posted on 08/13/2003 5:58:46 AM PDT
Notice the repeated reference to the year 1948, when Israel was established.
Truth is, I don't think the Arabic culture for the most part has advanced past the Nineteenth Century.
posted on 08/13/2003 6:08:19 AM PDT
(Throw the rascals out.)
Another question may be "Why does the West hate the Arabs?"
posted on 08/13/2003 6:37:55 AM PDT
bttt for later
posted on 08/13/2003 6:48:47 AM PDT
(God Bless the 101st, stay safe, stay alert and watch your backs)
excellent article as usual from MEMRI.
posted on 08/13/2003 8:11:34 AM PDT
To: Eaker; habs4ever; Ditter; shaggy eel; dorben; Son of Rooster; Tennessee_Bob; Cyrano; ...
PING! Another excellent find from MEMRI
posted on 08/13/2003 8:12:32 AM PDT
The fact of the matter is that the West collectively doesn't hate the Arabs, or more accurately, the peoples who have come to use the Arabic language, at all. Mostly we don't think about them very much. Were it not for the oil issue we would hardly think about them any more than we think about the inhabitants of Nepal, Kenya, or Papua New Guinea - it isn't out of disrespect, it's simply that they have their ways and we have ours, and where the two do not intersect it's really perfectly all right by both.
The Israel issue always was blown up fantastically out of proportion to its real-world impact. Where it is regarded as an affront to Arabic honor it is a stain that must be washed in blood. Where it is regarded as the migration of a certain principally Eastern European population that happens to be Jewish the problem falls away - the exclusion and hostility that has so alienated the two sides is essentially an artificial creation, not that it makes it any less an obstruction now. Nor, to be cold about it, does it directly affect a significant portion of the populations of either the West or the Arabic countries - were all the Palestinians and all the Israelis to drop dead suddenly neither the West nor the Arabic world would do much more than grieve for a human tragedy, but a demographic pinprick.
(Nor is it a necessary religious confrontation - Islam is more comfortable both historically and theologically with Judaism than Christianity is, even, in a number of ways.)
While it is perfectly true that the center of the Arabic world is dependent on an extraction economy that its controlling elite has failed to expand and diversify (for its own reasons to which the author above alludes) that isn't really an excuse. The "Arab" world is much more than Saudi Arabia and a few principalities on the Arabian littoral; it consists of billions of people and a huge potential in terms of human and natural resources that has nothing to do with oil. Something is clearly holding these back, and it isn't the West. It is the toxic political brew composed of elements of militarism and religious fundamentalism that has intoxicated a ruling elite that is profoundly threatened by the necessity to release control in order to foster progress. This elite is using anti-Westernism, and specifically anti-Americanism, as the same sort of security blanket the Soviet Union and its controlling elite did. It is similarly brittle, and in time will fall to the human aspiration for freedom that only ignorance can suppress. There may be an ocean of blood between now and then. It is, essentially, a new Cold War.
It's have vs Have-not. The religion only matters to the extent that it helps explain why Muslim countries have not.
posted on 08/13/2003 10:49:35 AM PDT
by .cnI redruM
("Magna cum laude, summa cum laude, the radio's too laude." - Johnny Dangerously)
Ping to an interesting read.
posted on 08/13/2003 10:56:20 AM PDT
(This is OUR country; let's take it back!!!!!)
To: *Clash of Civilizatio
posted on 08/13/2003 7:08:56 PM PDT
(We all want to touch a rainbow, but singers and songs will never change it alone. We are calling you)
posted on 09/20/2003 7:28:57 PM PDT
posted on 09/21/2003 12:24:13 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson