarzengroper would as big an embarassment in Sacramento as Bill Clinton was in DC.

Anna Richardson is a professional TV ----tease; considering her reputation, nobody would blame Arnold even if it WAS proven true. The RATS will have to come up with someone several orders of magnitude more angelic before the public would even pay attention ... and they probably won't even then. The first thing Arnold did was warn them that Davis was going to go after him on this issue, and after what Mulholland did today, almost anything "negative" leaked out about Arnold that doesn't rise to the level of a felony will now be considered by the public as a RAT dirty trick and only GAIN Arnold votes.

163 posted on 08/10/2003 8:11:35 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; backhoe
Here's the dope on Mulholland, thanks to the freat work of backhoe!


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/723210/posts?q=1&&page=86#86
164 posted on 08/10/2003 8:14:17 PM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
yes, that was him...

>>>Anyone know if Mulholland is the same lunatic RAT party spokesman that was on Rita Cosby's Fox show last night discussing Arnold?
165 posted on 08/10/2003 8:15:34 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus
The spread was only 5% last time with a very conservative Republican candidate...

...against a man so hated he's facing a recall election only nine months later. The only reason Simon even came close is because the voters' disgust with Davis was already overwhelming even then.

166 posted on 08/10/2003 8:16:55 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
The Demorats are trying to get the Clinton voters to vote for Arnold? Hmmm... ;)

No

They are trying to get Republican voters to vote for Simon or McClintock to split the votes so Bustamante gets the plurality. It is the only logical strategy that can work. Davis is going to be recalled.

167 posted on 08/10/2003 8:22:12 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx; backhoe
Here's the dope on Mulholland, thanks to the freat work of backhoe!

Amazing. And to think that all those lies, all that hate, is what got him PROMOTED to the highest PR position in the whole of the Democratic Party. In any other organization of any sort in the country, he would have been fired after his first stunt. The RATS have truly devolved into an organization of evil.

Thanks backhoe and onyx!

168 posted on 08/10/2003 8:22:44 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
The twists and turns of this short campaign should be fun to watch.
169 posted on 08/10/2003 8:24:23 PM PDT by TheDon (Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Yes, Mulholland is a scum sucker.

But will you be happy listening to this six months from now?...

"Now you leezen to me. I deed not haf zex viss dat voomahn."

Lie down with Kennedys, get up with fleas. You heard it here first.

170 posted on 08/10/2003 8:25:49 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
mullhollond is about as sleazy as they, the dem'rats get. i remember the first time i saw him. i wanted to take a shower.
171 posted on 08/10/2003 8:26:34 PM PDT by scott91
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Makes you wonder. It got Bill Clinton reelected even though Oklahomans tried to tell the rest of the Country Clinton was scum!
172 posted on 08/10/2003 8:27:41 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
Nelson is from Nebraska! We have two great Republican Senators in Nickles and Inhofe from Oklahoma.

Keep hearing rumblings that Nelson from NE may switch to Republican when he runs again in 2006! He has voted with us more than Miller even!
173 posted on 08/10/2003 8:29:34 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: scott91
The timing here is just about right---get all the dirt out now---noone is paying attention....it's summer...blah blah. I think it is to Arnold's advantage to get beat up now and to get beat up hard. It will toughen him up politically in time for his "performance" this Fall.
174 posted on 08/10/2003 8:30:21 PM PDT by pkmaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Well, whoever that is in that picture appears to be groping, but it sure ain't Arnold! Look at the shoulders (or lack thereof), and the eyebrows, facial shape and mouth are all wrong. This is a spoof picture, IMO.
175 posted on 08/10/2003 8:31:09 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (I like everyone else's tag better than mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Anold has a Master's Degree in Business which is probably waaaaay more experience than Gray-out has.

You honestly think that a paper document attesting to one's appearance in a classroom is an appropriate substitute for running a multi-layered organization with a multi-billion dollar budget serving millions of people?

That's truly California dreamin'.

176 posted on 08/10/2003 8:36:31 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Schwarzenegger said he was "embarrassed" by independent counsel Kenneth Starr's investigation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
No, it saved Clinton from being thrown out of office on his ass by the U.S Senate after he was impeached. Let the Democrats bring up Arnold's sex life. They've got nothing else to say.
177 posted on 08/10/2003 8:39:09 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
Jamie Lee Curtis said in 2002 when Arnold was considering running and the RATs had those two operatives come forward that Arnold was not like he was being portrayed. He was a family man!

Have a feeling other people from the Hollywood community are going to come forward since not all of them are on kneepads for Clinton.

BTW if you get a chance, see Jamie Lee Curtis' new movie Freaky Friday -- it is hilarious and keeps you laughing all through the movie. After I saw she defended Arnold in 2002, I am even more glad my daughter and I went to her movie on Friday!
178 posted on 08/10/2003 8:52:23 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
They are trying to get Republican voters to vote for Simon or McClintock to split the votes so Bustamante gets the plurality. It is the only logical strategy that can work. Davis is going to be recalled

Question :
If the Democrats realized Davis was going to be recalled, why have they only put Davis's underling on the ballot ?

Answer :
The Progressively Fascist Democrats are in complete meltdown in California. They have not a clue as to what they are doing or what is about to happen to them. In the state of California they have won elections and controlled all the major electable offices by smear campaign tactics. Their fiscal political ideals have been rejected by the public but they forced their way into office threw smear tactics. As a result of their fiscal governance and failed ideology the states fiscal budget is wrecked, the states bond rating is wrecked, they have driven thousands of businesses away and driven large population blocks away. They were recently caught conspiring to create a fiscal budget crisis just so they could convince (or extort) the Californian public to amend the 2/3 requirement to raise taxes. They have fought the recall every way possible. Attempted numerous lawsuits to slow the recall and all have failed. At the very edge of the cliff the progressively fascist herd is running over, what do they do ? Install a Davis puppet on the ballot who asks Democrats to vote NO on the recall but YES on him. I guess in some alternative universe that type of logic might be called democratic. And to top this all off, they begin their smear tactic on Arnold by threatening him with 'real bullets'. When Arnold says he will clean Sacramento of the corrupt politicians, how have these same corrupt politicians responded ? With threats of 'real bullets'. This my friends is the very definition of political corruption.

179 posted on 08/10/2003 8:53:31 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: scott91
mullhollond is about as sleazy as they, the dem'rats get. i remember the first time i saw him. i wanted to take a shower.

The best thing that can happen is for the dims to put out spokesmen like Mulholland. There are not enough adjectives to describe the sleaze of this man. Everytime a campaign like this comes up, Mulholland slithers out from under his rock, and his forked tongue is put to work. Chris Matthews cannot stand him, what does that tell you? This is only the first day of the campaign, and this sleazeball is just getting warmed up. Stay tuned!

180 posted on 08/10/2003 8:55:52 PM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Suppose that career politicians are better at running State Government?

Bet you don't like President Bush either! He ran the Texas Rangers and an Oil business but he didn't know anything either according to the RATs when he ran for Governor of Texas -- never did anything -- his Master's and Bachelor's Degrees were just paper because his "Daddy" got him his degrees and all he had to do was sit in class!

Amazing how dumb some of you think the rest of us are! Your comments about Arnold are right out of the RAT playbook against President Bush! You wouldn't be Ma Richards would you?
181 posted on 08/10/2003 8:56:17 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Then I take you don't believe California voters are weary of this sort of thing...

"Now you leezen doo me. I deed not haf zex veet dat voomahn."

182 posted on 08/10/2003 8:56:47 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
"Anold has a Master's Degree in Business..."

With all due respect, can you document that? Reason I ask is that I tried and couldn't. Also, Schwarzenegger's bio at his campaign website mentions only that he has a BA in business. Nothing about post-grad degrees.

183 posted on 08/10/2003 9:02:17 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
post 183
184 posted on 08/10/2003 9:03:40 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Sigh, again, voting record: Nixon, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Reagan, Bush, Bush, Dole, Bush.

Also, the last I've seen of the national economy we are still in a jobless recovery. Not good. Also the President's spending habits are way out of control and not to my taste.

185 posted on 08/10/2003 9:04:50 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Schwarzenegger said he was "embarrassed" by independent counsel Kenneth Starr's investigation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
From the Drudge website:

"Mr. Mulholland and his talk of 'real bullets' with Arnold's name on them is reckless and not acceptable political discourse. He should be fired immediately, if the Democrats have any conscience."

Democrats? Conscience? Gee, looks like he'll be fired!

186 posted on 08/10/2003 9:10:21 PM PDT by lowbridge (You are the audience. I am the author. I outrank you! -Franz Liebkind, The Producers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Your comments about Arnold are right out of the RAT playbook against President Bush!

PKM,on most of these threads it is like taking your life in your hands. All you have to do is mention that it is in our best interest to vote for the most conservative person that has the most chance of being elected. I read another post earlier about what a real RHINO is! I paraphrase: The conservative Republicans that vote for someone who has no chance to win are the real RHINOS.

187 posted on 08/10/2003 9:11:38 PM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Aren't you embarassed to have to use that trashy gossip site as your reference?
188 posted on 08/10/2003 9:14:28 PM PDT by Howlin (If we don't post, will he exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
The conservative Republicans that vote for someone who has no chance to win are the real RHINOS.

I couldn't agree more! I have decided not to stay silent as you can see on these threads.

Some of the comments against Arnold are so close to the ones against President Bush when he was running against Ma Richards that I have to wonder.

I would add to that statement about the RINO's that they are also the ones that threaten to stay home and not vote if a candidate isn't 100% of what they want!

Have been called a RINO and that really irritated me since the person was from the "pure" conservatives -- been a lifelong Republican, always vote, and always vote Republican and that person had the nerve to call me a RINO -- they need a reality check!

189 posted on 08/10/2003 9:21:05 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
Here he is visiting with Lt. Col. Michael Steel, commander, 2nd Battalian, 22nd Infantry, at Camp McGovern. Compare...


190 posted on 08/10/2003 9:24:36 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yes, but I'll recover.
191 posted on 08/10/2003 9:25:11 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Aren't you embarassed to have to use that trashy gossip site as your reference?

Forgive him Howlin, he apparently would like to see Bustamante have a chance to inact his hidden agenda.(and we all know what that is do we not?)

192 posted on 08/10/2003 9:27:42 PM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Here he is visiting with Lt. Col. Michael Steel

Heroic Ranger from Somalia bump.

193 posted on 08/10/2003 9:29:03 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Schwarzenegger said he was "embarrassed" by independent counsel Kenneth Starr's investigation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
I agree with the first part, but I don't know what the hidden agenda is..........tell me!
194 posted on 08/10/2003 9:29:40 PM PDT by Howlin (If we don't post, will he exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Paul_B
If Mulholland's head doesn't roll, I will want to know why.

Bob Mulholland has been a staple of California Democrat politics for at least the 18 years that I've lived here. He is not a recent phenomenon. His head will not be rolling anywhere. He has a "00" license to kill for the Democrats.

-PJ

195 posted on 08/10/2003 9:30:35 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
.... Mulholland said. "I served in Vietnam, Gray Davis served in Vietnam, and we're not going to be replaced by somebody whose dad was in the Nazi army."

Wow. This guy Mulholland has a serious problem.

Now, if Arnold had been a member of the nazi party himself, then I'd say, he'd be in deep trouble. Since Arnold was born after WWII ended, I don't see the relevency involving Father Schwarzenegger dirty connection. This is the same tactic used against Republicans like Strom Thurmond and Trent Lott. All the while, the Democrat's have no problem with Senator Robert Byrd being a former member of the KKK, or with similar issues involving Ernest Hollings and Algore Sr.

196 posted on 08/10/2003 9:32:10 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; woodyinscc; El Conservador
I stole this from El Conservador:

Well, then what good would your vote be if your candidate is not going to be elected.


197 posted on 08/10/2003 9:32:54 PM PDT by Howlin (If we don't post, will he exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Drudge can't dish the dirt on Arnold fast enough.

Yeah, his super ego just can't forgive Arnold for ruining his "world exclusive" alert that The Terminator would NOT be running.

198 posted on 08/10/2003 9:34:00 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Why does the name Bob Mulholland ring a bell with me? Did he have something to do with the recount?

You're thinking of Bob Beckel, the man who tried to flip Electoral College Electors to Gore in 2000. If you recall, Beckel was being blackmailed a year or so ago by a prostitute he hired for oral sex. He must be making a comeback, because he was on Cal Thomas show on FNC a few weekends ago.

-PJ

199 posted on 08/10/2003 9:35:15 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
I must have my scandals mixed up........LOL.

Now, tell me what the name of that DREADFUL little prissy boy who worked for Bob Beckel was. (And, yes, I remember all that stuff with BB!)
200 posted on 08/10/2003 9:37:07 PM PDT by Howlin (If we don't post, will he exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson