Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Recall: Drawing determines alphabetical order for Oct. 7 ballot
AP via San Diego Union Tribune ^ | August 11, 2003 | Jim Wasserman

Posted on 08/11/2003 3:00:43 PM PDT by heleny

Drawing determines alphabetical order for Oct. 7 ballot
By Jim Wasserman
ASSOCIATED PRESS
1:59 p.m., August 11, 2003

The first letter chosen was R, followed by W, Q and O.

The six-minute grab bag of letters seemed more like a lottery drawing than a routine process, which is done every election to help erase the estimated 5 percent advantage a candidate gets from being at the top of the ballot, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley said.

The letters H, B and S, were drawn as eighth, ninth and tenth, [my correction: 9th, 10th, 11th] meaning that some high-profile candidates, commentator Arianna Huffington, Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante and actor Arnold Schwarzenegger will be relatively near each other on most ballots.

But as the Shelley's office continues to certify finalists for the ballot, the precise order won't be known until late Wednesday when Shelley certifies how many of the 195 candidates who submitted papers will make the official ballot.

Shelley said Monday the office has qualified 96 candidates and is reviewing the paperwork submitted by 99 more.

The lottery-style alphabetical system will rotate names on 80 different ballots in each of the state's Assembly districts. Under the system, candidates who start near the top in ballots used in northern California will shift to the bottom in southern California and work their way toward the middle, possibly for ballots in the 24 voter-rich Assembly districts of Los Angeles.

The huge list of candidates includes a variety of prominent candidates and celebrities, as well as dozens of ordinary Californians from a school teacher to a bail bondsman who paid $3,500 and collected 65 signatures to get on the ballot.

County elections officials fear more difficulties processing such a large ballot, including doing more work by hand, but Shelley urged precision over speed when the polls close on Oct. 7.

"I urge them to do it accurately," he said.

A greatly expanded ballot also means higher costs for the special election, now estimated at up to $66 million. Contra Costa County elections officials said the long candidate list could raise ballot costs by $750,000 over the county's earlier estimate of $1.6 million.

Shelley promised Monday he will ask for help.

"To assist the counties, I intend to urge the Legislature to underwrite the added costs of this election," he said, adding that he would ask on the "high end for reimbursement." The California State Association of Counties, noting the state has typically paid for special elections, also intends to seek legislative relief.

Shelley said the state's costs ballooned from $7 million to $11 million because a short time frame will require first class stamps to mail 11 million sample ballots.

"We don't know what the final costs will be," he said.


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: california; recall; recalldavis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
October 7, 2003 Statewide Special Election Results of Randomized Alphabet Drawing

The results of the Secretary of State's random drawing of letters of the alphabet for the October 7, 2003 Statewide Special Election are listed below. The resulting order of letters constitutes the alphabet to be used for determining the order of candidates' names on the upcoming statewide ballot; it applies throughout the name, not just for the first letter so that Randolph would precede Riddle.

Names of candidates for offices voted on statewide rotate by Assembly district, starting with Assembly District 1 where the names appear as first determined by the random alphabet. In Assembly District 2, the candidate who appeared first in Assembly District 1 drops to the bottom and the other candidates move up one position and so on throughout the 80 districts.

This procedure was established by legislation passed in 1975 in response to court rulings declaring that standard alphabetical order or incumbent-first was unconstitutional since there is a 5% positional bias among undecided voters.

  1. R
  2. W
  3. Q
  4. O
  5. J
  6. M
  7. V
  8. A
  9. H
  10. B
  11. S
  12. G
  13. Z
  14. X
  15. N
  16. T
  17. C
  18. I
  19. E
  20. K
  21. U
  22. P
  23. D
  24. Y
  25. F
  26. L

1 posted on 08/11/2003 3:00:44 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: heleny
Lazamataz would be last.

Figures. Glad I didn't enter the race.

2 posted on 08/11/2003 3:03:03 PM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heleny
Arrianna may be a high profile Candidate but she is still a low life gold digger.
3 posted on 08/11/2003 3:03:18 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heleny
Is it just me, or does this make it especially difficult to locate a candidate this way.
4 posted on 08/11/2003 3:03:20 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
But good ole Larry Flynt is right on top of you.
5 posted on 08/11/2003 3:03:59 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heleny
I'm sorry, but is there anyway they could have made the process even more difficult? What is wrong with alphabetizing? The logic path is scary and I am sure pervasive throughout the state government. Do things the hard, painful and convoluted way at every possible opportunity.
6 posted on 08/11/2003 3:04:24 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
The process will only be difficult for those people who have not looked at the Sample Ballot that will be mailed to them several weeks before the election.

What I'm most concerned with, however, is once people have found their candidate on the ballot and pulled the lever for him/her, that they will stop... and not cast their votes for the two important Propositions that also will appear on the ballot:

Ward Connerly's initiative forbidding the state to collect racial information & a Dem-sponsored initiative changing the requirement to pass a budget from 2/3 to 55%.
7 posted on 08/11/2003 3:09:17 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Free Miguel, Priscilla and Bill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Lazamataz would be last.
Figures. Glad I didn't enter the race.

Only in a few assembly districts. The order rotates up one letter for each district, so L would be the next to last in the 2nd district, 3rd to last in the 3rd district, etc. if all the letters are represented. With 80 districts, you'd be near or at the top a couple times, too, although Lo... would appear before you.

If there are no candidates with names beginning with certain letters (as is usual in regular elections), I'm not sure what is normally done. They probably just skip that letter and rotate to the next letter.

8 posted on 08/11/2003 3:10:48 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Is it just me, or does this make it especially difficult to locate a candidate this way.

Yes. It is done this way intentionally, since someone sued that the candidate at the top of the list gets an advantage of up to 5%.

9 posted on 08/11/2003 3:12:22 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: heleny
Woo hoo! Revolting cat! would be furst! Is it to late to join the fun?

Just imagine:

Guvnor Revolting cat!


10 posted on 08/11/2003 3:15:34 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Go ahead, make my day and re-state the obvious! Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
I'm sorry, but is there anyway they could have made the process even more difficult? What is wrong with alphabetizing?

Then people with the last name A... would have an advantage over those with other last names. The alphabet order has been randomized and rotated in past regular elections, too, as far back as I can remember (not very long), except that it's easier to find your candidate in a list of usually fewer than ten names.

11 posted on 08/11/2003 3:16:01 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: heleny
22, 21, 20, 19, spells P-U-K-E.

-PJ

12 posted on 08/11/2003 3:17:40 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Lazamataz would be last.

That'll learn ya to say your name with a lisp!

13 posted on 08/11/2003 3:18:00 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Go ahead, make my day and re-state the obvious! Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
But good ole Larry Flynt is right on top of you.

Just like in the 'seventies. (shudder)

14 posted on 08/11/2003 3:18:47 PM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
"...a routine process, which is done every election to help erase the estimated 5 percent advantage a candidate gets from being at the top of the ballot, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley said."

Something like this happens in every primary, Rabid - to keep ballots as fair as possible! A simple alphabetical order would not be fair!
15 posted on 08/11/2003 3:21:17 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Freedom isn't Free - Support the Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
What is wrong with alphabetizing?
You don't think someone would get his name changed legally to Aaaron Aaabner just to get on the top of the list? I'm sure silliness like that happens in all sorts of elections. The way it is being done isn't great, but I bet it beats out any other way.
16 posted on 08/11/2003 3:21:57 PM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
But Jim Robinson would have been first!
17 posted on 08/11/2003 3:22:21 PM PDT by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heleny
Glad I'm not on the ballot! LOL!!!
18 posted on 08/11/2003 3:22:33 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
22, 21, 20, 19, spells P-U-K-E.

Yeah, and 25, 17, 21, 20 spells F.C.U.K. (which stands for Football Club United Kingdom, I'm told.)

19 posted on 08/11/2003 3:23:14 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Go ahead, make my day and re-state the obvious! Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: heleny
I understand that some idiots would vote by whatever was closest to the top of the list, but most people are going to want to vote for their favorite candidate. So now everyone has to spend time searching for the name.
20 posted on 08/11/2003 3:23:40 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson