Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nettie
It should be the interest of the parents to ensure the education of their children. I could care less what type of education some one else's kids get! Don't be passing to me the "it helps the value of your property" argument. The bottome line is that people choose to have kids (or at least the creation of kids activity) and they should be totally responsible for that choice. I chose to buy a dog and no one gives me any funding for a dog park, dog school, etc. I don't expect society to help with any responsibility resulting from my choice, therefore I don't expect to have property confiscated from me to assist with responsibility resulting from someone elses choice.

Bottom line, it is not reasonable for a publicly funded entity to restrict the use of that entity to a narrowly defined group of users!
35 posted on 08/11/2003 10:24:26 AM PDT by CSM ("Smoke Gnatzies" - New term for the antis, invented and promoted by Flurry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson