Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox Sues Humor Writer for Using 'Signature' Slogan (Al "Irrelevant" Franken)
Yahoo! News ^ | August 12, 2003 | Reuters

Posted on 08/12/2003 8:31:50 AM PDT by El Conservador

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Fox News Network is suing humor writer Al Franken for trademark infringement over the phrase "fair and balanced" on the cover of his upcoming book, saying it has been "a signature slogan" of the network since 1996.

According to court papers made available on Monday, Fox is seeking a temporary or permanent injunction against Franken and publisher Penguin Group to stop them using the phrase in connection with the book to be published next month.

The network, part of the News Corp group, also asked Manhattan Supreme Court for compensatory and punitive damages.

The title of liberal satirist Franken's new book is "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them." At the bottom of the planned cover is the tag line, "A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right."

Fox claims the use of the phrase is intended to confuse the public and boost book sales.

In the lawsuit, Fox said the network was created "as a specific alternative to what its founders perceived as a liberal bias in the American media."

A spokeswoman for Penguin imprint Dutton, Lisa Johnson, called the lawsuit "extraordinary."

"In trying to suppress Al Franken's book the News Corp is undermining First Amendment principles that protect all media by guaranteeing a free, open and vigorous debate of public issues," she said.

"The attempt to keep the public from reading Franken's message is un-American and runs contrary to everything this country stands for."

Franken worked as a comedy writer in the 1970s and has appeared frequently on "Saturday Night Live."

Reuters/VNU


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alfranken; foxnews; lawsuit; trademark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Trying to cash in Fox's popularity
1 posted on 08/12/2003 8:31:51 AM PDT by El Conservador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
How does she extrapolate "Take our slogan out of your title" to 'suppressing the book'?
2 posted on 08/12/2003 8:33:28 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Al Franken is a mouth-breathing moron, but FoxNews does not have the slightest bit of a legal case here.
3 posted on 08/12/2003 8:34:00 AM PDT by dead (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
The cover:


4 posted on 08/12/2003 8:36:41 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
Exactly what I was thinking. Probably the same way that the leftists extrapolate "You are haters of nature" about people who hunt and fish. Or even "You are murdering scum" about people who own guns. Or maybe "You are fundamentalist intolerate whackos" about anyone who dares mention the Bible in public. Argument Ad Adsurdum. It's their only tool.
5 posted on 08/12/2003 8:38:16 AM PDT by BSunday (I'm speaking against them, therefore I must be a jack booted nazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
"Al Franken is a mouth-breathing moron, but FoxNews does not have the slightest bit of a legal case here.

If they can prove that people will associate that slogan with theirs, or that this moron purposely used that slogan as an afront to Fox News, they have a very good case. Trademark Laws are very specific when it comes to word marks.

6 posted on 08/12/2003 8:41:51 AM PDT by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
The phrase "fair and balanced" was around long before FoxNews. Sorry FoxNews, you don't have any more right to those words than any other else does.
7 posted on 08/12/2003 8:44:06 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
I'd say there is a good case for slander here as well. Franken is openly calling explicit persons liars.

And of course he's going to scream about his "Civil Rights" that's why he wrote the book. Now that there's law suits he can claim he's being persecuted for speaking out. Now his only problem his how to draw the line strait to G.W.Bush.

8 posted on 08/12/2003 8:44:09 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
FoxNews does not have the slightest bit of a legal case here.

I have to agree but it's a good way to get the word out there.

9 posted on 08/12/2003 8:44:34 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Actually, I think it's funny that the stupid moron actually has his picture as the biggest one on the cover that screams it is all about liars telling lies. ;)

Btw, being successful enough to get your picture on the cover of Franken's book may be a source of perverse pride to one or two of the folks on the tv monitors behind him.

10 posted on 08/12/2003 8:46:26 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Penguin is the one who publishes Tom Clancy's outstanding books--an odd combination of authors.
11 posted on 08/12/2003 8:47:21 AM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
If he were running a news channel, and was being deliberately deceptive in trying to steal their trademark, they'd have a case.

But they don't.

Howard Stern had an even more blatant conflict when he named his second book "Miss America" but the case was immediately thrown out of court. The ruling was that he was obviously not being deceptive or trying to make people believe that his book was about the beauty pagent.

The words "fair and balanced" belong to nobody.

12 posted on 08/12/2003 8:47:52 AM PDT by dead (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Look at him, he's a dribbling wuss. Even with a pace-maker, Cheney could kick his ass. And I'm so sure it's fair and balanced. At least those folks in the background don't pretend to be something they're not.
13 posted on 08/12/2003 8:50:37 AM PDT by GigaDittos (I can hear the distant whine about wine in France.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
It's seems the "newsroom" in the background would be a dead give-away. I mean wasn't this fool on Saturday Night Live...how related is that to a newsroom? So where is the relation to his past? Was he once a news person? If so, maybe he's got a chance, otherwise I think it's plainly obvious.
14 posted on 08/12/2003 8:53:30 AM PDT by GigaDittos (I can hear the distant whine about wine in France.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Al Franken is entirely motivated by hatred for those with whom he disagrees.

I'm not even sure what the man believes.

15 posted on 08/12/2003 8:54:53 AM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GigaDittos
And Bill O'Reilly's on the lower left monitor! Oh no, it's not about Fox at all.
16 posted on 08/12/2003 8:56:47 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
"Trademark Laws are very specific when it comes to word marks."

Yes, but if he did not appropriate their slogan as his, but rather used their slogan as "satire" then I think he's okay.
Satire is protected.
17 posted on 08/12/2003 8:57:40 AM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Based on the words alone, I would say that FoxNews doesn't have much of a case. But given the fact that the cover shows Franken standing in a TV control room with two of four TV screens showing FoxNews personalities, their case is strengthened.
18 posted on 08/12/2003 8:57:42 AM PDT by gridlock (Remember: PC Kills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
Liberals "feel" they don't think...( also, they play loose with concepts like telling the truth)

How does she extrapolate "Take our slogan out of your title" to 'suppressing the book'?

19 posted on 08/12/2003 9:01:19 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
We have Ann Coulter. The left counters with... Al Franken?

ROFLMAO!!!

20 posted on 08/12/2003 9:02:15 AM PDT by CheezyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson